{"id":75664,"date":"2014-12-19T11:45:33","date_gmt":"2014-12-19T11:45:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2014\/12\/19\/cuba-et-coup-bas\/"},"modified":"2014-12-19T11:45:33","modified_gmt":"2014-12-19T11:45:33","slug":"cuba-et-coup-bas","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2014\/12\/19\/cuba-et-coup-bas\/","title":{"rendered":"Cuba et coup bas"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><h4 class=\"breve-de-crise\">Cuba et coup bas<\/h4>\n<p>Qu&rsquo;en pense <em>dedefensa<\/em> ? interrogeait une lectrice \u00e0 propos du r\u00e9tablissement prochain des relations entre Cuba et les USA. Pour l&rsquo;instant, <em>dedefensa.org<\/em> ne pense pas vraiment parce que le Syst\u00e8me pense avec un tel fracas,  celui de la presse-Syst\u00e8me et des nombreux antiSyst\u00e8me qui n&rsquo;ont de cesse de voir le Syst\u00e8me triompher et qui voient dans l&rsquo;\u00e9v\u00e9nement un formidable succ\u00e8s pour Obama et les USA,  que, diable, l&rsquo;on ne s&rsquo;entend plus penser&#8230; D&rsquo;o\u00f9 notre conseil  : attendons un peu puisque, pour l&rsquo;instant le syst\u00e8me de la communication est r\u00e9quisitionn\u00e9 &#8230; Il pourrait notamment appara\u00eetre qu&rsquo;il n&rsquo;est nullement assur\u00e9 que cet \u00e9v\u00e9nement, qui est effectivement et essentiellement un \u00e9v\u00e9nement de communication, ait une r\u00e9elle importance sur la dur\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tRestons-en au constat : partout donc, dans la presse-Syst\u00e8me comme chez les pr\u00e9tendus antiSyst\u00e8me dits-r\u00e9alistes, on mesure comme une formidable victoire diplomatique US l&rsquo;acte consistant pour cette puissance consid\u00e9rable \u00e0 abandonner des sanctions unilat\u00e9rales maintenues depuis un demi-si\u00e8cle contre un pays aussi petit que Cuba . Il \u00e9tait in\u00e9vitable que certains ne soient pas de cet avis qu&rsquo;il s&rsquo;agit l\u00e0 d&rsquo;une formidable victoire diplomatique US. Ceux-l\u00e0, qui d\u00e9tonnent par rapport au reste qui dit la m\u00eame chose, sont donc int\u00e9ressants \u00e0 \u00e9couter. Curieusement, on trouve dans cette cohorte de contestataires les anticastristes les plus extr\u00eames qui repr\u00e9sentent une force d&rsquo;influence imposante aux USA (en Floride, particuli\u00e8rement), et les castristes orthodoxes qui continuent \u00e0 l&rsquo;\u00eatre malgr\u00e9 leur s\u00e9jour dans les prisons US.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tDocumentation int\u00e9ressante dans <em>Democracy Now !<\/em>, qui interroge l&rsquo;un des Cubains lib\u00e9r\u00e9s et son \u00e9quipe juridique, le <a href=\"http:\/\/www.democracynow.org\/2014\/12\/18\/does_the_release_of_the_cuban\" class=\"gen\">18 d\u00e9cembre 2014<\/a>. Mais ce que nous retiendrons de ce texte, c&rsquo;est la citation du s\u00e9nateur Marco Rubio, l&rsquo;un des plus acharn\u00e9s anticastristes, dont on attend qu&rsquo;il m\u00e8ne la contre-offensive du Congr\u00e8s, contre la d\u00e9cision d&rsquo;Obama&#8230;<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t<strong><em>Marco Rubio<\/em><\/strong> : \u00ab<em>The White House has conceded everything and gained little. They gained no commitment on the part of the Cuban regime to freedom of press or freedom of speech or elections. No binding commitment was made to truly open up the Internet. No commitment was made to allowing the establishment of political parties or to even begin the semblance of a transition to democracy. And in exchange for all of these concessions, the only thing the Cuban government agreed to do is free 53 political prisoners, who could wind up in jail tomorrow morning if they once again take up the cause of freedom. &#8230;<\/em> [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>These changes will lead to legitimacy for a government that shamelessly, continuously abuses human rights, but it will not lead to assistance for those whose rights are being abused. It is just another concession to a tyranny by the Obama administration, rather than a defense of every universal and inalienable right that our country was founded on and stands for.<\/em>\u00bb <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t<em>Russia Today<\/em> a interrog\u00e9 (le <a href=\"http:\/\/rt.com\/news\/215779-cuba-us-relations-gonzalez\/\" class=\"gen\">19 d\u00e9cembre 2014<\/a>) Ren\u00e9 Gonzales, l&rsquo;un des cinq agents de renseignement cubains arr\u00eat\u00e9s en 1988, et lui-m\u00eame lib\u00e9r\u00e9 en 2011. Gonzales a accueilli les trois derniers agents du groupe qui viennent d&rsquo;\u00eatre lib\u00e9r\u00e9s. Il donne sa version de l&rsquo;\u00e9v\u00e9nement en en r\u00e9sumant la cause de cette fa\u00e7on : En voulant isoler Cuba, les USA s&rsquo;\u00e9taient compl\u00e8tement isol\u00e9s du reste du monde dans cette affaire des sanctions et d&rsquo;un embargo d&rsquo;un demi-si\u00e8cle.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>A step of reconciliation with Cuba was inevitable, as the US was becoming increasingly isolated in its failed attempts to isolate Cuba while their competitors were building closer ties with the island, Cuban intelligence agent Rene Gonzalez told RT. Gonzalez was arrested in 1998 with four other members of the Wasp Network, secretly deployed by Cuba in Miami to monitor the expat community. After spending 13 years behind bars on charges of espionage, he was released in 2011, and has now been reunited with three other members of the group, exchanged this week for US intelligence agent Alan Gross, and another unnamed spy.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>I found the returnees in good spirits and happy, Gonzalez told RT, refusing to be drawn on the particulars of the surprise prisoner exchange, which came alongside news that Washington was to open an embassy in Havana, and normalize relations with Cuba In terms of its attitude towards Cuba the United States gradually found itself in isolation, while their goal was to isolate Cuba, Gonzalez said.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>But not only the world community was changing its attitude towards Cuba and demanding similar policy change from Washington, but business circles within the US itself did not want to miss opportunities to their competitors, Gonzalez believes. They saw their economic competitors increasingly converging with Cuba while they could not do that. In the end, this process has led to a lot of people, those who are in power, coming to a conclusion that the situation in the relations between Cuba and the United States cannot remain the same.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 19 d\u00e9cembre 2014  \u00e0 11H34<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Cuba et coup bas Qu&rsquo;en pense dedefensa ? interrogeait une lectrice \u00e0 propos du r\u00e9tablissement prochain des relations entre Cuba et les USA. Pour l&rsquo;instant, dedefensa.org ne pense pas vraiment parce que le Syst\u00e8me pense avec un tel fracas, celui de la presse-Syst\u00e8me et des nombreux antiSyst\u00e8me qui n&rsquo;ont de cesse de voir le Syst\u00e8me&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[3678,4470,1140,5142,2627,5646],"class_list":["post-75664","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-breves-de-crise","tag-castro","tag-cuba","tag-embargo","tag-gonzales","tag-rubio","tag-sanctions"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75664","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=75664"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75664\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=75664"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=75664"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=75664"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}