{"id":76165,"date":"2015-10-12T11:06:46","date_gmt":"2015-10-12T11:06:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2015\/10\/12\/le-bloc-bao-et-daesh-un-coup-jte-vois-un-coup-jte-vois-pas\/"},"modified":"2015-10-12T11:06:46","modified_gmt":"2015-10-12T11:06:46","slug":"le-bloc-bao-et-daesh-un-coup-jte-vois-un-coup-jte-vois-pas","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2015\/10\/12\/le-bloc-bao-et-daesh-un-coup-jte-vois-un-coup-jte-vois-pas\/","title":{"rendered":"Le bloc BAO et Daesh<\/em>\u00a0: un coup j’te vois, un coup j’te vois pas"},"content":{"rendered":"

Le bloc BAO et Daesh<\/em> : un coup j’te vois, un coup j’te vois pas<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n

… Il est vrai que, durant cette ann\u00e9e au cours de laquelle le bloc BAO, flamboyants USA en t\u00eate, ont men\u00e9 leur grande campagne contre Daesh<\/em>, les r\u00e9sultats, – d’une maigreur de grande famine, – ont \u00e9t\u00e9 extraordinaires d’insignifiance. On nous expliqua parfois que les groupes terroristes \u00e9taient tr\u00e8s difficiles \u00e0 identifier, sinon m\u00eame \u00e0 localiser, et tout le monde regretta grandement cette incroyable habilet\u00e9 de l’État Islamique \u00e0 se balader dans le d\u00e9sert comme si c’\u00e9tait les Champs Elys\u00e9es \u00e0 l’heure de pointe ou le Sahara \u00e0 l’heure des vents du simoun levant des temp\u00eates de sable aveuglant m\u00eame les puissants radars et satellites.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

L\u00e0-dessus, tout change. Le d\u00e9compte que font l’OTAN, les USA & consorts des objectifs attaqu\u00e9s par les Russes est au millim\u00e8tre pr\u00e8s, et chacun parfaitement identifi\u00e9 comme s’il portait une affiche gigantesque destin\u00e9es aux observateurs du Ciel, avec son affiliation, da marqued\u00e9pos\u00e9e, etc., en arabe et en anglais (et m\u00eame en russe, c’est dire). Ainsi, nos virtuoses BAO de l’identification sont capables de vous dire combien de cible-Daesh<\/em> ont attaqu\u00e9 les Russes (en nombre ridiculement bas) et combien de cibles-\u00ab\u00a0terroristes sympas\u00a0\u00bb, because<\/em> anti-Assad quoiqu’extr\u00e9mistes comme vous et moi, ont attaqu\u00e9 les Russes (en nombre monstrueusement \u00e9lev\u00e9). Finian Cunningham s’interroge sur cet autisme persistant du regard n\u00e9buleux suivi de l’oeil d’aigle retrouv\u00e9 et y trouve mati\u00e8re \u00e0 suspicion<\/a> (sur Strategic-Culture.org<\/em>, le 11 octobre 2015). On ne peut pas le lui reprocher. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

« After a year of bombing the Syrian desert with negligible results in terms of defeating terror groups – as memorably noted by Russian lawmaker Alexei Pushkov – all of a sudden the so-called anti-terror coalition led by the United States seems to have discovered a high degree of logistical precision. The US and its allies claim that Russian air strikes, commencing on September 30, have failed to hit the jihadis of Islamic State (IS, ISIS or ISIL), also known as Daesh. Russia, according to Washington and the Western news media, has been striking \u00ab\u00a0moderate rebels\u00a0\u00bb and civilians, and in the process shoring up the \u00ab\u00a0regime\u00a0\u00bb of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

» There’s nothing amiss under international law about supporting the sovereign government of Syria, as Russian President Vladimir Putin has recently stipulated. So let’s kick that Western objection out first of all. As for alleged civilian casualties, CNN, BBC, France 24 and so on have so far not provided one report of funerals or hospital scenes, to verify their earlier high-flown accusations. And this after more than a week since the alleged Russian \u00ab\u00a0atrocities\u00a0\u00bb began. But what is telling about the latest Western protests over Russia’s military intervention is the apparent omniscient precision about who and where the terror groups are.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

» Washington officials and Jens Stoltenberg, the secretary-general of the US-led NATO military alliance, this week claimed that \u00ab\u00a0over 90 per cent of Russian air strikes were not against ISIS or Al Qaeda\u00a0\u00bb. The US and NATO’s precise enumeration chimes with that of Turkey’s Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu, who claimed that \u00ab\u00a0only two out of 57 Russian air strikes in Syria\u00a0\u00bb hit IS targets. The question that the supine Western media should be asking the NATO chief and his Washington superiors is this: if you can so clearly quantify and delineate the IS and Al Qaeda bases, then why has the US-led coalition evidently been wasting 12 months bombing empty desert spaces instead of degrading and defeating these groups, as vowed by US President Barack Obama over a year ago?<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

» Since September 2014, the US and some 60 other allied nations, including NATO members, as well as Saudi Arabia and Qatar, have been bombing Syria and Iraq with the stated purpose of wiping out the IS terror network. So far, more than 9,000 air strikes have been carried out by the US-led coalition, but until Russia opened up its air campaign more than a week ago, the IS and other jihadis had been steadily growing in strength and territory – despite all that US-led air power supposedly raining down on them.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

» By contrast, Russia’s air strikes in Syria appear to have achieved more in one week than Washington’s coalition has in more than one year… <\/em>»<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Mis en ligne le 12 octobre 2015 \u00e0 11H05<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Le bloc BAO et Daesh : un coup j’te vois, un coup j’te vois pas … Il est vrai que, durant cette ann\u00e9e au cours de laquelle le bloc BAO, flamboyants USA en t\u00eate, ont men\u00e9 leur grande campagne contre Daesh, les r\u00e9sultats, – d’une maigreur de grande famine, – ont \u00e9t\u00e9 extraordinaires d’insignifiance. On… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[5253,1571,12572,14428,13253,9878,2730,3867,2993],"class_list":["post-76165","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-breves-de-crise","tag-coalition","tag-cunningham","tag-daesh","tag-desert","tag-identification","tag-objectif","tag-russie","tag-syrie","tag-terroristes"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76165","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=76165"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76165\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=76165"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=76165"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=76165"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}