Buy rumors but sell news<\/em>\u00bb). Pour faire bref, on r\u00e9sumera cela en trois points.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t Le premier est que l’\u00e9tau se resserre sur Hillary Clinton, pour son affaire d’e-mails<\/em> couverts par le secret et utilisant le privil\u00e8ge d’influence de la secr\u00e9taire d’\u00c9tat, utilis\u00e9s \u00e0 des fins de collecter de l’argent pour la fondation qu’elle dirige avec son mari. Une enqu\u00eate officielle est de plus en plus probable, qui aurait toutes les chances de pulv\u00e9riser litt\u00e9ralement la candidature d’Hillary en 2016. Les pressions s’accentuent pour que le vice-pr\u00e9sident Joe Biden, qui ferait un bien pi\u00e8tre candidat, annonce sa candidature officielle pour 2016. Armstrong estime que les d\u00e9mocrates devraient perdre les \u00e9lections de 2016.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t Si Donald Trump est accept\u00e9 par le parti r\u00e9publicain, o\u00f9 il est plus que jamais favori, il a toutes les chances de gagner. Mais les caciques du parti, men\u00e9s par le Speaker<\/em> de la Chambre John Boehner, sont in\u00e9branlablement et visc\u00e9ralement contre lui, ce qui rend tr\u00e8s improbable une possibilit\u00e9 de d\u00e9signation. On sait par ailleurs que tous les autres candidats \u00e0 la d\u00e9signation r\u00e9publicaine, rench\u00e9rissant en fait de m\u00e9diocrit\u00e9, accumulent des scores d’une impopularit\u00e9 consternante au sein du parti r\u00e9publicain, et au-del\u00e0, au niveau national.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t Il reste alors la possibilit\u00e9 d’un \u00e9clatement du parti r\u00e9publicain entre pro- et anti-Trump, ou celle d’un troisi\u00e8me parti de type-ind\u00e9pendant qui serait celui de Trump. Cette possibilit\u00e9-l\u00e0 ach\u00e8verait de transformer l’\u00e9lection de 2016 aux USA en une \u00e9pop\u00e9e qui tiendrait d’une aventure r\u00e9volutionnaire dont nul ne peut dire ce qu’il en r\u00e9sulterait, et ce qui en resterait du Syst\u00e8me lui-m\u00eame.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tPaysage extraordinaire par les non moins extraordinaires contraction du Temps et acc\u00e9l\u00e9ration de l’Histoire. En deux mois, les \u00e9lections les plus verrouill\u00e9es de l’histoire \u00e9lectorale US (Hillary versus<\/em> Jeb Bush) se sont transform\u00e9es en une perspective totalement incontr\u00f4lables et impr\u00e9visible, et par cons\u00e9quent v\u00e9ritablement r\u00e9volutionnaire sans qu’aucun \u00e9l\u00e9ment au d\u00e9part antiSyst\u00e8me<\/strong> ne soit intervenu. Le Syst\u00e8me se suffit \u00e0 lui-m\u00eame pour la d\u00e9stabilisation de lui-m\u00eame.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00abBehind the curtain more and more Democrats are trying to urge Joe Biden to run for President since the Inspector General suggested that Hillary should be criminally investigated for deleting emails and taking hundreds of million of dollars from foreign government while Secretary of State for he pretend charity. Our computer model had warned that the Democrats should lose 2016. However, we also saw the potential for a split in the Republicans forming a 3rd Party.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbTrump is doing amazingly well because he is effectively anti-politician and that is the rise of the discontent we have seen for 2016. If he stays within the Republicans’ camp, true the machine will try to rig the game against him. This is Rand Paul’s fatal mistake. He is trying to stay within the fold. You will never achieve political reform from within. It has never been done. Even Teddy Roosevelt split to for his Progressive Party embracing Marxist socialism all because they failed to understand how the economy was evolving.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbWhile the news claims that 50% of the Republican Party is against Trump, that is the die hard professionals for they want to keep things as they are. If Trump actually stayed within the Republican Party, then if he becomes the candidate he would win. The trouble is getting to that position of candidate because Boehner will do whatever it takes to ensure Trump does not get that position. Boehner is clearly the worse enemy of the Republican Party itself. Boehner has sided with Obama against his own party to keep Washington as Washington the country club for the rulers of the world.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 3 ao\u00fbt 2015 \u00e0 10H33<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Comment la pr\u00e9sidentielle-2016, USA, pourrait \u00eatre r\u00e9volutionnaire Une courte note de Martin Armstrong, ce 3 ao\u00fbt 2015 sur son site ArmstrongEconomics.com r\u00e9sume la situation des rumeurs aujourd’hui \u00e0 Washington (\u00abBuy rumors but sell news\u00bb). Pour faire bref, on r\u00e9sumera cela en trois points. Le premier est que l’\u00e9tau se resserre sur Hillary Clinton, pour son… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[8743,13630,1235,10771,3009,12595,3278,3340,3686,2639],"class_list":["post-76044","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-breves-de-crise","tag-8743","tag-armstrong","tag-biden","tag-boehner","tag-democrates","tag-e-mails","tag-hillary","tag-presidentielles","tag-republicain","tag-trump"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76044","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=76044"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76044\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=76044"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=76044"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=76044"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}