On a d\u00e9j\u00e0 vu que la crise du r\u00e9f\u00e9rendum sur la l’ind\u00e9pendance en \u00c9cosse avait suscit\u00e9 diverses r\u00e9actions dans nombre de r\u00e9gions o\u00f9 se pose l’une ou l’autre question du type-s\u00e9cession. (La Catalogne est le prochain point de crise, avec des d\u00e9veloppements en cours, voir ZeroHedge.com<\/em> le 29 septembre 2014<\/a> et RT le 29 septembre 2014<\/a>.) On a ainsi pu voir (le 22 septembre 2014<\/a>) la surprenante enqu\u00eate statistique montrant qu’un citoyen US sur quatre \u00e9tait favorable \u00e0 la s\u00e9cession du gouvernement f\u00e9d\u00e9ral de l’\u00c9tat o\u00f9 il r\u00e9side. Ron Paul, l’un des hommes politiques les plus remarquables et les plus marquants de ces derni\u00e8res ann\u00e9es aux USA, a donn\u00e9 son appr\u00e9ciation de la question de la s\u00e9cession pour les USA, le 28 septembre 2014<\/a>, sur le site de son propre institut, le Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity<\/em>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tApr\u00e8s une rapide analyse du r\u00e9f\u00e9rendum \u00e9cossais, qui met en \u00e9vidence combien cet \u00e9v\u00e9nement a suscit\u00e9 une dynamique nouvelle pour la solution de la s\u00e9cession, Ron Paul s’attache \u00e0 la situation US. Il s’affirme comme un ardent partisan de la s\u00e9cession d’une fa\u00e7on structurelle, et non plus selon des situations sociales, \u00e9conomiques et politiques d\u00e9termin\u00e9es. Il voit la s\u00e9cession comme une solution non seulement pour des r\u00e9gions ou des communaut\u00e9s locales (celles qui voudraient faire s\u00e9cession), mais aussi pour des ensembles macropolitiques dont l’activit\u00e9 est fondamentalement nocive, de notre point de vue, d\u00e9structurante et dissolvante. Pour lui, notamment, la s\u00e9cession est la seule solution pour r\u00e9soudre le probl\u00e8me du gouvernement central (f\u00e9d\u00e9ral) US en tant que moteur de surpuissance produisant des d\u00e9penses \u00e9normes et des courants bellicistes de d\u00e9stabilisation et de d\u00e9structuration qui constituent le principal facteur de d\u00e9sordre du monde.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00ab…Support for secession is also growing in America. According to a recent poll, one in four Americans would support their state seceding from the federal government. Movements and organizations advocating that state governments secede from the federal government, that local governments secede from state governments, or that local governments secede from both the federal and state governments, are springing up around the country. This year, over one million Californians signed a ballot access petition in support of splitting California into six states. While the proposal did not meet the requirements necessary to appear on the ballot, the effort to split California continues to gain support.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbAmericans who embrace secession are acting in a grand American tradition. The Declaration of Independence was written to justify secession from Britain. Supporters of liberty should cheer the growth in support for secession, as it is the ultimate rejection of centralized government and the ideologies of Keynesianism, welfarism, and militarism.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbWidespread acceptance of the principle of peaceful secession and self-determination could resolve many ongoing conflicts. For instance, allowing the people of eastern Ukraine and western Ukraine to decide for themselves whether to spilt into two separate nations may be the only way to resolve their differences. The possibility that people will break away from an oppressive government is one of the most effective checks on the growth of government. It is no coincidence that the transformation of America from a limited republic to a monolithic welfare-warfare state coincided with the discrediting of secession as an appropriate response to excessive government.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbDevolving government into smaller units promotes economic growth. The smaller the size of government, the less power it has to hobble free enterprise with taxes and regulations. Just because people do not wish to live under the same government does not mean they are unwilling or unable to engage in mutually beneficial trade. By eliminating political conflicts, secession could actually make people more interested in trading with each other. Decentralizing government power would thus promote true free trade as opposed to \u00ab\u00a0managed trade controlled by bureaucrats, politicians, and special interests.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbDevolution of power to smaller levels of government should also make it easier for individuals to use a currency of their choice, instead of a currency favored by central bankers and politicians. The growth of support for secession should cheer all supporters of freedom, as devolving power to smaller units of government is one of the best ways to guarantee peace, property, liberty and even cheap whiskey!<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \tMis en ligne le 29 septembre 2014 \u00e0 05H25<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" \u00c9loge de la s\u00e9cession, par Ron Paul On a d\u00e9j\u00e0 vu que la crise du r\u00e9f\u00e9rendum sur la l’ind\u00e9pendance en \u00c9cosse avait suscit\u00e9 diverses r\u00e9actions dans nombre de r\u00e9gions o\u00f9 se pose l’une ou l’autre question du type-s\u00e9cession. (La Catalogne est le prochain point de crise, avec des d\u00e9veloppements en cours, voir ZeroHedge.com le 29… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[13475,6105,3140,3310,2949],"class_list":["post-75533","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-breves-de-crise","tag-catalogne","tag-ecosse","tag-paul","tag-ron","tag-secession"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75533","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=75533"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75533\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=75533"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=75533"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=75533"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}