{"id":76448,"date":"2016-03-03T06:10:32","date_gmt":"2016-03-03T06:10:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2016\/03\/03\/douguine-sur-trump\/"},"modified":"2016-03-03T06:10:32","modified_gmt":"2016-03-03T06:10:32","slug":"douguine-sur-trump","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2016\/03\/03\/douguine-sur-trump\/","title":{"rendered":"Douguine sur Trump"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><h2 class=\"titleset_b.deepblue\" style=\"color:#0f3955; font-size:1.65em; font-variant:small-caps\">Douguine sur Trump<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>Voici un avis sur Donald Trump qui nous para&icirc;t tr\u00e8s int\u00e9ressant, et que nous mettons en \u00e9vidence pour le singulariser dans la masse des jugements qui d\u00e9ferlent actuellement \u00e0 propos du candidat \u00e0 l&rsquo;investiture \u00e0 la candidature r\u00e9publicaine. Il s&rsquo;agit de celui d&rsquo;Alexandre Douguine, l&rsquo;intellectuel russe ultra-nationaliste et traditionnaliste. Il est absolument approbateur, sinon enthousiaste, tout en fixant bien le cadre et les caract\u00e8res du parcours de Trump.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>Si l&rsquo;on s&rsquo;en tient \u00e0 ce qu&rsquo;on sait des conceptions de l&rsquo;un et de l&rsquo;autre, &ndash; clairement expos\u00e9es chez Douguine, confus\u00e9ment collect\u00e9es \u00e0 propos de <em>The Donald<\/em>, &ndash; on jugerait th\u00e9oriquement peu surprenante cette approbation. Ce qui est frappant, \u00e0 notre estime, c&rsquo;est la diff\u00e9rence radicale de caract\u00e8re, de croyance et de conscience historique s\u00e9parant Douguine de Trump. Ce contraste rend cette approbation peu ordinaire et dans tous les cas tr\u00e8s symbolique de la situation o&ugrave; nous vivons.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><p>Douguine est un Russe typique, avec tout le poids du respect pour la tradition, ses conceptions appuy\u00e9es sur le pass\u00e9, le pass\u00e9 historique de la Russie autant que sur la tradition puissante de la religion orthodoxe qui a tant particip\u00e9 \u00e0 la construction historique de la Russie. M\u00eame si l&rsquo;on ne peut les confondre, Douguine est un personnage \u00e0-la-Soljenitsyne, que tout dans le mode de vie, la fa\u00e7on d&rsquo;\u00eatre, les \u00ab\u00a0valeurs\u00a0\u00bb am\u00e9ricanistes et leur modernit\u00e9 effr\u00e9n\u00e9e, <strong>c&rsquo;est-\u00e0-dire tout dans ce qu&rsquo;on pourrait nommer l'\u00a0\u00bbapparence signifiante\u00a0\u00bb, suscite l&rsquo;hostilit\u00e9 la plus compl\u00e8te. Malgr\u00e9 son parcours actuel, Trump repr\u00e9sente sans aucun doute tout cela dans son \u00ab\u00a0apparence signifiante\u00a0\u00bb<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>Pourtant, il y a l&rsquo;approbation sans r\u00e9serve de Douguine (qu&rsquo;on pourrait en un sens faire \u00e9quivaloir \u00e0 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article\/la-connivencele-complot-poutine-the-donald\">l&rsquo;attitude de Poutine<\/a> vis-\u00e0-vis de Trump). La signification de cette attitude s&rsquo;explique \u00e0 notre sens par la puissance \u00e9crasante, qui rend tout le reste secondaire, du Syst\u00e8me ; et, pour Douguine, sans nul doute dans ses conceptions, le Syst\u00e8me c&rsquo;est le Mal \u00e0 visage d\u00e9couvert. Douguine a appr\u00e9ci\u00e9, justement \u00e0 notre sens, que <strong>Trump est un antiSyst\u00e8me, une menace terrible contre le Syst\u00e8me. Ce constat efface tout le reste et, malgr\u00e9 toutes les r\u00e9serves, Douguine en parle comme d&rsquo;un puissant apport \u00e0 la bataille antiSyst\u00e8me, la bataille contre le Mal.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><p>Ce texte est de Douguine directement, repris de son site et traduit en anglais par Elina Nigamatyanova pour <em>Russia Insider<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/russia-insider.com\/en\/politics\/russian-geopolitician-trump-real-america\/ri13152\">le 2 mars 2016<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>&laquo; <em>This week, America starts primaries season<\/em>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>&raquo; <em>If it wasn&rsquo;t for Donald Trump, it would be quite ordinary and without any surprises, even dull. He is, no doubt, the sensation of the elections. Donald Trump, of course, is more interesting then Obama. To choose a black Muslim democrat to conduct policies, who is not a whit different from the white protestant fundamentalist-republican candidate, is a real PR success. But it is impossible to repeat such steps again; the democrats have presented the quite annoying Hilary. In fact, she would be first woman-president, since gender is a trend, but, anyway, it not that impressive.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>&raquo; <em>But Trump&hellip; He is a sensation. In fact, it is a real change from the usual display. The Republicans, as well as the Democrats, are the representatives of the US ruling elites. It is a special part of society, being quite far from the ordinary Americans. This elite considers not America, but the world, not society, but unbelievable sums of money serves not people, an abstract utopia of the world government and global financial oligarchy. The American elite is not even American. Thus, there is Donald Trump, who is tough, rough, says what he thinks, rude, emotional and, apparently, candid. The fact that he is a billionaire doesn&rsquo;t matter. He is different. He is an extremely successful ordinary American. He is crude America, without gloss and the globalist elite. He is sometimes disgusting and violent, but he is what he is. It is true America<\/em>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>&raquo; <em>Most likely, Donald Trump is another designed product, a virtual figure. However, it is him who makes people feel fresh and hopeful. He is trustworthy: the black peacekeeper promised to change everything, but was unable to change anything, nothing at all, and Hilary Clinton, with a quickly aging poker face, doesn&rsquo;t promise to change anything, maybe Trump will be able to get America&rsquo;s natural borders back.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>&raquo; <em>Maybe, that redhead rude Yankee from the saloon will get back to the problems inside the country and will leave humanity alone, which is tired of American hegemony and its destructive policy of chaos, bloody rivers and color revolutions?<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>&raquo; <em>Trump is a leader. Most likely, he is fake, but even if he is not fake, he has no chance of winning, as the globalist elites and financial oligarchy control practically everything in the USA<\/em>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>&raquo; <em>But we want to put trust in Donald Trump<\/em>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>&raquo; <em>Vote for Trump, and see what will happen<\/em>. &raquo;<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>Mis en ligne le 3 mars 2016 \u00e0 06H12<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Douguine sur Trump Voici un avis sur Donald Trump qui nous para&icirc;t tr\u00e8s int\u00e9ressant, et que nous mettons en \u00e9vidence pour le singulariser dans la masse des jugements qui d\u00e9ferlent actuellement \u00e0 propos du candidat \u00e0 l&rsquo;investiture \u00e0 la candidature r\u00e9publicaine. Il s&rsquo;agit de celui d&rsquo;Alexandre Douguine, l&rsquo;intellectuel russe ultra-nationaliste et traditionnaliste. Il est absolument&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[2791,17369,6536,7258,2792,2655,2988,7347,3778,2730,2716,2639,12641],"class_list":["post-76448","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-breves-de-crise","tag-alexandre","tag-approbation","tag-caractere","tag-donald","tag-douguine","tag-modernite","tag-orthodoxe","tag-primaires","tag-religion","tag-russie","tag-tradition","tag-trump","tag-yankee"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76448","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=76448"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76448\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=76448"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=76448"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=76448"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}