{"id":76467,"date":"2016-03-13T12:49:50","date_gmt":"2016-03-13T12:49:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2016\/03\/13\/hillary-soros-le-ticket-du-diable\/"},"modified":"2016-03-13T12:49:50","modified_gmt":"2016-03-13T12:49:50","slug":"hillary-soros-le-ticket-du-diable","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2016\/03\/13\/hillary-soros-le-ticket-du-diable\/","title":{"rendered":"Hillary-Soros, le ticket<\/em> du Diable"},"content":{"rendered":"

Hillary-Soros, le ticket<\/em> du Diable<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n

Grande fut notre erreur de croire que Soros n’\u00e9tait pas<\/a> dans le \u00ab\u00a0complot de Sea Island\u00a0\u00bb, dont Patrick Buchanan<\/a> nous donne une bonne description. (Mais acceptable sinon confirm\u00e9e, notre hypoth\u00e8se qu’il aurait dû \u00eatre l\u00e0, Soros…) : « …Breitbart.com<\/em> se fait donc un plaisir, le 9 mars<\/a>, de relayer l’heureuse nouvelle. Il rappelle l’essentiel de la liste des invit\u00e9s. Nous y cherchons en vain le nom de Soros<\/strong>, qui semble n’avoir pas \u00e9t\u00e9 invit\u00e9 ; voil\u00e0 par contre une erreur strat\u00e9gique majeure<\/em>. » La v\u00e9rit\u00e9 \u00e9tait qu’il \u00e9tait bien pr\u00e9sent, sous la forme d’une ombre inspiratrice, cet \u00e9trange personnage dont le trait essentiel est \u00e9videmment satanique et semble inspirer tous ses autres caract\u00e8res bien connus de sp\u00e9culateurs et de manipulateur id\u00e9ologique.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\n

Certes, Clinton-Soros, – puisque la candidate Hillary Clinton est \u00e9videmment pr\u00e9sente dans cette aventure, – pouvez-vous r\u00eaver meilleur \u00ab\u00a0ticket<\/em>\u00a0\u00bb satanique, accessoirement pour gagner l’\u00e9lection mais essentiellement pour d\u00e9truire tous ceux qui se mettent en travers de la route de la candidate Clinton<\/strong>, charg\u00e9e de corruption sans nombre, coutur\u00e9e de scandales et de menaces d’inculpation, comme caract\u00e8re arch\u00e9typique, elle, d’une employ\u00e9e-Syst\u00e8me poussant \u00e0 son terme catastrophique l’arrogance, la v\u00e9nalit\u00e9, l’hallucination de l’hybris<\/em> affectiviste<\/a>. Certes, pourquoi pas Soros comme candidat vice-pr\u00e9sident, en traficotant un peu son acte de naissance en b\u00e9b\u00e9 se d\u00e9couvrant miraculeusement de nationalit\u00e9 am\u00e9ricaniste peu apr\u00e8s sa naissance en Hongrie ? Enfin, si nous vaticinons de la sortir, c’est parce qu’il y a une th\u00e8se, assez bien document\u00e9e, selon laquelle les troubles foment\u00e9s (d’abord \u00e0 Chicago le 11 mars, mais aussi \u00e0 Dayton et \u00e0 Cleveland le lendemain, en attendant la suite) pour tenter de d\u00e9truire l’action publique et populiste du candidat Trump sembleraient bien \u00eatre de manufacture Hillary-Soros, alors que la responsabilit\u00e9 initiale semblait \u00eatre celle de Bernie Sanders puisque les manifestants anti-Trump se r\u00e9clamaient de lui. <\/strong>L\u00e0 est le nœud de l’op\u00e9ration…<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

ZeroHedge.com<\/a><\/em> prend \u00e0 son compte le 12 mars les observations que diffuse Infowars.com<\/a><\/em> le m\u00eame jour, \u00e0 partir de quelques remarques mena\u00e7antes pour la suite des \u00e9v\u00e8nements de Ilya Sheyman, directeur ex\u00e9cutif de MoveOn.org Political Action<\/em>, organisation notamment financ\u00e9e par George Soros et dont l’action politique (est-ce le mot ?) est tr\u00e8s largement orient\u00e9e par le m\u00eame Soros.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

« [Sheyman] promised similar violence and disruption will occur at future Trump political events leading up to the election.\u00a0\u00bbMr. Trump and the Republican leaders who support him and his hate-filled rhetoric should be on notice<\/strong> after tonight’s events,\u00a0\u00bb on the George Soros funded MoveOn web page. \u00ab\u00a0To all of those who took to the streets of Chicago, we say thank you for standing up and saying enough is enough. To Donald Trump, and the GOP, we say, welcome to the general election<\/strong>.\u00a0\u00bb<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

» The violent demonstration in Chicago on Friday may represent a precursor to the sort of activity the organization will engage in as it tries to \u00ab\u00a0shut down\u00a0\u00bb its political enemies and elect either Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders. On Friday night many of the protesters shouted \u00ab\u00a0Bernie!\u00a0\u00bb and held placards announcing their support for the socialist Democrat.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

» The group acts as a front for wealthy Democrats<\/strong>. It was founded with the help of the financier George Soros who donated $1.46 million to get the organization rolling<\/strong>. Linda Pritzker of the Hyatt hotel family gave the group a $4 million donation.<\/em> »<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Infowars.com<\/em> a ensuite \u00e9volu\u00e9 plus pr\u00e9cis\u00e9ment dans son interpr\u00e9tation lors d’une \u00e9mission t\u00e9l\u00e9vis\u00e9e de son directeur, Alex Jones, qui recevait Roger Stone, un des hommes de main et enqu\u00eateurs les plus exp\u00e9riment\u00e9s du parti r\u00e9publicain. L’int\u00e9r\u00eat de l’intervention de Stone est donc qu’il donne une interpr\u00e9tation lagement substantiv\u00e9e et document\u00e9e impliquant que les attaquants anti-Trump de Chicago n’\u00e9taient pas inspir\u00e9s ni dirig\u00e9s par Sanders, mais bien, indirectement par Clinton associ\u00e9e \u00e0 Soros<\/strong>. Cette version a \u00e9t\u00e9 enti\u00e8rement reprise \u00e0 son compte par l’historien Eric Zuesse<\/a>, du Washington’s blog<\/em>, le m\u00eame 12 mars. L\u00e0 aussi, comme dans le cas de Jones qui \u00e9tait d’abord partisan de la th\u00e8se de la responsabilit\u00e9 de Sanders, l’acceptation des appr\u00e9ciations de Stone sont significatives par leur absence de parti-pris de proximit\u00e9 id\u00e9ologique : Zuesse commence par dire qu’il n’est pas du parti id\u00e9ologique de Stone, qu’il n’aime pas l’homme, qu’il n’aime pas du tout ses m\u00e9thodes, mais qu’il lui reconnaît des capacit\u00e9s d’enqu\u00eateurs hors-pair. (« In other words: though I don’t like the man, and I disagree with his politics, I respect his news-reporting<\/em>. »)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Zuesse, qui reprend la r\u00e9f\u00e9rence du DVD de l’\u00e9mission de Jones<\/a>, en donne une rapide transcription, ce qui nous permet de mieux comprendre le d\u00e9tail de la th\u00e8se. Il s’agirait, selon Stone, d’une op\u00e9ration mont\u00e9e par le couple Clinton-Soros en la faisant passer pour une op\u00e9ration anti-Trump de Sanders de fa\u00e7on \u00e0 couper compl\u00e8tement les \u00e9lecteurs de Sanders de Trump, pour les d\u00e9courager de voter pour lui lors de l’\u00e9lection g\u00e9n\u00e9rale<\/strong>. (Les positions de Trump sur le libre-\u00e9change [les trait\u00e9s TPP et TPIP] se sont r\u00e9v\u00e9l\u00e9es tr\u00e8s proches de celles de Sanders, notamment lors de la campagne dans le Michigan, et font craindre au camp Clinton de plus en plus pr\u00e9cis\u00e9ment, une d\u00e9sertion massive des \u00e9lecteurs de Sanders du camp d\u00e9mocrate vers Trump lors de l’\u00e9lection g\u00e9n\u00e9rale<\/strong>, si elle oppose comme c’est probable pour l’instant, Clinton \u00e0 Trump.) Voici les notes prises par Zuesse, transcrivant l’interview de Stone<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Stone <\/em><\/strong>: « I think everybody in the country has now heard about these violent protests <\/em>[at Trump rallies<\/em>] which are being blamed on supporters of Bernie Sanders. … This is a false-flag. These demonstrators are flying under a false banner. They are not Sanders supporters by-and-large. This is an operation directed by supporters of Hillary Clinton, paid for by George Soros and Move-On, by David Brock at Media Matters for America, also funded by Soros, and also by the reclusive billionaire Jonathan Lewis. Now, Lewis was identified by the Miami New Times as a ‘mystery man.’ He inherited roughly a billion dollars from his father Peter Lewis … <\/em>[founder of Progressive Insurance Company<\/em>]. Jonathan Lewis interestingly withdrew his support of the Democratic National Committee over the immigration bill that he thought was unfair to gays. In any event, this is a Hillary Clinton operation. The idea here, very clearly, is to divide the Sanders economic voters from Trump; in other words, those voters who lost their jobs because of NAFTA and all of the other globalist international trade-deals that have screwed this country, they now realize that these voters are potentially, when Sanders is out of the race, Trump votes, and this is an effort to make Trump toxic, to disqualify him, [as a] racist, bigot, the whole thing is essentially a hoax. It’s a gambit directed, by the way, by Brock. Brock was once a friend of mine and was a comrade in the fight for freedom; but he went over to the dark side, with the Clintons, for money: big, big, big, money; and this is unfortunately his little dirty trick, Unfortunately, they have leaks within their operation, my sources are of the very best. The entire collaboration in Chicago is a Hillary Clinton operation. And, frankly, I can’t see Bernie Sanders having anything to do with it. I don’t agree with Bernie, but I respect him, and this is not his handiwork or the handiwork of his campaign. »<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Jones<\/em><\/strong> here goes on to explain why he respects the investigative reports from Stone, then says : <\/em>« When I saw all these Bernie shirts and Bernie people saying ‘We attack!’ — you know, people shooting guns in the air saying ‘We support Bernie!’ that is so clearly a way to attack him, make him look like a radical revolutionary, and to make Hillary look good, and also make Trump look like a racist when the media plays this up. You’re absolutely right. … To be clear: you have sources inside saying this is a Soros\/Brock Media Matters, which they admit is run by the White House, they have weekly meetings, Obama’s former transition chief. … We’ve seen the build-up toward race-war this summer, this fall, to try to cloud the entire election; is that what you’re getting at; is this the opening salvo …<\/em> »<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Stone<\/em><\/strong> : « I think Hillary understands that Trump would lose the votes of certain establishment Republicans if he is the nominee. On the other hand, it doesn’t matter, because of his crossover outreach. Right now in Ohio, Democrats and independents in the Mahoning Valley, these people have lost their jobs because of these great globalist trade deals, are lining up to vote for Donald Trump in the Republican primary, which is legal in Ohio with some paperwork. And we saw this same crossover in Michigan. So it occurred to the Clinton people that Bernie’s economic voters — not his hard-left voters, she’s not going to get them, they’re not going for Hillary, blue-collar folks who have just figured out that they have been left out of the new-world-order economy, are a ripe target for Trump; he’s already getting that, she is petrified of it; so, this little maneuver, this David Brock dirty trick, solves two problems at once: it helps knock down Bernie, because after all these people are involved in violence; and it also disqualifies Trump as a future vote, by portraying him as a racist or a bigot. The whole thing is a kabuki dance<\/strong>. And I think it’s very important that Trump understand that it’s not the Sanders campaign that’s disrupting his rallies; this is a Hillary Clinton operation.<\/em> »<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Jones<\/strong> asks for more details… Stone<\/strong> continues :<\/em> « Hillary Clinton empowered a certain member of Congress to approach the billionaire John Lewis to pay for a portion of this overall program. This isn’t just Chicago. You’re now going to see these phony demonstrators, these ringers, showing up at other Trump events. … That’s as much as I’m prepared to say…\u00a0\u00bb <\/em>»<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\n

D’où l’on en d\u00e9duira que les adversaires de Trump, dans cette occurrence et dans cette orientation, ne se dissimulent plus mais qu’il importe d’abord de bien identifier et comprendre leurs positions, et sp\u00e9culer sur leurs buts. Qu’il s’agisse de MovOn.org<\/em> ou de MediaMatters.org<\/em>, il s’agit d’organisation \u00ab\u00a0frontistes\u00a0\u00bb de Soros, comme Soros en a le secret de l’organisation. Le fait est que ces organisations dissimulent \u00e0 peine leurs projets d’une campagne d’attaques d’intimidation pouvant aussi bien \u00eatre qualifi\u00e9e de \u00ab\u00a0terrorisme\u00a0\u00bb \u00e0 peine soft<\/em>. Une telle impudence et de telles actions, au point où en est la popularit\u00e9 de Trump, rendent difficile de penser que ces instigateurs esp\u00e8rent stopper brutalement sa course dans les primaires ; on peut m\u00eame envisager l’hypoth\u00e8se contraire, que ses attaques pourraient renforcent la popularit\u00e9 de Trump (apr\u00e8s la r\u00e9union annul\u00e9e de Chicago suite \u00e0 l’attaque, Trump a rassembl\u00e9 des foules consid\u00e9rables dans l’Ohio (20.000 personnes \u00e0 Dayton, 25.000 \u00e0 Cleveland) tout en lui donnant une couverture m\u00e9diatique nationale exceptionnelle. D’ailleurs ils (ces m\u00eames adversaires) semblent tenir pour acquis que Trump sera dans l’\u00e9lection finale et ne s’en cachent pas, presque avec satisfaction, comme il est dit par Sheyman, sur MovOn.org <\/em>: « A l’intention de Donald Trump, et du GOP, nous disons bienvenus dans l’\u00e9lection g\u00e9n\u00e9rale<\/em> » (c’est-\u00e0-dire dans la phase finale de l’\u00e9lection pr\u00e9sidentielle). Cela ressemble \u00e0 une v\u00e9ritable d\u00e9claration de guerre bien plus qu’un d\u00e9fi pour un affrontement \u00e9lectoral.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Alors, on peut se poser la question de savoir si le v\u00e9ritable but, au moins dans le chef de Soros, n’est pas une v\u00e9ritable guerre civile encore plus , et au-del\u00e0 certes, d’une comp\u00e9tition \u00e9lectorale<\/strong>. (Il est assur\u00e9 que la camp-Trump ne va pas rester longtemps sans prendre des mesures, que Trump le veuille ou non ; d\u00e9j\u00e0, des propositions de constituer des milices de protection<\/a> des rassemblements pro-Trump circulent sur l’internet.) Soros, qui est de tous les coups de la subversion-Syst\u00e8me, a d\u00e9j\u00e0 montr\u00e9 qu’il \u00e9tait preneur d’un durcissement de la formule initiale (en passant des \u00ab\u00a0r\u00e9volutions de couleur\u00a0\u00bb assez soft<\/em> au \u00ab\u00a0coup\u00a0\u00bb beaucoup plus dur, type-Maidan) ; pourquoi ne le serait-il pas d’un durcissement de la formule interm\u00e9diaire utilis\u00e9e \u00e0 Kiev ? Dans quel but, tout cela ? D\u00e8s lors que Soros est impliqu\u00e9, beaucoup de choses sont possibles, y compris la simple volont\u00e9 nihiliste-satanique de destruction<\/strong>… Pour qu’enfin l’on commence \u00e0 mesurer ce qu’implique cette Grande crise G\u00e9n\u00e9rale d’Effondrement du Syst\u00e8me …<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Mis en ligne le 13 mars 2016 \u00e0 12H49<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Hillary-Soros, le ticket du Diable Grande fut notre erreur de croire que Soros n’\u00e9tait pas dans le \u00ab\u00a0complot de Sea Island\u00a0\u00bb, dont Patrick Buchanan nous donne une bonne description. (Mais acceptable sinon confirm\u00e9e, notre hypoth\u00e8se qu’il aurait dû \u00eatre l\u00e0, Soros…) : « …Breitbart.com se fait donc un plaisir, le 9 mars, de relayer l’heureuse… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[10715,4952,934,7258,9465,3035,3278,2945,8327,4163,2639,12643],"class_list":["post-76467","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-bernie","tag-chicago","tag-clinton","tag-donald","tag-eric","tag-george","tag-hillary","tag-maidan","tag-sanders","tag-soros","tag-trump","tag-zuesse"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76467","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=76467"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76467\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=76467"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=76467"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=76467"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}