{"id":76192,"date":"2015-10-26T05:35:43","date_gmt":"2015-10-26T05:35:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2015\/10\/26\/la-syrie-comme-spoutnik-1957-8\/"},"modified":"2015-10-26T05:35:43","modified_gmt":"2015-10-26T05:35:43","slug":"la-syrie-comme-spoutnik-1957-8","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2015\/10\/26\/la-syrie-comme-spoutnik-1957-8\/","title":{"rendered":"La Syrie comme <em>Spoutnik<\/em>-1957"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><h2 class=\"titleset_b.deepblue\" style=\"color:#0f3955; font-size:1.65em; font-variant:small-caps\">La Syrie comme <em>Spoutnik<\/em>-1957<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>On a, venue d&rsquo;une autre source, le renforcement du sentiment d&rsquo;une r\u00e9elle popularit\u00e9 en Russie, &ndash; \u00e9tonnante sinon incroyable pour certains, \u00ab\u00a0propagande pure\u00a0\u00bb pour d&rsquo;autres, &ndash; de l&rsquo;intervention en Syrie, ce sentiment se r\u00e9percutant \u00e9videmment sur la popularit\u00e9 et la l\u00e9gitimit\u00e9 de l&rsquo;actuelle direction politique. Il s&rsquo;agit ici de <a href=\"http:\/\/www.unz.com\/ishamir\/secrets-of-syrian-war-october-2015\/\">l&rsquo;appr\u00e9ciation d&rsquo;Isra\u00ebl Shamir<\/a> (dans <em>UNZ.com<\/em>, le 22 octobre 2015), qui n&rsquo;est pas une source conventionnelle et qui donne un commentaire en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral original et bien inform\u00e9 ; en aucun cas, on ne peut le classer dans la cat\u00e9gorie des commentateurs \u00ab\u00a0officiels\u00a0\u00bb, quelque chose comme une simple \u00ab\u00a0voix de son ma&icirc;tre\u00a0\u00bb(le ma&icirc;tre \u00e9tant naturellement le Kremlin).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>L&rsquo;appr\u00e9ciation de Shamir confirme le sondage r\u00e9cemment relev\u00e9 sur <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article\/poutine-en-syrie-na-jamais-ete-aussi-populaire-en-russie\">la popularit\u00e9 de Poutine<\/a> : les Russes, dit Shamir, sont aussi heureux et fiers que lorsque, \u00e9tant Sovi\u00e9tiques, leur pays lan\u00e7a le premier satellite artificiel, le fameux <em>Spoutnik<\/em>, en octobre 1957. Ce sentiment populaire constitue un facteur important qui, s&rsquo;il se confirme, doit jouer et jouera un r\u00f4le non n\u00e9gligeable d&rsquo;influence dans la politique russe. Dans tous les cas, il m\u00e9rite certainement une attention sp\u00e9cifique, et \u00e9galement une analyseparticuli\u00e8re.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>&laquo; <em>Russians are enjoying their Syrian adventure. Twenty days after its start, their entry into the Syrian war has paid off and brought some dividends. They displayed their military toys and duly impressed other boys in the sandbox. After a long period of despondency the Russians have now been cheered up, thank you, they feel much better, as a man convalescing after a grave disease. They like the pictures of their pilots in American-style top-military-chic overalls, of their exquisite ultra-modern jets, of the sheer audacity of this campaign so far from home. They like the new publicity of their military operations, unprecedented for this country. Their MoD posts videos and allows them to follow the attacks and the hits in real time.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>&raquo; <em>Putin has been very popular before the war, with 86% support in the ratings, and now his public support has gone through the roof. The best of it, from the Russian point of view, was the daring launch of their 26 brand new Kalibr cruise missiles from a frigate in the Caspian Sea all the way to Syria over the hills and deserts of Iraq and Iran. Though Iraq and Iran had been warned, they did not leak the news to their US partners. The missiles made perfect hits, and military experts say this new class of cruise missiles would allow Russia, if necessary, to take care of the US missile shield installations in neighbouring East European countries. The Russians were pleased as on the day they launched their first Sputnik.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>&raquo; <em>The Syrian campaign has been so popular that an attempt to organise an anti-war demo failed spectacularly: only one hundred fifty persons gathered, in all of 15 million strong Moscow. By comparison, demos against Ukrainian involvement attracted a few thousand protesters at least<\/em>&#8230; &raquo;<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>Mis en ligne le 26 octobre 2015 \u00e0 06H33<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>La Syrie comme Spoutnik-1957 On a, venue d&rsquo;une autre source, le renforcement du sentiment d&rsquo;une r\u00e9elle popularit\u00e9 en Russie, &ndash; \u00e9tonnante sinon incroyable pour certains, \u00ab\u00a0propagande pure\u00a0\u00bb pour d&rsquo;autres, &ndash; de l&rsquo;intervention en Syrie, ce sentiment se r\u00e9percutant \u00e9videmment sur la popularit\u00e9 et la l\u00e9gitimit\u00e9 de l&rsquo;actuelle direction politique. Il s&rsquo;agit ici de l&rsquo;appr\u00e9ciation d&rsquo;Isra\u00ebl&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[8173,2774,5235,916,2884,10466,17061,3867],"class_list":["post-76192","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-breves-de-crise","tag-intervention","tag-israel","tag-popularite","tag-poutine","tag-russe","tag-shamir","tag-spoutnik-i","tag-syrie"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76192","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=76192"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76192\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=76192"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=76192"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=76192"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}