{"id":76538,"date":"2016-04-24T11:24:17","date_gmt":"2016-04-24T11:24:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2016\/04\/24\/trump-remet-les-pendules-a-lheure\/"},"modified":"2016-04-24T11:24:17","modified_gmt":"2016-04-24T11:24:17","slug":"trump-remet-les-pendules-a-lheure","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2016\/04\/24\/trump-remet-les-pendules-a-lheure\/","title":{"rendered":"Trump remet les pendules \u00e0 l&rsquo;heure"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><h2 class=\"titleset_b.deepblue\" style=\"color:#0f3955; font-size:1.65em; font-variant:small-caps\">Trump remet les pendules \u00e0 l&rsquo;heure<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>Depuis sa victoire \u00e9crasante \u00e0 New York, Trump appara&icirc;t comme le gagnant quasi-certain des primaires r\u00e9publicaines et il est apparu \u00e0 divers commentateteurs qu&rsquo;on distinguait une certaine mod\u00e9ration de son discours dans le but de se concilier la direction du parti r\u00e9publicain pour faciliter la proc\u00e9dure de sa d\u00e9signation et ne pas se couper des structures du parti. Dans cette logique, le soup\u00e7on est n\u00e9 que le candidat parti sur une base antiSyst\u00e8me commen\u00e7ait \u00e0 entrer dans le jeu du Syst\u00e8me pour parvenir \u00e0 ses fins, avec l&rsquo;interrogation de savoir si ce qui se pr\u00e9sentait comme une tactique <strong>ne risquerait pas devenir une strat\u00e9gie faisant basculer Trump dans le Syst\u00e8me<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><p>Cette perception, fond\u00e9e ou pas, constituerait dans tous les cas un risque consid\u00e9rable pour Trump, dont l&rsquo;essentiel du soutien vient de sa position antiSyst\u00e8me. Trump a voulu remettre \u00e0 son vrai niveau sa candidature, <strong>en r\u00e9affirmant son caract\u00e8re antiSyst\u00e8me, ou anti-<em>establishment<\/em> et violemment oppos\u00e9 aux \u00ab\u00a0int\u00e9r\u00eats priv\u00e9s\u00a0\u00bb et autres lobbies, dans plusieurs vid\u00e9os<\/strong>. Par ailleurs, dans un discours, il a dit esp\u00e9rer qu&rsquo;il aurait Clinton comme adversaire, parce qu&rsquo;il pourrait ainsi d\u00e9ployer toute sa dialectique et sa strat\u00e9gie antiSyst\u00e8me contre une candidate qui est l&rsquo;arch\u00e9type de la candidate-Syst\u00e8me.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><p>Trump doit man&oelig;uvrer d\u00e9licatement dans cette phase : ne pas trop se couper de la direction du parti pour obtenir sa d\u00e9signation, conserver \u00e0 tout prix son \u00e9lectorat antiSyst\u00e8me. S&rsquo;il est d\u00e9sign\u00e9 et si Clinton est d\u00e9sign\u00e9e, c&rsquo;est effectivement durant la comp\u00e9tition finale qu&rsquo;on verra la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 et la vigueur de son engagement antiSyst\u00e8me ; par ailleurs, il semble bien que cela soit pour lui la seule possibilit\u00e9 qu&rsquo;il ait de battre Clinton. Par cons\u00e9quent, s&rsquo;il y a une \u00ab\u00a0finale\u00a0\u00bb Trump-Clinton, elle devrait \u00eatre particuli\u00e8rement f\u00e9roce, <strong>sans aucun doute l&rsquo;affrontement le plus cruel et le plus violent de toute l&rsquo;histoire \u00e9lectorale des USA<\/strong>. (Ci-apr\u00e8s, quelques notes extraites des vid\u00e9os de Trump par le Washington, le <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/trump-establishment-special-interests-are-killing-the-country\/article\/2589383\">23 avril<\/a>.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>&laquo; <em>Donald Trump said Saturday that political insiders are \u00ab\u00a0killing the country\u00a0\u00bb and urged backers to help him defeat them. The Establishment and special interests are absolutely killing our country,\u00a0\u00bb Trump tweeted. \u00ab\u00a0Stop them now.\u00a0\u00bb<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>&raquo; <em>The mogul released a new video laying out his beef with the so-called Establishment. \u00ab\u00a0The Establishment, lobbyists, and special interests are absolutely killing our country,\u00a0\u00bb Trump says in the video, \u00ab\u00a0I will work for you.\u00a0\u00bb \u00ab\u00a0Our politicians are never going to do what&rsquo;s right for you &mdash; the people of our country\u00a0\u00bb Trump continues. \u00ab\u00a0They are only going to do what&rsquo;s right for them, meaning contributions to run for office now, and in the future.\u00a0\u00bb<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>&raquo; <em>Trump, though, conceded some pragmatism, conceivably trying to head off criticism that he&rsquo;s selling out. \u00ab\u00a0We&rsquo;ll work with the Establishment, but they&rsquo;re no longer going to control what&rsquo;s happening,\u00a0\u00bb Trump remarks. \u00ab\u00a0We&rsquo;re going to control it. And it&rsquo;s going to be good for you. And it&rsquo;s going to be my great honor.\u00a0\u00bb<\/em> &raquo;<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>Mis en ligne le 24 avril 2016 \u00e0 11H21<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Trump remet les pendules \u00e0 l&rsquo;heure Depuis sa victoire \u00e9crasante \u00e0 New York, Trump appara&icirc;t comme le gagnant quasi-certain des primaires r\u00e9publicaines et il est apparu \u00e0 divers commentateteurs qu&rsquo;on distinguait une certaine mod\u00e9ration de son discours dans le but de se concilier la direction du parti r\u00e9publicain pour faciliter la proc\u00e9dure de sa d\u00e9signation&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[4646,6120,934,4118,2639],"class_list":["post-76538","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-breves-de-crise","tag-antisysteme","tag-campagne","tag-clinton","tag-establishment","tag-trump"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76538","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=76538"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76538\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=76538"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=76538"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=76538"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}