\tIl se confirme que le groupe Greenwald\/Snowden\/The Intercept<\/em> a b\u00e9n\u00e9fici\u00e9 des informations d’un second lanceur d’alerte (apr\u00e8s Snowden), dans de r\u00e9centes nouvelles publi\u00e9es sur le site The Intercept<\/em>. Ce second Snowden se trouve, lui, aux USA. L’appr\u00e9ciation qu’en fait Snowden lui-m\u00eame dans un documentaire tourn\u00e9 par Laura Poitras, qui travaille avec Greenwald, est qu’il s’agit d’une personne incroyablement audacieuse. Le journaliste Michael Isikoff vient d’affirmer (Yahoo.News<\/em> le 27 octobre 2014<\/a>) que le FBI aurait identifi\u00e9 ce lanceur d’alerte, ou croirait l’avoir identifi\u00e9, et l’aurait interpell\u00e9 en attendant de pouvoir l’inculper, ce qui, en soit, pose un probl\u00e8me d’un ordre nouveau comme on verra plus loin.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tCes diverses informations sont rapport\u00e9es par Russia Today<\/em> le 28 octobre 2014<\/a>, dans un article qui reprend l’ensemble ainsi form\u00e9 par ce qui continue \u00e0 \u00eatre la crise Snowden\/NSA. Cela suscite pour nous deux sortes de remarques, illustr\u00e9es par des extraits du texte de RT.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t La premi\u00e8re est bien la confirmation, justement, que la crise Snowden\/Greenwald, pass\u00e9e compl\u00e8tement au second plan \u00e0 cause de diverses nouvelles crises, dont celle de l’Ukraine, bien entendu, n’en reste pas moins tr\u00e8s active. Ainsi se trouvent infirm\u00e9s les pronostics potentiels qui craignaient de voir les facteurs constitutifs de cette crise dispara\u00eetre en m\u00eame temps que la crise elle-m\u00eame dispara\u00eetrait une fois son paroxysme apais\u00e9. Au contraire, on voit confirm\u00e9 ce fait, \u00e0 l’image de la dynamique \u00e9v\u00e9nementielle en cours, que cette crise s’est structur\u00e9e pour le long terme et les \u00e9v\u00e9nements courants en devenant crise structurelle, sinon crise institutionnalis\u00e9e… Ces qualificatifs (structurelle, institutionnalis\u00e9e) sont bien entendu compl\u00e8tement inattendus pour une crise qui est par d\u00e9finition un \u00e9v\u00e9nement conjoncturel et destin\u00e9 \u00e0 cesser aussi brutalement qu’il est apparu. Ils ne sont pourtant pas d\u00e9plac\u00e9s et t\u00e9moignent simplement de l’extraordinaire singularit\u00e9 d’un temps historique dont la structure est devenue enti\u00e8rement crisique (signe de sa dimension m\u00e9tahistorique), et qui par cons\u00e9quent structure et institutionnalise les crises qu’il suscite… (Voir aussi le ph\u00e9nom\u00e8ne d’infrastructure<\/a> crisique<\/a>.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tUn \u00e9l\u00e9ment compl\u00e9mentaire \u00e0 observer est ceci que l’apparition d’un second Snowden donne \u00e0 la crise Snowden\/NSA une tournure diff\u00e9rente de celle que divers commentateurs craignaient. Non seulement, on craignait l’\u00e9touffement de cette crise et la disparition de ses effets, mais on craignait en plus que ses p\u00e9rip\u00e9ties d\u00e9courageassent les lanceurs d’alerte potentiels du fait du traitement et de l’opprobre officielle subis par Snowden. Ainsi, non seulement l’\u00e9touffement de la crise n’a pas eu lieu mais cette crise, loin de d\u00e9courager les lanceurs d’alerte potentiels par le traitement r\u00e9serv\u00e9 \u00e0 Snowden par les autorit\u00e9s-Syst\u00e8me, les encourage au contraire \u00e0 s’affirmer.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tVoici le r\u00e9cit des p\u00e9rip\u00e9ties r\u00e9centes du second Snowden : \u00abFederal authorities in the United States have reportedly set their sights on a government contractor suspected of being the source responsible for leaking documents in the aftermath of the unauthorized disclosures attributed to Edward Snowden. Investigators recently raided the home of the individual, according to a report published on Monday this week by journalist Michael Isikoff, in accordance with a search warrant filed by federal authorities in the midst of an effort to identify the source of classified documents recently published by The Intercept the online publication founded by Glenn Greenwald, the lawyer-turned-columnist who has worked for the last year-and-a-half on a trove of documents pilfered from the National Security Agency by Snowden, a former contractor for the American spy agency.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbWhile Snowden, 31, identified himself as the source of the NSA leaks in June 2013 before federal prosecutors could out him, two reports published in recent months by The Intercept concerning the US government’s use of no-fly watchlists suggested that a second, publicly unknown source within the intelligence community has colluded with Greenwald and company. In Citizen Four, a documentary about the Snowden saga currently being screened at select theaters in the US, Greenwald and fellow Intercept journalist Jeremy Scahill acknowledge that a new source has provided the reporters with information in the wake of the NSA leaks. The person is incredibly bold, Snowden says of the unnamed leaker in the Laura Poitras-directed film. It was motivated by what you did, Greenwald responds on camera.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t Le deuxi\u00e8me point vient \u00e9galement a contrario<\/em> de ce que l’on pensait g\u00e9n\u00e9ralement de l’\u00e9volution de la politique int\u00e9rieure US au regard de cet \u00e9v\u00e9nement. On craignait que la crise Snowden\/NSA conduirait \u00e0 un renforcement de l’\u00e9treinte polici\u00e8re des diverses directions-Syst\u00e8me aux USA, contre les dissidents et autres lanceurs d’alerte. C’est le contraire qui appara\u00eet dans ces remarques cit\u00e9es ci-dessous, o\u00f9 l’on voit que les milieux de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 nationale (le renseignement dans ses divers services et agences) sont pr\u00e9occup\u00e9s de ce qu’ils per\u00e7oivent des h\u00e9sitations, voire d’une r\u00e9ticence nouvelle du d\u00e9partement de la justice de lancer des inculpations exceptionnelles contre les susdits-dissidents et lanceurs d’alerte.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tLa direction de l’administration Obama semble effectivement sensible aux remous de communication d\u00e9clench\u00e9s par les mesures r\u00e9pressives qui ont \u00e9t\u00e9 prises et largement rendues publiques en marge de la crise Snowden\/NSA, question de r\u00e9putation, et de belle image de communication. Cette attitude int\u00e9ressante montre que m\u00eame l’\u00c9tat-policier aux USA est comme le reste sensible \u00e0 l’apparence de vertu dont il pr\u00e9tend se parer… Cette sorte de vanit\u00e9 du moralisme et ce besoin irresponsable de l’apparence vertueuse propres aux syst\u00e8mes de pouvoir d\u00e9pendant enti\u00e8rement de la communication est le meilleur frein qu’on puisse esp\u00e9rer et, selon nous, la garantie que l’\u00e8re de la communication o\u00f9 nous sommes interdit au pouvoir en place de s’affirmer dans tout l’autoritarisme qu’il voudrait d\u00e9ployer. Leur impuissance et leur paralysie, \u00e0 ces diff\u00e9rents pouvoirs-Syst\u00e8me, se manifestent de tous les c\u00f4t\u00e9s.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00abThe Intercept has previously refrained from naming their source, and Isikoff neglected to disclose the identity of the individual in this week’s report. Nonetheless, he alleges in Monday’s article that federal investigators have narrowed in on the person, purportedly a government contractor, and are weighing what sort of legal action, if any, they’ll take next. Should authorities take the same route with this suspect as they did with Snowden, then the source could expect to be prosecuted under the Espionage Act a World War One-era legislation originally intended to charge foreign spies but since used no fewer than seven times by the current administration to indict government officials accused of providing classified information to the media.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbAccording to Isikoff, however, unnamed Justice Department officials implied that the administration may refrain from opening up another espionage case: But the case has also generated concerns among some within the US intelligence community that top Justice Department officials stung by criticism that they have been overzealous in pursuing leak cases may now be more reluctant to bring criminal charges involving unauthorized disclosures to the news media, the sources said. One source, who asked not to be identified because of the sensitivity of the matter, said there was concern there is no longer an appetite at Justice for these cases,’ Isikoff wrote. \u00ab\u00a0Investigators are continuing to pursue it, but are not ready to charge yet, he quoted another anonymous source as saying.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \tMis en ligne le 28 octobre 2014 \u00e0 17H09<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Des nouvelles d’un second Snowden Il se confirme que le groupe Greenwald\/Snowden\/The Intercept a b\u00e9n\u00e9fici\u00e9 des informations d’un second lanceur d’alerte (apr\u00e8s Snowden), dans de r\u00e9centes nouvelles publi\u00e9es sur le site The Intercept. Ce second Snowden se trouve, lui, aux USA. L’appr\u00e9ciation qu’en fait Snowden lui-m\u00eame dans un documentaire tourn\u00e9 par Laura Poitras, qui travaille… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[8294,12598,6944,7572,15609,12597,12366,8046,12224,3050],"class_list":["post-75580","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-crisique","tag-dalerte","tag-greenwald","tag-infrastructure","tag-intercept","tag-lanceur","tag-poitras","tag-repression","tag-snowden","tag-the"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75580","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=75580"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75580\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=75580"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=75580"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=75580"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}