{"id":76373,"date":"2016-01-22T07:14:18","date_gmt":"2016-01-22T07:14:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2016\/01\/22\/la-stealthy-revolution-des-presidentielles-us-se-poursuit\/"},"modified":"2016-01-22T07:14:18","modified_gmt":"2016-01-22T07:14:18","slug":"la-stealthy-revolution-des-presidentielles-us-se-poursuit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2016\/01\/22\/la-stealthy-revolution-des-presidentielles-us-se-poursuit\/","title":{"rendered":"La \u201cstealthy revolution<\/em>\u201d des pr\u00e9sidentielles US se poursuit"},"content":{"rendered":"

La \u00ab\u00a0stealthy revolution<\/em>\u00a0\u00bb des pr\u00e9sidentielles US se poursuit<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n

Le silence est consid\u00e9rable et assourdissant dans la presse-Syst\u00e8me europ\u00e9enne par rapport \u00e0 cet \u00e9v\u00e9nement en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral consid\u00e9rable et assourdissant pour la presse-Syst\u00e8me que sont les \u00e9lections pr\u00e9sidentielles US. Il est vrai que rien ne marche \u00ab\u00a0selon le plan pr\u00e9vu\u00a0\u00bb, quce ce soit le Plan A, le Plan B, le Plan C… Ce \u00ab\u00a0plan pr\u00e9vu\u00a0\u00bb, ou plan-alphabet, c’est-\u00e0-dire le triomphe progressiste et postmoderniste de l’establishment<\/em> et, plus pr\u00e9cis\u00e9ment, de la scintillante Hillary, favorite des salons pour ses multiples vertus, – notamment celle d’\u00eatre une femme, celle d’\u00eatre une interventionniste acharn\u00e9e comme croisement vertueux des neocons<\/em> et des R2P, celle \u00e0 la fois d’\u00eatre couverte d’argent durement gagn\u00e9e au travers des pr\u00e9bendes et des donations et d’\u00eatre la femme du s\u00e9duisant Bill.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\n

Rien de tout cela. Au contraire, la campagne est monopolis\u00e9e par deux candidats qui ne correspondent en rien au profil bien connu ; d’une part, Donald Trump The Donald<\/em>, d\u00e9j\u00e0 bien connu, et d’autre part Bernie Sanders chez les d\u00e9mocrates, dont on parle de plus en plus. A ce point, leurs programmes nous importent fort peu parce que l’\u00e9v\u00e9nement essentiel, qui efface tous les autres et toutes les sp\u00e9culations id\u00e9ologiques et autres, est qu’ils sont tous deux, chacun dans leurs partis, le contraire du candidat de l’establishment<\/em> et qu’ils sont en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral ha\u00efs par le susdit<\/strong>. Toutes les sp\u00e9culations et hypoth\u00e8ses de manœuvres \u00e0 leur \u00e9gard de l’establishment<\/em> sont pour l’instant absolument secondaires devant ce fait massif, fondamental, et fort peu m\u00e9diatis\u00e9 bien entendu : une extraordinaire r\u00e9volution furtive (\u00ab\u00a0stealthy revolution<\/em>\u00ab\u00a0) est en cours aux USA<\/strong>… Contre elle, la presse-Syst\u00e8me, surtout en Europe dont le citoyen-lambda<\/em> n’est inform\u00e9 de rien \u00e0 cet \u00e9gard, d\u00e9ploie son arme principale et suppos\u00e9e absolue : le silence, qu’il soit celui des agneaux ou celui des autruches.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Cette fois, l’accent est mis sur Sanders, qui ne cesse de gagner du terrain sur Hillary, dont l’impopularit\u00e9 et la r\u00e9putation de candidate absolument corrompue par le Syst\u00e8me grandissent \u00e0 chacune de ses apparitions. (Cette courbe descendante d’Hillary Clinton, comme une bulle qui se d\u00e9gonfle, est certainement le fait objectif, ind\u00e9pendant de tout acte politique, le plus impressionnant, et une v\u00e9rit\u00e9-de-situation effectivement \u00ab\u00a0r\u00e9volutionnaire\u00a0\u00bb<\/strong>.) Les derniers sondages pour les premi\u00e8res primaires montrent Sanders dans une position de plus en plus forte, \u00e0 la grande satisfaction de Eric Zuesse, du Washington’s blog<\/em>. Zuesse a pronostiqu\u00e9 d\u00e8s juillet dernier l’\u00e9lection comme 45\u00e8me<\/sup> pr\u00e9sident des USA de Sanders, d’où effectivement son intense satisfaction<\/a> ce 21 janvier (« N.H. Poll Indicates Sanders Will Win Democratic Nomination, then the Presidency<\/em> ») …<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

« The latest New Hampshire Democratic primary poll indicates not only a current reality in that state, but an underlying and far more important national trend, a trend exhibited in N.H. that has bearing more broadly throughout the country, and that shows U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders already well on the road toward locking up the Democratic nomination, barring any future game-changing disclosures about one or both candidates, which are always possibilities in any political contest, and can never be ruled out. The same poll also shows Sanders performing more strongly against any Republican than Hillary Clinton would. This is not the way things looked to most prognosticators back on April 30th when Sanders started his campaign.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

» On June 1st<\/em> [2015], I bannered, \u00ab\u00a0My Prediction: Bernie Sanders Will Win the White House,\u00a0\u00bb<\/a> based upon the early indications being clear, even then, that he would have a higher net-favorability rating from likely Democratic Presidential primary voters than Hillary Clinton. (The same analysis, from many polls, indicated also that Sanders would likely beat any Republican candidate in the general election.) Whereas far more Democrats at that time were familiar with Clinton than with Sanders, and therefore Clinton scored far higher in the national polls then than he did (and so she was presumed to be the contest’s front-runner), the determinant of the future trendline for any candidate is net-favorability ratings, especially comparing \u00ab\u00a0strongly approve\u00a0\u00bb versus \u00ab\u00a0strongly disapprove,\u00a0\u00bb which ratios tend to be, especially at such an early stage in a contest, a far better predictor of the contest’s ultimate winner than are the sheer poll-numbers at such a time. What the latest New Hampshire poll, taken now near the end of the contest in N.H., shows, is that the campaign in New Hampshire, as it is nearing its end, is increasingly displaying a strong edge over Clinton that Sanders has on this most crucial of all ratios, which is propelling him toward a substantial margin of victory in this, the first, primary state<\/em>. »<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Mis en ligne le 22 janvier 2016 \u00e0 07H15<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

La \u00ab\u00a0stealthy revolution\u00a0\u00bb des pr\u00e9sidentielles US se poursuit Le silence est consid\u00e9rable et assourdissant dans la presse-Syst\u00e8me europ\u00e9enne par rapport \u00e0 cet \u00e9v\u00e9nement en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral consid\u00e9rable et assourdissant pour la presse-Syst\u00e8me que sont les \u00e9lections pr\u00e9sidentielles US. Il est vrai que rien ne marche \u00ab\u00a0selon le plan pr\u00e9vu\u00a0\u00bb, quce ce soit le Plan A, le… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[8743,934,7258,7356,3278,3256,3340,4741,7347,8327,16136,3050,2639,17309,12643],"class_list":["post-76373","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-breves-de-crise","tag-8743","tag-clinton","tag-donald","tag-hampshire","tag-hillary","tag-new","tag-presidentielles","tag-presse-systeme","tag-primaires","tag-sanders","tag-silence","tag-the","tag-trump","tag-vernie","tag-zuesse"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76373","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=76373"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76373\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=76373"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=76373"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=76373"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}