{"id":75633,"date":"2014-12-01T05:27:24","date_gmt":"2014-12-01T05:27:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2014\/12\/01\/des-s-400-russes-pour-la-chine\/"},"modified":"2014-12-01T05:27:24","modified_gmt":"2014-12-01T05:27:24","slug":"des-s-400-russes-pour-la-chine","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2014\/12\/01\/des-s-400-russes-pour-la-chine\/","title":{"rendered":"Des S-400 russes pour la Chine"},"content":{"rendered":"

Des S-400 russes pour la Chine<\/h3>\n<\/p>\n

\tLa signature d’un tr\u00e8s important contrat d’armement entre la Russie et la Chine vient d’\u00eatre annonc\u00e9. D’un montant de $3 milliards, il porte sur au moins six bataillons de missiles sol-air S-400 Triumf<\/em>, ce qui est le premier cas d’exportation de ce syst\u00e8me. Le S-400 est le successeur du S-300, dont il est d\u00e9riv\u00e9, avec des capacit\u00e9s de port\u00e9e, de pr\u00e9cision et d’efficacit\u00e9 g\u00e9n\u00e9rale largement am\u00e9lior\u00e9es. Le S-400, encore plus que le S-300, est d\u00e9finitivement un missiles antimissiles (en plus d’\u00eatre anti-avions, bien s\u00fbr), et il peut ainsi \u00eatre consid\u00e9r\u00e9 comme une arme strat\u00e9gique de premi\u00e8re importance. Dans tous les cas, au niveau de la communication (notamment gr\u00e2ce \u00e0 la notori\u00e9t\u00e9 acquise par son pr\u00e9d\u00e9cesseur S-300<\/a>), c’est bien ainsi qu’il est per\u00e7u.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tC’est Russia Beyond the Headlines<\/em> qui annonce la nouvelle le 26 novembre 2014 : \u00abA contract between Rosoboronexport and the Chinese Defense Ministry was signed at the beginning of this fall for the delivery of at least six battalions of S-400 air defense missile systems worth of more than $3 billion, Vedomosti reported on Wednesday. Negotiations on the delivery of S-400 systems to China had been in progress for several years and the Russian Defense Ministry said in 2011 that exports might begin no earlier than 2016 because the Russian Armed Forces would have to be provided for first, the newspaper said.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbSaudi Arabia’s interest in the long-range air defense system was reported again and again but those negotiations came to a halt. The Belarusian Defense Ministry declared its wish to buy the system, and system marketing was done in Libya. The S-400 system was part of the Turkish Armed Forces’ tender for air defense systems but it was defeated by the Chinese HQ-2, a derivative of Russia’s S-300PMU-2. Turkey cancelled the results of that tender in fall 2013 under the pressure from its North Atlantic Alliance partners, the report said. The S-400 Triumf air defense missile system is a product of the Almaz-Antei Concern and is based on the S-300 long-range air defense system, one of whose major buyers was the People’s Liberation Army of China. Rosoboronexport fulfilled the most recent contract for 15 battalions of the S-300PMU-2 air defense missile system in 2010.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tRussia Insider<\/em> (RI) reprend la nouvelle le 28 novembre 2014<\/a> et la qualifie de \u00abStrategic Game Changer<\/em>\u00bb : \u00abTo understand the significance of this story you must know two things. One is that the air defense system in question is the most advanced in Russia’s own military arsenal. The second is that so far Moscow has been reluctant to transfer its most state of the art weapons systems to China. That now it does so points to a new-found proximity between the two.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLe contrat avec la Chine a \u00e9t\u00e9 discut\u00e9 depuis plusieurs ann\u00e9es avec difficult\u00e9, notamment pour ce qui concerne le transfert de technologies impliqu\u00e9 de la Russie vers la Chine. Quoi qu’il en soit de la chronologie du point de vue technique, sa signature intervenant maintenant, dans les circonstances qu’on conna\u00eet, sera per\u00e7ue d’un point de vue politique comme un signe de plus de l’\u00e9volution d\u00e9cisive des rapports strat\u00e9giques et politiques entre la Russe et la Chine, avec la Russie comme fournisseur d’armements avanc\u00e9s \u00e0 la Chine. Il renforce la coop\u00e9ration vers une coordination de facto<\/em> d’une d\u00e9fense a\u00e9rienne s’\u00e9tendant \u00e0 diverses cat\u00e9gories de missiles, notamment les cruise missiles, les missiles balistiques de port\u00e9e interm\u00e9diaires, et toute autre menaces atmosph\u00e9riques. (Selon Air Power Australia<\/em>, les S-400<\/a> Triumf<\/em> \u00ab are intended to destroy opposing stand-off jammer aircraft, AWACS\/AEW&C aircraft, reconnaissance and armed reconnaissance aircraft, cruise missile armed strategic bombers, cruise missiles, Tactical, Theatre and Intermediate Range Ballistic Missiles, and any other atmospheric threats, all in an intensive Electronic Counter Measures environment<\/em>\u00bb.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 1er d\u00e9cembre 2014 \u00e0 05H25<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Des S-400 russes pour la Chine La signature d’un tr\u00e8s important contrat d’armement entre la Russie et la Chine vient d’\u00eatre annonc\u00e9. D’un montant de $3 milliards, il porte sur au moins six bataillons de missiles sol-air S-400 Triumf, ce qui est le premier cas d’exportation de ce syst\u00e8me. Le S-400 est le successeur du… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[4056,16198,3435,2970,8446,8289,5770,16199],"class_list":["post-75633","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-breves-de-crise","tag-antimissiles","tag-chine-russie","tag-cooperation","tag-missiles","tag-s-300","tag-s-400","tag-strategiques","tag-triumf"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75633","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=75633"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75633\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=75633"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=75633"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=75633"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}