{"id":75339,"date":"2014-06-08T10:26:17","date_gmt":"2014-06-08T10:26:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2014\/06\/08\/laxe-pekin-moscou-en-mode-turbo\/"},"modified":"2014-06-08T10:26:17","modified_gmt":"2014-06-08T10:26:17","slug":"laxe-pekin-moscou-en-mode-turbo","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2014\/06\/08\/laxe-pekin-moscou-en-mode-turbo\/","title":{"rendered":"L’axe P\u00e9kin-Moscou en mode turbo<\/em>"},"content":{"rendered":"

L’axe P\u00e9kin-Moscou en mode turbo<\/em><\/h4>\n

Le distingu\u00e9 commentateur M.K. Bhadrahkumar rel\u00e8ve, dans une de ses courtes chroniques, sur son site Indian PunchLine<\/em>, le 7 juin 2014<\/a>, le rythme assourdissant que les relations Russie-Chine ont pris depuis la visite de Poutine \u00e0 P\u00e9kin et l’\u00e9tablissement d’une alliance strat\u00e9gique de facto<\/em> entre les deux puissances. Il s’agit d’un constat extr\u00eamement significatif : les actes ou l’absence d’actes qui suivent les grandes d\u00e9clarations de rapprochement et d’alliances nous permettent de juger de l’exacte substance, tr\u00e8s r\u00e9elle et en plein d\u00e9veloppement, ou compl\u00e8tement absente, de ces d\u00e9clarations. Le verdict pour ce cas est suffisamment clair…<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tL’homme-clef du c\u00f4t\u00e9 de Moscou, c’est Nikola\u00ef Patrouchev, ancien chef du FSB devenu pr\u00e9sident du Conseil National de S\u00e9curit\u00e9 russe et conseiller de Poutine pour les questions de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 nationale. Patrouchev se manifeste beaucoup, par des visites \u00e0 P\u00e9kin, second\u00e9 par Dimitri Rogozine, vice-Premier et ministre de l’armement, qui a annonc\u00e9 une coop\u00e9ration avec la Chine pour un transport militaire \u00e0 long rayon d’action et un h\u00e9licopt\u00e8re. Bhadrakumar estime r\u00e9v\u00e9latrices les derni\u00e8res d\u00e9clarations de Patrouchev, \u00e0 partir de P\u00e9kin o\u00f9 il se trouvait le 6 juin. On voit que les organisations OCS (Organisation de Coop\u00e9ration de Shanghai) et BRICS (ou BRICSA<\/a>…) sont impliqu\u00e9es dans l’effort russo-chinois.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abThree statements made by Patrushev from Beijing need to be noted. He said on Friday, For us, it is especially important that our countries’ positions on all issues of the international agenda coincide or are as close as they can be. There have been previous remarks by top Russian officials that the two countries coordinate on many foreign policy issues and\/or that the Russia-China relationship is at its highest level historically. Patrushev’s remark goes beyond that.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbSecondly, reports from Beijing attributed to Patrushev a second statement underscoring a renewed importance that Moscow attaches to the BRICS. It appears that an application by Argentina for inclusion in the BRICS will come up at the grouping’s summit next month in Brazil. Given the backdrop of the tensions in Russia and China’s relations with the US, the inclusion of a second country from Washington’s Latin American backyard’ in the BRICS would draw American ire. Patrushev discussed the issue with his Chinese counterpart. (Interestingly, India backs the Argentine membership claim.)<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThirdly, Patrushev has been quoted as stressing that multiple challenges compel Russia and China at this point in time to boost the potential of regional organizations. He named two organizations Shanghai Cooperation Organization [SCO] and Collective Security Treaty Organization [CSTO]. While the reference to the SCO is almost routine insofar as it brings together Russia and China, it is notable that Patrushev harped on the imperatives of cooperation within the organization’s framework in post-2014 Afghanistan…<\/em>\u00bb <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t… Ainsi se confirme-t-il que l’extraordinaire maladresse, ou plut\u00f4t, la pente irr\u00e9sistible de surpuissance-autodestruction de la politique-Syst\u00e8me, du bloc BAO dans la crise ukrainienne, et bien entendu des USA, particuli\u00e8rement et pr\u00e9cis\u00e9ment sous l’inspiration de la clique neocon<\/em>-R2P, semble avoir r\u00e9ussi ce que les experts occidentaux et particuli\u00e8rement anglo-saxons, du haut de leur omniscience, jugeaient impossible. (\u00abThe Western analysts have been complacent that given the backlog of history and a resultant lack of mutual trust between Russia and China, and taking into account the pro-western’ outlook of the Russian elites, it is highly unlikely that the two countries could ever become strategic partners in the real sense. This thesis seems to be falling by the wayside as the two countries join hands to push back the US.<\/em>\u00bb)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 8 juin 2014 \u00e0 10H25<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

L’axe P\u00e9kin-Moscou en mode turbo Le distingu\u00e9 commentateur M.K. Bhadrahkumar rel\u00e8ve, dans une de ses courtes chroniques, sur son site Indian PunchLine, le 7 juin 2014, le rythme assourdissant que les relations Russie-Chine ont pris depuis la visite de Poutine \u00e0 P\u00e9kin et l’\u00e9tablissement d’une alliance strat\u00e9gique de facto entre les deux puissances. Il s’agit… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[2996,3261,5474,11035,3977,8405,15859,2614,2730],"class_list":["post-75339","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-breves-de-crise","tag-alliance","tag-argentine","tag-bhadrakumar","tag-brics","tag-chine","tag-ocs","tag-patrouchev","tag-rogozine","tag-russie"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75339","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=75339"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75339\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=75339"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=75339"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=75339"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}