Il est difficile de suivre les \u00e9carts de The Donald<\/em> dans la campagne \u00e9lectorale. Il est plus tonitruant que jamais, bousculant avec une \u00e9nergie vorace les divers tabous et sortil\u00e8ges sur lesquels s’appuie l’establishment<\/em>-Syst\u00e8me de Washington. Le candidat r\u00e9publicain est plus que jamais persuad\u00e9 que sa tactique, que l’on pourrait d\u00e9signer presque comme une strat\u00e9gie de l'\u00a0\u00bbiconoclastisme\u00a0\u00bb, va lui assurer la nomination et la victoire<\/strong>. Aux derni\u00e8res nouvelles, selon le Washington Examiner<\/em><\/a>, The Donald<\/em> m\u00e8ne tr\u00e8s largement dans la primaire de Caroline du Sud apr\u00e8s-demain : sept sondages sur place, parmi les \u00e9lecteurs concern\u00e9s, lui donnent un avantage de 14-22 points sur le suivant (Cruz), ce qui selon l’Examiner<\/em> lui assure la victoire \u00ab\u00a0\u00e0 moins d’un effondrement d’ici samedi\u00a0\u00bb (« Given his campaign thus far, it’s hard to imagine what could cause him to collapse<\/em>. »)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Mais le plus important est sa derni\u00e8re foucade où il a fait tr\u00e8s fort, s’attaquant au plus formidable des tabous : la v\u00e9rit\u00e9 sur 9\/11<\/strong>. Lors d’une intervention dans une r\u00e9union \u00e9lectorale \u00e0 Bluffton, en Caroline du Sud, Trump a promis que, s’il \u00e9tait \u00e9lu, la v\u00e9rit\u00e9 serait faite sur l’attaque du 11 septembre 2001. Il a essentiellement fait allusion aux 28 pages gard\u00e9es secr\u00e8tes<\/a> du rapport du gouvernement US sur l’attaque. (Il faut d’ailleurs noter que Trump ne va pas vraiment \u00e0 contre-courant : le soutien pour la publication de ces 28 pages a fortement augment\u00e9 au Congr\u00e8s, et l’on d\u00e9compte<\/a> d\u00e9sormais 35 parlementaires \u00e0 la Chambre des Repr\u00e9sentants qui se sont port\u00e9s \u00ab\u00a0cosponsors<\/em>\u00a0\u00bb du projet de r\u00e9solution<\/strong> demandant cette publication.) Parall\u00e8lement, l’ancien ex-pr\u00e9sident Cheney a d\u00e9nonc\u00e9 Trump<\/a> comme un \u00ab\u00a0complotiste\u00a0\u00bb diabolique (traduction fran\u00e7aise de \u00ab\u00a09\/11 Truther<\/em>\u00ab\u00a0)…<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Infowar.com<\/em> donne ce 18 f\u00e9vrier<\/a> des informations sur l’intervention de Trump \u00e0 Bluffton, où il a mis directement en cause les Saoudiens pour leur responsabilit\u00e9 dans la manufacture de l’attaque. (Cela, cette mise en cause, est l’impression g\u00e9n\u00e9rale obtenue aupr\u00e8s de divers parlementaires qui ont eu acc\u00e8s aux 28 pages \u00e0 condition de hgarder le secret sur leur contenu, certains \u00e9voquant leur stup\u00e9faction \u00e0 la lecture de ces pages.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n « Speaking at a campaign event in Bluffton, SC, Trump continued his onslaught on the Bush presidency by once again raising the issue of the attack on the World Trade Center on 9\/11\/2001. \u00ab\u00a0We went after Iraq, they did not knock down the World Trade Center.\u00a0\u00bb Trump told those in attendance. \u00ab\u00a0It wasn’t the Iraqis that knocked down the World Trade Center, we went after Iraq, we decimated the country, Iran’s taking over, okay.\u00a0\u00bb Trump continued. \u00ab\u00a0But it wasn’t the Iraqis, you will find out who really knocked down the World Trade Center. Because they have papers in there that are very secret, you may find it’s the Saudis, okay? But you will find out.\u00a0\u00bb \u00ab\u00a0But when I look at a guy like Lindsey Graham, you’ll end up being over in that war forever, you’ll start World War Three.\u00a0\u00bb Trump also noted.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n » Trump was referring to the 28 pages of the original Joint Congressional Inquiry into 9\/11, which remain classified and withheld from the public on grounds of ‘national security’.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n » Earlier in the week Trump doubled down on the 9\/11 accusations, stating \u00ab\u00a0I know that the CIA and various other agencies knew that something bad was going to happen and they did nothing about it. They got it wrong.\u00a0\u00bb \u00ab\u00a0The heads of the CIA and the various other agencies weren’t speaking and it was a big problem,\u00a0\u00bb Trump added. Trump’s comments have prompted establishment Republicans and conservative talking heads tolabel him a 9\/11 truther and a \u00ab\u00a0radical kook\u00a0\u00bb.<\/a><\/em> »<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Mis en ligne le 18 f\u00e9vrier 2016 \u00e0 17H56<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Élisez-moi, vous saurez la v\u00e9rit\u00e9 sur 9\/11 Il est difficile de suivre les \u00e9carts de The Donald dans la campagne \u00e9lectorale. Il est plus tonitruant que jamais, bousculant avec une \u00e9nergie vorace les divers tabous et sortil\u00e8ges sur lesquels s’appuie l’establishment-Syst\u00e8me de Washington. Le candidat r\u00e9publicain est plus que jamais persuad\u00e9 que sa tactique, que… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[354,16101,370,3350,3359,2651,17355,16102,7347,3300,2639,15598],"class_list":["post-76425","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-breves-de-crise","tag-354","tag-16101","tag-370","tag-caroline","tag-chambre","tag-du","tag-iconoclastisme","tag-pages","tag-primaires","tag-sud","tag-trump","tag-truther"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76425","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=76425"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76425\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=76425"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=76425"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=76425"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}\n