{"id":75960,"date":"2015-06-20T11:48:00","date_gmt":"2015-06-20T11:48:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2015\/06\/20\/trump-est-il-une-trump-card\/"},"modified":"2015-06-20T11:48:00","modified_gmt":"2015-06-20T11:48:00","slug":"trump-est-il-une-trump-card","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2015\/06\/20\/trump-est-il-une-trump-card\/","title":{"rendered":"Trump est-il une trump card<\/em> ?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Trump est-il une trump card<\/em> ?<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n

Une de nos lectrices nous ayant demand\u00e9 ce que dedefensa.org<\/em> pensait de la candidature pr\u00e9sidentielle du milliardaire Donald Trump, – qui n’en est pas \u00e0 sa premi\u00e8re tentative, – nous r\u00e9pondrons que nous ne savons (pas encore?) quoi penser sinon qu’une telle candidature ne peut en aucun cas \u00eatre pire que toutes les autres r\u00e9unies, et que l’extraordinaire incertitude de l’\u00e9poque peut susciter des surprises. Trump<\/a> est un \u00ab\u00a0super-riche\u00a0\u00bb (capital de $4,1 milliards), ce qui conduit finalement \u00e0 une sorte de vertu puisqu’il s’agit de l’ind\u00e9pendance du candidat \u00e0 l’\u00e9gard de tout donateur, pouvoir d’int\u00e9r\u00eat, etc., et que Trump financera lui-m\u00eame sa campagne. Autre vertu, l’establishment<\/em> ne l’aime pas du tout, comme le signale l’appr\u00e9ciation<\/a> du New York Daily New<\/em> du pro-isra\u00e9lien Mort Zuckerman (la candidature Trump est \u00ab\u00a0une blague\u00a0\u00bb et Trump \u00ab\u00a0un clown\u00a0\u00bb). Les neocons<\/em> le d\u00e9testent parce qu’il a de bonnes relations avec Poutine et que son discours le rapproche d’un Pat Buchanan, populiste, un tantinet isolationniste et pas loin d’\u00eatre protectionniste, soit un anti-globaliste (Trump n’aime pas les trait\u00e9s TPP et TTIP) et un adversaire d\u00e9cid\u00e9 du multiculturalisme et de l’immigration (Trump a des plans grandioses pour boucler la fronti\u00e8re Sud des USA).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Trump est candidat pour les primaires r\u00e9publicaines (il le fut d\u00e9j\u00e0 en 1996 et n’y fut pas ridicule). Éventuellement, on pourrait croire que dans l’uniformit\u00e9 extraordinairement m\u00e9diocre et corrompue de la politique US, Trump pourrait amener un peu de d\u00e9sordre bienvenu, de type antiSyst\u00e8me, au milieu du duel annonc\u00e9 Hillary Clinton-Jeb Bush. S’il voit que le Politburo<\/em> du parti r\u00e9publicain veut lui barrer la route, il peut choisir d’\u00eatre candidat ind\u00e9pendant. Une analogie \u00e0 cet \u00e9gard est celle du milliardaire Ross Perrot, qui obtint un r\u00e9sultat remarquable de 18% de voix en 1992 comme candidat ind\u00e9pendant. Le temps d’alors \u00e9tait celui d’un d\u00e9sarroi US prononc\u00e9 (\u00ab\u00a0une crise d’identit\u00e9<\/a>\u00ab\u00a0, \u00e9crivait William Pfaff), mais \u00e0 des ann\u00e9es-lumi\u00e8re du d\u00e9sordre de la Grande Crise g\u00e9n\u00e9rale d’aujourd’hui qui peut faire naître des circonstances exceptionnelles. Dans UNZ.com<\/em>, Ilina Mercer fait un portrait somme toute flatteur de Trump, ce 19 juin 2015<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\n

«…Trump claims he opposed the invasion of Iraq. If this is true, it would make him better than almost all his Republican competitors, who mulishly continue to justify the most disastrous military campaign in American history (besides the War Between The States). Decisive and to the point was Trump about liberalizing ties with Cuba: \u00ab\u00a0It’s time!\u00a0\u00bb he stated. The man who wrote \u00ab\u00a0The Art of The Deal,\u00a0\u00bb however, would rather a \u00ab\u00a0deal\u00a0\u00bb with Cuba favored ordinary Americans and Cubans, and would know how to \u00ab\u00a0deliver the goods.\u00a0\u00bb We inhabit a world of managed, not free, trade. Trump is no rent-seeking political rat like every other Republican competing for the throne (besides Ben Carson, who is similarly motivated). Better than any self-interested politician, Trump can probably negotiate winning deals on all Treaties in Force, to the benefit of Americans.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

»\u00ab\u00a0I’m really rich,\u00a0\u00bb Trump swanked disarmingly. Being independently and stupendously wealthy means that this American individualist can continue to march to his own drumbeat; be as blunt and bold as he wants and pander to nobody. \u00ab\u00a0His fellow GOP presidential candidates,\u00a0\u00bb explained Trump, are \u00ab\u00a0totally controlled by their donors, by the lobbyists and by the special interests. If we have another politician, this country’s going down. … I’ve watched the politicians, I’ve dealt with them all my life. They will never make America great again. They don’t even have a chance.\u00a0\u00bb<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

»In the productive, non-parasitical economy, Trump has been enormously successful. Career politicians have created the hot mess that is America. The Founding Fathers wanted regular citizens to serve the public, not live off it as a vocation. Such upstanding Americans were to return to their careers after serving. The consummate homo economicus, Trump is a rational actor in the market place. Unlike the rest of the GOP contenders who’re guided by political calculations; Trump speaks like a man to whom rational economic choices are second nature. And so he gets that the \u00ab\u00a0stock market is bloated\u00a0\u00bb; that the Stock Exchange is a laughing stock, and that soaring stock prices are a consequence of centrally planned, monetary stimulus.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

»The business mogul surprised Bill O’Reilly with the revelation that he’d \u00ab\u00a0have a great relationship with Vladimir Putin.\u00a0\u00bb This is a good thing. Whereas in the past, Trump was motivated by the sense that the nimbus of great power that surrounds the U.S. was dissipating—he now seems prepared to search closer to home for the causes of America’s economic inertia. Also to O’Reilly, Trump \u00ab\u00a0promised to build a wall along the southern border and make Mexico pay for it. ‘The Factor’ host stated that there’s no way they will pay for it.\u00a0\u00bb Although Bill is likelier than Dana Perino to comprehend the workings of tax and trade policy, Trump opted to calm the host down: \u00ab\u00a0You have to let me handle that. They will pay for the wall, and the wall will go up.\u00a0\u00bb D.C. insider Perino hit the roof: \u00ab\u00a0On what planet is that actually true? Do you think you can make Mexico pay for a permanent wall between Mexico and the United States?\u00a0\u00bb You can do that?\u00a0\u00bb<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

»A guide to the perpetually perplexed: Trump must be thinking of taking the populist path advocated by Pat Buchanan, whose patriotism is unimpeachable: tariffs. Levying a tariff on Mexico could indeed pay for a wall. Trade tariffs are not this libertarian’s bag. But walling off the deluge of Democrats crossing the southwest border is…<\/em>»<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/p>\n

Mis en ligne le 20 juin 2015 \u00e0 11H46<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Trump est-il une trump card ? Une de nos lectrices nous ayant demand\u00e9 ce que dedefensa.org pensait de la candidature pr\u00e9sidentielle du milliardaire Donald Trump, – qui n’en est pas \u00e0 sa premi\u00e8re tentative, – nous r\u00e9pondrons que nous ne savons (pas encore?) quoi penser sinon qu’une telle candidature ne peut en aucun cas \u00eatre… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[8743,3335,2943,16725,3340,3686,12708,2639,12709],"class_list":["post-75960","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-breves-de-crise","tag-8743","tag-buchanan","tag-mexique","tag-perrot","tag-presidentielles","tag-republicain","tag-tpp","tag-trump","tag-ttip"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75960","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=75960"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75960\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=75960"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=75960"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=75960"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}