\tLe conseiller sp\u00e9cial pour l’\u00e9conomie de Vladimir Poutine, Sergei Glaziev, a publi\u00e9 un article dans la revue Argumenti Nedeli<\/em>, o\u00f9 il d\u00e9taille un plan contre le dollar, sous la forme d’une coalition anti-dollar comme premier pas d’une coalition anti-guerre pour stopper la politique d’agression des USA, du type politique-Syst\u00e8me<\/a>. \u00abAn anti-dollar coalition would be the first step for the creation of an anti-war coalition that can help stop the US’ aggression<\/em>\u00bb, \u00e9crit Valentin Mandrasescu, qui donne le 18 juin 2014<\/a> un rapport de l’article de Glaziev.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tD’une fa\u00e7on g\u00e9n\u00e9rale, Glaziev est consid\u00e9r\u00e9 comme un conseiller influent de Poutine (depuis 2010), mais repr\u00e9sentant bien entendu la tendance radicale, la plus antiSyst\u00e8me, de la direction russe. C’est lui qui a con\u00e7u et mis en place le sch\u00e9ma de l’union eurasiatique qui est la grande id\u00e9e de Poutine pour structurer une entit\u00e9 qui \u00e9quilibre, sinon concurrence les grands ensembles du bloc BAO. Le projet de Glaziev n’a bien entendu gu\u00e8re de rapport direct et organique avec l’union eurasiatique, c’est plut\u00f4t une proposition de circonstance qui s’inscrit dans un dessein antagoniste, (ou un dessein d\u00e9fensif antagoniste), comme riposte \u00e0 ce qu’il juge \u00eatre une offensive antirusse des USA voulue comme d\u00e9cisive, par le biais de la crise ukrainienne. Glaziev pense que son projet rencontrera les vux du corporate power<\/em> europ\u00e9en (de l’UE), qui se trouve menac\u00e9 de pertes colossales (il les chiffre autour de $1 000 milliards) si les sanctions dites de troisi\u00e8me phase, propos\u00e9es par les USA, \u00e9taient mises en action. (Ce que Glaziezv d\u00e9crit comme le plan antirusse des USA passe n\u00e9cessairement par cette troisi\u00e8me phase des sanctions.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00abIn his article,<\/em> [Glazief…] argues that Washington is trying to provoke a Russian military intervention in Ukraine, using the junta in Kiev as bait. If fulfilled, the plan will give Washington a number of important benefits. Firstly, it will allow the US to introduce new sanctions against Russia, writing off Moscow’s portfolio of US Treasury bills. More important is that a new wave of sanctions will create a situation in which Russian companies won’t be able to service their debts to European banks…<\/em> […]<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbCo-opting European countries in a new arms race and military operations against Russia will increase American political influence in Europe and will help the US force the European Union to accept the American version of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, a trade agreement that will basically transform the EU into a big economic colony of the US. Glazyev believes that igniting a new war in Europe will only bring benefits for America and only problems for the European Union. Washington has repeatedly used global and regional wars for the benefit of the American economy and now the White House is trying to use the civil war in Ukraine as a pretext to repeat the old trick.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbGlazyev’s set of countermeasures specifically targets the core strength of the US war machine, i.e. the Fed’s printing press. Putin’s advisor proposes the creation of a \u00ab\u00a0broad anti-dollar alliance\u00a0\u00bb of countries willing and able to drop the dollar from their international trade. Members of the alliance would also refrain from keeping the currency reserves in dollar-denominated instruments. Glazyev advocates treating positions in dollar-denominated instruments like holdings of junk securities and believes that regulators should require full collateralization of such holdings. An anti-dollar coalition would be the first step for the creation of an anti-war coalition that can help stop the US’ aggression.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbUnsurprisingly, Sergey Glazyev believes that the main role in the creation of such a political coalition is to be played by the European business community because America’s attempts to ignite a war in Europe and a cold war against Russia are threatening the interests of big European business. Judging by the recent efforts to stop the sanctions against Russia, made by the German, French, Italian and Austrian business leaders, Putin’s aide is right in his assessment. Somewhat surprisingly for Washington, the war for Ukraine may soon become the war for Europe’s independence from the US and a war against the dollar.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tTyler Durden, de ZeroHedge.com<\/em>, reprend (le 18 juin 2014<\/a>) la pr\u00e9sentation de The Voice of Russia<\/em>, en l’assortissant d’un commentaire o\u00f9 il met en \u00e9vidence combien les m\u00e9dias occidentaux (la presse-Syst\u00e8me du bloc BAO) ont compl\u00e8tement abandonn\u00e9 la couverture de la crise ukrainienne, au profit de la crise irakienne, alors que, pourtant, les troubles continuent en Ukraine. Pour lui, cette occurrence qu’il ne s’explique pas (on peut disserter et conjecturer l\u00e0-dessus, voir le 18 juin 2014<\/a>) arrange parfaitement la direction russe. Durden semble prendre l’article de Glaziev et la pr\u00e9sentation de Mandrasescu \u00e0 la lettre, comme l’annonce d’un prochain d\u00e9veloppement fondamental dans la politique du Kremlin, effectivement contre le dollar, avec divers pays et organisations, et \u00e9ventuellement un regroupement des Europ\u00e9ens, dans tous les cas leur corporate power<\/em>, dans le m\u00eame sens. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00abIt has been a while since both Ukraine, and the ongoing Russian response to western sanctions (which set off the great Eurasian axis in motion, pushing China and Russia close together, and accelerating the Holy Grail gas deal between the two countries) have made headlines. It is still not clear just why the western media dropped Ukraine coverage like a hot potato, especially since the civil war in Ukraine’s Donbas continues to rage and claim dozens of casualties on both sides. Perhaps the audience has simply gotten tired of hearing about mixed chess\/checkers game between Putin vs Obama, and instead has reverted to reading the propaganda surrounding just as deadly events in the third war of Iraq in as many decades.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbHowever, out of sight may be just what Russia’s political elite wants. In fact, as VoR’s Valentin M\u00e2ndrescu reports, while the great US spin and distraction machine is focused elsewhere, Russia is already preparing for the next steps. Which brings us to Putin advisor Sergey Glazyev, the same person who in early March was the first to suggest Russia dump US bonds and abandon the dollar in retaliation to US sanctions, a strategy which worked because even as the Kremlin has retained control over Crimea, western sanctions have magically halted (and not only that, but as the Russian central bank just reported, the country’s 2014 current account surplus may be as high as $35 billion, up from $33 billion in 2013, and a far cry from some fabricated $200+ billion in Russian capital outflows which Mario Draghi was warning about recently). Glazyev was also the person instrumental in pushing the Kremlin to approach China and force the nat gas deal with Beijing which took place not necessarily at the most beneficial terms for Russia.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tOn se base, pour ce commentaire, sur le compte-rendu que Mandrasescu fait de l’article de Glaziev, en observant que l’importance de la chose est \u00e9vidente si l’on se r\u00e9f\u00e8re \u00e0 la position de Glaziev, au travail qu’il a d\u00e9j\u00e0 accompli, et \u00e0 la position qu’il semble d\u00e9tenir actuellement de l’un des conseillers privil\u00e9gi\u00e9s de Poutine. Ce qui para\u00eet alors int\u00e9ressant, c’est de voir combien, sous la plume d’un \u00e9conomiste et par le biais d’un article essentiellement sur le dollar, les interf\u00e9rences politiques tiennent une place consid\u00e9rable. Il est difficile de distinguer l’exacte tactique de Glaziev : estime-t-il que sa proposition de coalition anti-dollar peut \u00eatre d\u00e9velopp\u00e9e sans aggravation marquante de la crise ukrainienne, c’est-\u00e0-dire sans intervention russe dans la partie russophone ? Ou bien implique-t-il (sans l’\u00e9crire explicitement, certes) qu’il faut une aggravation de la crise, \u00e9ventuellement mais pas n\u00e9cessairement avec l’intervention russe, pour provoquer le m\u00e9canisme des sanctions du troisi\u00e8me volet, qui pr\u00e9cipiterait ce qu’il juge probable, c’est-\u00e0-dire une rupture du front du bloc BAO, avec les Europ\u00e9ens refusant de suivre les USA et consid\u00e9rant l’alliance anti-dollar comme seul moyen d’\u00e9viter le d\u00e9sastre \u00e9conomique que l’action US entra\u00eenerait pour eux ?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tIl faut noter que des commentateurs russes sont de l’avis de Tyler Durden, sur le fait que le basculement massif, m\u00e9diatique et politique, de l’attention des directions-Syst\u00e8me du bloc BAO, particuli\u00e8rement des USA, de l’Ukraine vers l’Irak, sert fortement les int\u00e9r\u00eats russes. C’est le cas de Fedor Loukianov, dont on sait l’influence \u00e0 Moscou et au Kremlin, qui \u00e9crit, le 15 juin 2014<\/a> dans Al-Monitor.com<\/em> :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00abIt is curious that Iraq, as a test-project for the global promotion of democracy, was a harbinger of the color revolutions in the former Soviet Union, especially in Georgia and Ukraine. Broadly speaking, these were all elements of the same policy, although pursued by different means. At its core lay the theory of democratic peace, according to which the more democracies there are in the world, the fewer wars and threats thereof will ensue, so that democratization should be fostered by any means. Now the order has been reversed. First, the tumultuous events in Ukraine started, the second series of the democratic revolution in 2004, but now with large-scale use of violence and the threat of state collapse. And then Iraq exploded yet again: The seeds sown over a decade ago have finally sprouted. There is no direct connection, but in the general context of an unpredictably insane world, they are links of one single chain.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbThe new Ukrainian authorities have had no luck. The Iraqi catastrophe clearly diverts the US attention from Ukraine, and this plays into the hands of Russia and those Ukrainian forces in the east of the country that are oriented toward it…<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tCes diverses appr\u00e9ciations conduisent \u00e0 sp\u00e9culer sur le changement possible de la politique russe vis-\u00e0-vis de la crise ukrainienne, dans le sens d’\u00e9largir effectivement cette crise vers des domaines plus fondamentaux, effectivement avec cette hypoth\u00e8se de la recherche d’un arrangement anti-dollar cr\u00e9ant un cadre d’opposition anti-guerre, contre la politique-Syst\u00e8me des USA. Les Russes ont-ils des indications pr\u00e9cises \u00e0 cet \u00e9gard, notamment de la part du corporate power<\/em> europ\u00e9en, comme ils auraient pu en entendre lors du sommet \u00e9conomique de Saint-Petersbourg \u00e0 la fin mai<\/a> ? Ces indications devraient \u00eatre exacerb\u00e9es, bien entendu, par la politique de p\u00e9nalit\u00e9s financi\u00e8res qui semble se d\u00e9velopper aux USA avec les attaques contre Paribas et, plus r\u00e9cemment, contre l’Argentine (voir le 17 juin 2014<\/a>), ainsi d’autant plus confort\u00e9e dans sa demande d’int\u00e9grer<\/a> les BRICS. Ces attaques ne sont possibles que dans la mesure o\u00f9 les victimes font partie des structures financi\u00e8res contr\u00f4l\u00e9es par les USA et utilisent le dollar pour leurs transactions, et elles tendent \u00e0 entrer dans la dialectique anti-guerre d\u00e9velopp\u00e9e par Glaziev, pour plaider en faveur de ses propositions.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tLa question est donc pos\u00e9e de savoir si l’article de Glaziev n’intervient pas, peut-\u00eatre sans qu’il l’ait \u00e9t\u00e9 voulu dans ce sens en raison du d\u00e9calage entre sa r\u00e9daction et sa parution, comme une sorte de feuille de route de la direction russe pour d\u00e9clencher une offensive contre la politique g\u00e9n\u00e9rale US \u00e0 partir des conditions nouvelles \u00e9tablies dans la crise ukrainienne. Et, dans ce cas, on accepterait l’id\u00e9e que ces conditions nouvelles sont puissamment sinon d\u00e9cisivement amend\u00e9es par la crise irakienne, per\u00e7ue par la m\u00eame direction russe comme une opportunit\u00e9 du fait de l’affaiblissement et de la distraction qu’elle impose aux positions US dans la crise ukrainienne.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \tMis en ligne le 2019 juin 2014 \u00e0 11H33<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Pour une coalition anti-dollar Le conseiller sp\u00e9cial pour l’\u00e9conomie de Vladimir Poutine, Sergei Glaziev, a publi\u00e9 un article dans la revue Argumenti Nedeli, o\u00f9 il d\u00e9taille un plan contre le dollar, sous la forme d’une coalition anti-dollar comme premier pas d’une coalition anti-guerre pour stopper la politique d’agression des USA, du type politique-Syst\u00e8me. \u00abAn anti-dollar… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3261,11035,3396,15880,857,7746,15881,4102,916,2859,1296],"class_list":["post-75358","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-argentine","tag-brics","tag-dollar","tag-glaziev","tag-irak","tag-loukianov","tag-paribas","tag-politique-systeme","tag-poutine","tag-saint-petersbourg","tag-ukraine"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75358","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=75358"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75358\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=75358"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=75358"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=75358"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}