{"id":75700,"date":"2015-01-13T16:25:28","date_gmt":"2015-01-13T16:25:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2015\/01\/13\/horreur-bho-was-not-charlie-in-paris\/"},"modified":"2015-01-13T16:25:28","modified_gmt":"2015-01-13T16:25:28","slug":"horreur-bho-was-not-charlie-in-paris","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2015\/01\/13\/horreur-bho-was-not-charlie-in-paris\/","title":{"rendered":"Horreur ! BHO was not<\/em> Charlie in Paris<\/em>"},"content":{"rendered":"

Horreur ! BHO was not<\/em> Charlie in Paris<\/em><\/h4>\n

Cela fait grand bruit et \u00e9norme scandale \u00e0 Washington D.C. Il semble (restons prudent) qu’aucun officiel de haut rang des USA, et bien entendu pas le pr\u00e9sident, n’\u00e9tait pr\u00e9sent \u00e0 Paris au milieu du d\u00e9luge humain saluant les \u00e9v\u00e9nements de la semaine derni\u00e8re \u00e0 Paris et dans la r\u00e9gion parisienne. On dit que l’ambassadeur US \u00e9tait l\u00e0, ou bien Victoria Nuland, mais ceci et cela serait soit d\u00e9menti, soit non confirm\u00e9, au choix. Le secr\u00e9taire \u00e0 la justice Holder \u00e9tait \u00e0 Paris mais ne s’est pas d\u00e9plac\u00e9 dans le sens Je suis Charlie ou bien aurait \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9j\u00e0 sur le d\u00e9part, quoique saluant la France dans cette terrible \u00e9preuve. La presse US, la mainstream<\/em> cette fois, la presse-Syst\u00e8me, fr\u00e9mit absolument d’horreur devant ce manquement inacceptable, intol\u00e9rable, cette \u00e9norme gaffe au sein du bloc BAO. Inutile de d\u00e9tailler tous les articles reprenant et d\u00e9taillant cet \u00e9norme scandale, et choisissons, un peu au hasard, quelques extraits du compte-rendu de Politico.com<\/em> du 11 janvier 2015<\/a>, au moins selon l’argument que l’article commence par une phrase en fran\u00e7ais, sans faute, ce qui est inhabituel…<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abBarack Obama n’est pas Charlie or at least, he wasn’t this weekend.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbDon’t look for the president or vice president among the photos of 44 heads of state who locked arms and marched down Boulevard Voltaire in Paris. Nor did they join a companion march the French Embassy organized in Washington on Sunday afternoon.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbIndeed, Obama’s public reactions to the attacks in Paris last week have been muted. His initial response Wednesday to the killing of 12 people at the Charlie Hebdo newspaper offices was delivered as he sat calmly in an armchair in the Oval Office speaking about the cowardly acts and defending freedom of the press. Two days later, as a gunman took hostages and went on to kill four people in a kosher grocery, Obama took a few seconds away from a community college proposal rollout in Tennessee because he said with events unfolding, I wanted to make sure to comment on them but neither then nor afterward specifically condemned that attack.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbObama wasn’t far from the march in D.C. on Sunday that wended silently along six blocks from the Newseum to the National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial. Instead, he spent the chilly afternoon a few blocks away at the White House, with no public schedule, no outings. Joe Biden was back home in Wilmington, Delaware. Neither they nor any high-level administration official attended either event. France’s top diplomat in the U.S. tried, diplomatically, to make the best of it. Thank you to Victoria Nuland, assistant secretary at the Department of State, who has represented the U.S. Authorities at the demonstration in DC. A friend, Ambassador G\u00e9rard Araud tweeted Sunday evening, as criticism of the administration mounted.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbAnd though it’s symbolism Obama made several statements last week condemning the terror, and the government has been supporting French efforts throughout the symbolism has caught a lot of attention. I wish our US President had gone to Paris to stand with our European allies, tweeted James Stavridis, the retired Navy admiral and current dean of Tufts University’s Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbIt’s stunning, truly stunning, said Aaron David Miller, who among other responsibilities during his time at the State Department under both Republican and Democratic administrations, helped deliberate over which officials to send to which events. It’s a poster child for tone deafness. Miller said he could see only two explanations for not sending the president, vice president or even first lady Michelle Obama to Paris: either that there was a deep terror threat, or that Obama might be secretly planning a larger event with NATO allies bigger than the visit that British Prime Minister David Cameron (who was in Paris Sunday) will be making to the White House at the end of the week. But there’s no sign of such an event being organized, and Miller said there’s no reason to believe one is coming.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbBut Miller said he couldn’t see a reason to skip the rally even if there is a bigger leader event in the planning, and the idea of a security threat didn’t make sense either: After all, the security in the area met the standards of so many other leaders, including Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, combined. It’s unclear what role security concerns might have played in the decision to have no senior American officials take part in the Paris march. As a general rule, the Secret Service doesn’t let either Obama or Biden be in the open air in areas that haven’t had a full security sweep, and the White House tends to be mindful of having security precautions create distractions around events. But a forceful president could dismiss such concerns to make a public point about terrorism. You want to counter that, and you want to show up, Miller said. It’s very much about symbolism. And France and the United States, for a longer period of time, embody the very propositions that are under attack…<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tSuivent diverses autres explications, affirmations, r\u00e9tractation, etc., qui donnent une impression d’extraordinaire d\u00e9sordre dans la non-organisation de la politique de communication-symbolique (nouvelle forme diplomatique si importante, \u00e0 garder \u00e0 l’esprit) de la plus grande et exceptionnelle puissance du monde. On observera que l’ambassadeur de France \u00e0 Washington, G\u00e9rard Araud, sans doute le plus neocon<\/em> des diplomates fran\u00e7ais, s’est fermement tenu aux c\u00f4t\u00e9s de nos alli\u00e9s, en privil\u00e9giant la narrative<\/em> de Noland transform\u00e9e en Je suis Charlie dans les rues de Paris.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t… Le plus remarquable de cet \u00e9pisode, outre la confirmation de l’extr\u00eame impuissance-paralysie du gouvernement-mammouth des USA, \u00e9tant que cet incident est pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 comme d’une extr\u00eame importance pour la forme des relations entre les USA et la France, et les USA et l’Europe en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral, et qu’il l’est peut-\u00eatre… Un sentiment qui se fait jour est que, derri\u00e8re ce d\u00e9sordre gouvernemental US, para\u00eet une fois de plus le d\u00e9sint\u00e9r\u00eat des USA pour l’Europe, ce qui devrait alimenter un courant au cur des processus politiques europ\u00e9ens estimant que les USA entra\u00eenent trop loin, et usent trop de leur influence et de leurs pressions, pour entra\u00eener l’Europe dans la crise ukrainienne dans un sens antirusse … Le plus remarquable de ce qui est d\u00e9j\u00e0 le plus remarquable \u00e9tant qu’\u00e0 notre sens, non, l’explication d\u00e9sordre\/paralysie-impuissance n’est pas plus acceptable finalement que celle du d\u00e9sint\u00e9r\u00eat pour l’Europe, les deux pouvant parfaitement cohabiter \u00e0 partis \u00e9gales et influant l’une sur l’autre, et vice-versa.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t(L’on ajoutera que d’autres explications existent, \u00e0 notre disposition, dont certaines avec un fumet complotiste incontestable. Nous nous laissons \u00e0 nous tous le loisir de les d\u00e9couvrir sans une seule seconde<\/strong> nous prononcer sur leur validit\u00e9 ou non … Nous sommes dans de very uncommon times<\/em> o\u00f9 l’inconnaissance<\/a> n’est pas de trop pour continuer \u00e0 se frayer un chemin…)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 13 janvier 2015 \u00e0 16H07<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Horreur ! BHO was not Charlie in Paris Cela fait grand bruit et \u00e9norme scandale \u00e0 Washington D.C. Il semble (restons prudent) qu’aucun officiel de haut rang des USA, et bien entendu pas le pr\u00e9sident, n’\u00e9tait pr\u00e9sent \u00e0 Paris au milieu du d\u00e9luge humain saluant les \u00e9v\u00e9nements de la semaine derni\u00e8re \u00e0 Paris et dans… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[16325,7275,3015,2628,5311,15108,5616,855,5520,6208,4608,9746],"class_list":["post-75700","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-breves-de-crise","tag-arraud","tag-charlie","tag-communication","tag-diplomatie","tag-funerailles","tag-hebdo","tag-impuissance","tag-kerry","tag-nuland","tag-obama","tag-paralysie","tag-symbolisme"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75700","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=75700"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75700\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=75700"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=75700"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=75700"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}