Le commentateur Gordon M. Hahn d\u00e9veloppe l’hypoth\u00e8se, en nous promettant des \u00e9l\u00e9ments suppl\u00e9mentaires pour la corroborer, selon laquelle les informations pass\u00e9es par la DIA \u00e0 la Russie (avec l’accord du chef d’\u00e9tat-major g\u00e9n\u00e9ral<\/a>, le pr\u00e9sident du JCS, G\u00e9n\u00e9ral Dempsey) ont jou\u00e9 un r\u00f4le important dans la d\u00e9cision de Poutine d’intervenir en Syrie. Il s’agit des r\u00e9v\u00e9lations faites par Seymour Hersh<\/a> dans le London Review of Books<\/em>, suivant et corroborant certains aspects des r\u00e9v\u00e9lations du G\u00e9n\u00e9ral Flynn<\/a>, ancien directeur de la DIA.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Hahn, qui ne semble douter en rien des r\u00e9v\u00e9lations de Hersh promet qu’il va apporter des compl\u00e9ments sur l’aspect qui l’int\u00e9resse le plus. Pour lui, plusieurs hypoth\u00e8ses renforcent sa th\u00e8se selon laquelle les informations venues de ces sources militaires US, et particuli\u00e8rement le fait m\u00eame de cette initiative prise par les chefs militaires US, ont convaincu Poutine qu’il pouvait, et \u00e9ventuellement qu’il devait agir en Syrie. Hahn semble faire une part importante de ce que ces initiatives des g\u00e9n\u00e9raux ont apport\u00e9 \u00e0 l’\u00e9valuation personnelle de Poutine, quant \u00e0 la situation politique \u00e0 Washington, notamment l’extr\u00eame faiblesse de la Maison-Blanche, la division de l’administration vis-\u00e0-vis de la crise syrienne et de la Syrie ; l’inutilit\u00e9 d’attendre une action s\u00e9rieuse des USA contre les groupes terroristes ; la probabilit\u00e9 que l’intervention russe ne susciterait pas de r\u00e9action pr\u00e9occupante des USA. (Sur le terrain, il semble que l’intervention russe, d\u00e9sormais bien coordonn\u00e9e avec les actions kurdes et irakiennes, ait notablement acc\u00e9l\u00e9r\u00e9 le processus d’affaiblissement de Daesh<\/em> et du reste des extr\u00e9mistes. L’excellent commentateur koweitien Elijah J.M. le laisse entendre \u00e0 partir d’une analyse du comportement<\/a> du dirigeant de Daesh<\/em> Baghdadi, le 6 janvier.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Le texte de Hahn a \u00e9t\u00e9 publi\u00e9 sur Russia Insider <\/em>le 7 janvier 2016<\/a>. (Le site de Gordon H. Hahn<\/a>, universitaire devenu consultant et sp\u00e9cialiste des questions russes, publie aussi le texte ainsi que d’autres \u00e9tudes tr\u00e8s int\u00e9ressantes.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n « Recently, a series of revelations have revealed that Putin’s decision was also influenced by the fecklessness of the Barack Obama administration’s destructive policy in the fight against the global jihad and the Islamic State.I will disclose other details and a more broad analysis soon, but for now I will discuss the implications of revelations contained in Seymour Hersh’s recent article in the London Review of Books<\/em>. […]<\/p>\n<\/p>\n » If Hersh’s source is reporting accurately, then it is very likely that the U.S. military contact with Moscow, the evidence of grave dissent within the administration that this interaction represented, and the nature of the intel provided to the Russian military influenced Putin’s decision to intervene in several ways<\/em>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n » First<\/em><\/strong>, these factors would have definitively confirmed for Putin the fecklessness of the Obama administration in general, given its full alienation of, and its inability to control the military. Second<\/strong>, they would have shown Moscow that little could be expected from U.S. efforts to contain IS and the other jihadists in Syria and elsewhere along the southern Eurasian arc of Islamic states stretching along Russia’s south. Third<\/strong>, they demonstrated to the Kremlin that there would be elements within the Obama administration that might eventually force it to come to terms to any Russian military intervention in Syria. Fourth<\/strong>, these factors as well as the specific nature of the intelligence itself must have suggested to Putin that Russian operations and intelligence subsequently received during operations could be used to expose the pathetic nature of the U.S. administration and its policies, further undermining American hegemony and allowing Russia to seize the mantle or some of the status as the global power fighting the global jihadi revolutionary movement effectively.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n » One might recall that after Moscow began its military intervention, the Russians requested and Putin reiterated the request in a television interview, that the U.S. provide it intelligence so it could hit IS targets, which the Obama administration and the Defense Department were saying Russian warplanes were not attacking. This would have been a rather clever gambit, given that the Pentagon had already been doing this, either to acquire more intelligence or to rub Pentagon’s face in its hapless position under Obama’s rule.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n » As I will demonstrate shortly, Hersh’s reporting largely coincides with the contents of recently released DIA documents, and the Obama administration’s insistence on arming Muslim rebels, provoking Putin in Ukraine, and refusing to join forces with Moscow in the fight against the global jihad correlate nicely with the friends from the Muslim world that the Obama administration keeps<\/em>. »<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Mis en ligne le 7 janvier 2016 \u00e0 16H06<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Comment la DIA a pouss\u00e9 Poutine \u00e0 intervenir en Syrie Le commentateur Gordon M. Hahn d\u00e9veloppe l’hypoth\u00e8se, en nous promettant des \u00e9l\u00e9ments suppl\u00e9mentaires pour la corroborer, selon laquelle les informations pass\u00e9es par la DIA \u00e0 la Russie (avec l’accord du chef d’\u00e9tat-major g\u00e9n\u00e9ral, le pr\u00e9sident du JCS, G\u00e9n\u00e9ral Dempsey) ont jou\u00e9 un r\u00f4le important dans… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[17266,12572,11165,3032,6301,2926,5147,17265,2786,916,3867,2671],"class_list":["post-76344","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-breves-de-crise","tag-bagdhadi","tag-daesh","tag-dempsey","tag-dia","tag-faiblesse","tag-flynn","tag-gordon","tag-hahn","tag-m","tag-poutine","tag-syrie","tag-us"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76344","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=76344"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76344\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=76344"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=76344"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=76344"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}