{"id":76512,"date":"2016-04-09T07:05:06","date_gmt":"2016-04-09T07:05:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2016\/04\/09\/torpille-au-but-de-bill-contre-hillary-soros\/"},"modified":"2016-04-09T07:05:06","modified_gmt":"2016-04-09T07:05:06","slug":"torpille-au-but-de-bill-contre-hillary-soros","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2016\/04\/09\/torpille-au-but-de-bill-contre-hillary-soros\/","title":{"rendered":"Torpille au but de Bill contre Hillary-Soros&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><h2 class=\"titleset_b.deepblue\" style=\"color:#0f3955; font-size:1.65em; font-variant:small-caps\">Torpille au but de Bill contre Hillary-Soros&#8230;<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>On peut croire, parce qu&rsquo;on est de bonne composition, que tout cela est involontaire, disons \u00ab\u00a0dans le feu de l&rsquo;action\u00a0\u00bb (du\/des discours). Il n&#8217;emp\u00eache qu&rsquo;on peut conjecturer que cela doit voler dur et bas, en ce moment, entre Bill et Hillary. Deux interventions de Bill Clinton, soutien fid\u00e8le de sa femme dans les primaires, donnent des effets \u00e9tonnamment contre-productifs&#8230; <strong>Certains, f\u00e9rus de psychanalyse, y verront quelques pulsions cach\u00e9es, dans un couple pr\u00e9sidentiel o&ugrave; la <em>First Lady<\/em> a souvent port\u00e9 la culotte, notamment durant les escapades sans nombre de Bill<\/strong>, et que le susdit Bill aurait parfois des attitudes inconscientes de soutenir sa femme \u00e0 la fa\u00e7on de la corde qui soutient le(la) pendu(e), &ndash; vengeance cach\u00e9e, jalousie, orgueil de type-macho, innocence av\u00e9r\u00e9e, &ndash; <em>who knows<\/em> ?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>Il y a d&rsquo;abord eu une remarque de Bill sur l'\u00a0\u00bb\u00e9tat terrible\u00a0\u00bb (<em>awful<\/em>) dans lequel se trouve le pays apr\u00e8s huit ans de pr\u00e9sidence-BHO, ce qui ne va pas d\u00e9tendre les relations entre Obama et Hillary alors qu&rsquo;Hillary a besoin du soutien du pr\u00e9sident (couleur de peau, <em>emailgate<\/em> avec inculpation ou pas, etc.). (William Pruden, dans <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtontimes.com\/news\/2016\/apr\/7\/wesley-pruden-bill-clinton-spells-trouble-for-hill\/\">son \u00e9dito<\/a> du Washington <em>Times<\/em> du 7 avril reprend cet \u00e9pisode, ainsi que celui dont nous allons parler, sous le titre &laquo; <em>Here comes trouble, and it looks like Bubba<\/em> &raquo; [<em><a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Bubba\">Bubba<\/a><\/em>, surnom affectionn\u00e9 par les Africains-Am\u00e9ricains pour d\u00e9signer le fr\u00e8re ain\u00e9 ou le chef de famille, et qui a \u00e9t\u00e9 parfois donn\u00e9 \u00e0 Bill].)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><p>&#8230; Il y a surtout eu l&rsquo;incident de jeudi, lors d&rsquo;un discours public o&ugrave; Bill a \u00e9t\u00e9 apostroph\u00e9 par un groupe de <em>Black Lives Matter<\/em> (disons BLM), \u00e0 propos d&rsquo;une remarque de la <em>First Lady<\/em> Hillary en 1996, sur les \u00ab\u00a0superpr\u00e9dateurs\u00a0\u00bb des gangs noirs de Chicago. Hillary s&rsquo;en \u00e9tait d\u00e9j\u00e0 expliqu\u00e9e en pr\u00e9cisant qu&rsquo;elle n&rsquo;aurait pas d&ucirc; dire ces mots, tandis que Bill, au contraire, les a justifi\u00e9s avec une rare \u00e9nergie. <strong>Du coup \u00e9clatent les accusations de racisme sur <em>Tweeter<\/em>, et qui dit Bill-raciste en vient tr\u00e8s vite \u00e0 Hillary-raciste, alors qu&rsquo;Hillary mise \u00e0 fond sur l&rsquo;\u00e9lectorat Africain-Am\u00e9ricain<\/strong>. D&rsquo;autant plus dur tout \u00e7a, que BLM est soutenu par Soros, et m\u00eame par le gang <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article\/hillary-soros-le-ticket-du-diable\">Hillary-Soros<\/a>, pour aller saboter la campagne de Trump ; <strong>comme d&rsquo;hab&rsquo; quand on est am\u00e9ricaniste et qu&rsquo;on fabrique un Frankenstein (voir <em>Daesh<\/em>), BLM devient terriblement activiste et n&rsquo;en fait qu&rsquo;\u00e0 sa t\u00eate dans sa campagne anti-Trump et antiraciste qui tourne \u00e0 ce que certains jugent comme du racisme anti-blanc (\u00e7a existe, \u00e7a ?)<\/strong>. Et comme Bill et Hillary sont, comment dire, &ndash; blancs, c&rsquo;est \u00e7a, dans tous les cas jusqu&rsquo;\u00e0 nouvel ordre des autorit\u00e9s morales&#8230; Voici, de <em><a href=\"http:\/\/sputniknews.com\/politics\/20160408\/1037668585\/bill-hillary-blm-superpredator-incarceration.html#ixzz45Ia5uU9S\">Sputnik.News du 8 avril<\/a><\/em>, le r\u00e9cit de l&rsquo;incident Bill <em>versus<\/em> BLM.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><p>&laquo; <em>On Thursday, off-script comments directed at Black Lives Matter protesters by would-be First Husband Bill Clinton were seen as possibly drying up the black vote that the Hillary Clinton campaign relies upon. The former US President broke from his written remarks to criticize Black Lives Matter protesters who had interrupted him during his speech in Philadelphia. \u00ab\u00a0I don&rsquo;t know how you would characterize the gang leaders who got 13-year-old kids hopped up on crack and sent them out into the streets to murder other African-American children, maybe you thought they were good citizens, but she didn&rsquo;t,\u00a0\u00bb the former president declared, defending his wife&rsquo;s &lsquo;superpredator&rsquo; comments in 1996. \u00ab\u00a0You are defending the people who killed the lives you say matter.\u00a0\u00bb<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>&raquo; <em>The context of Ms. Clinton&rsquo;s 1996 comment has been contested, but the former Secretary of State herself stated, \u00ab\u00a0Looking back, I shouldn&rsquo;t have used those words and I wouldn&rsquo;t use them today.\u00a0\u00bb The &lsquo;superpredator&rsquo; theory is that some children, specifically black children, are born sociopaths and are beyond repair. This theory, since debunked, has been used to justify both white supremacist activities and mass incarceration. The comments by then-First Lady Clinton were made as a justification for her husband&rsquo;s crime bills that independent researchers blame for a surge in the disproportionate incarceration of black men in America, primarily for non-violent drug offenses<\/em>. [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>&raquo; <strong><em>Twitter Explodes Over Bill Clinton&rsquo;s Remarks. <\/em><\/strong>&raquo;<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>Mis en ligne le 9 avril 2016 \u00e0 06H59<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Torpille au but de Bill contre Hillary-Soros&#8230; On peut croire, parce qu&rsquo;on est de bonne composition, que tout cela est involontaire, disons \u00ab\u00a0dans le feu de l&rsquo;action\u00a0\u00bb (du\/des discours). Il n&#8217;emp\u00eache qu&rsquo;on peut conjecturer que cela doit voler dur et bas, en ce moment, entre Bill et Hillary. Deux interventions de Bill Clinton, soutien fid\u00e8le&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[6041,3126,17431,6120,934,3278,17429,17391,6208,7347,3424,17430],"class_list":["post-76512","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-breves-de-crise","tag-bill","tag-black","tag-blm","tag-campagne","tag-clinton","tag-hillary","tag-lives","tag-matter","tag-obama","tag-primaires","tag-racisme","tag-superpredateurs"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76512","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=76512"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76512\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=76512"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=76512"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=76512"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}