{"id":76539,"date":"2016-04-24T12:43:46","date_gmt":"2016-04-24T12:43:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2016\/04\/24\/conseil-au-fbi-lart-de-la-fuite-mode-emailgate\/"},"modified":"2016-04-24T12:43:46","modified_gmt":"2016-04-24T12:43:46","slug":"conseil-au-fbi-lart-de-la-fuite-mode-emailgate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2016\/04\/24\/conseil-au-fbi-lart-de-la-fuite-mode-emailgate\/","title":{"rendered":"Conseil au FBI\u00a0: l&rsquo;\u201cart de la fuite\u201d, mode-<em>emailgate<\/em>"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><h2 class=\"titleset_b.deepblue\" style=\"color:#0f3955; font-size:1.65em; font-variant:small-caps\">Conseil au FBI : l'\u00a0\u00bbart de la fuite\u00a0\u00bb, mode-<em>emailgate<\/em><\/h2>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>Le caract\u00e8re inhabituel de ces \u00e9lections pr\u00e9sidentielles US s&rsquo;est manifest\u00e9 une fois de plus par une d\u00e9claration du s\u00e9nateur r\u00e9publicain Grassley, qui est pr\u00e9sident de la commission judiciaire du S\u00e9nat. Grassley a quasiment conseill\u00e9, sugg\u00e9r\u00e9 ou laiss\u00e9 entendre \u00e0 l&rsquo;intention du FBI que la<strong> meilleure fa\u00e7on de proc\u00e9der dans le cas d&rsquo;Hillary Clinton et de son scandale <em>emailgate<\/em> serait de pratiquer des \u00ab\u00a0fuites\u00a0\u00bb de documents vers la presse<\/strong>. La d\u00e9claration a \u00e9t\u00e9 assortie de diverses r\u00e9serves car il ne s&rsquo;agit de rien moins que d&rsquo;une incitation \u00e0 commettre un acte d\u00e9lictueux aux yeux des r\u00e8glements \u00e9tiques et de discipline des organes de s\u00e9curit\u00e9.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>Les propos de Grassley, faits au cours d&rsquo;une innocente r\u00e9union du Rotary Club \u00e0 des Moines, dans l&rsquo;Idaho, ont constitu\u00e9 en une suite assez longue, lors d&rsquo;une r\u00e9ponse \u00e0 une question assez anodine, de questions-r\u00e9ponses que le s\u00e9nateur s&rsquo;adressait \u00e0 lui-m\u00eame, notamment concernant les interf\u00e9rences et le blocage probables du minist\u00e8re de la Justice face aux recommandations du FBI. <strong>En tant que pr\u00e9sident de la commission judiciaire du S\u00e9nat, Grassley est bien plac\u00e9 pour savoir de quoi l&rsquo;on parle lorsqu&rsquo;on \u00e9voque l&rsquo;hypoth\u00e8se d&rsquo;une obstruction patente.<\/strong> Il a ensuite r\u00e9pondu \u00e0 l&rsquo;une ou l&rsquo;autre question de la presse et de la radio locale, rendant ainsi son intervention quasi-officielle. Il a bien pr\u00e9cis\u00e9 qu&rsquo;il n&rsquo;encourageait pas de telles pratiques, &ndash; bien s&ucirc;r, puisqu&rsquo;elles sont ill\u00e9gales, &ndash; mais qu&rsquo;il avait entendu dire que cela serait bien possible&#8230; Voici ce que nous en dit <em>ZeroHedge.com<\/em> (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.zerohedge.com\/news\/2016-04-23\/fbi-may-leak-clinton-email-probe-if-doj-blocking-continues-grassley-warns\">le 23 avril<\/a>) avec suffisamment d&rsquo;ironie pour que nous nous retrouvions parfaitement.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><p>&laquo; <em>On Friday, US Senator Chuck Grassley who chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee, and who has pushed for additional scrutiny of Clinton&rsquo;s email use during her tenure as secretary of state, dropped a dramatic &quot;hint&quot; during a breakfast meeting with the Des Moines A.M. Rotary club when he suggested <strong>that the FBI \u00ab\u00a0might leak\u00a0\u00bb, hypothetically-speaking of course, reports of its investigation into presidential candidate Hillary Clinton&rsquo;s use of a private email server as secretary of state. <\/strong>In practically laying out the next steps in Hillarygate, Grassley said \u00ab\u00a0<strong>an anonymous and unauthorized release of FBI investigative materials could result if officials at the agency believed prosecution of Clinton was stymied for political reasons<\/strong>\u00a0\u00bb according to the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.desmoinesregister.com\/story\/news\/politics\/2016\/04\/22\/grassley-fbi-could-leak-clinton-email-investigation\/83385362\/\">Des Moines register<\/a>. \u00ab\u00a0Is there going to be political interference? If there&rsquo;s enough evidence to prosecute, will there be political interference?\u00a0\u00bb Grassley wondered aloud on Friday. \u00ab\u00a0<strong>And if there&rsquo;s political interference, then I assume that somebody in the FBI is going to leak these reports and it&rsquo;s either going to have an effect politically or it&rsquo;s going to lead to prosecution if there&rsquo;s enough evidence.<\/strong>\u00ab\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><p>&raquo; <em>The senior senator&rsquo;s musing came in response to a long answer to a very general question from one of the Rotarians about the status on inquiries into the email server and Clinton&rsquo;s handling of the 2012 terrorist attack on a diplomatic post in Benghazi, Libya. Which, of course, would be potentially devastating for Hillary as not only would her misdeed as chronicled by the Feds be fully in the open and ammo for any of her competitors in the presidential race, but would also confirm that the Department of Justice is anything but, and has led to such a dramatic perversion of the law as being forced to leak evidence of criminality in the public arena just so the population can be made aware of Hillary&rsquo;s actions.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>&raquo; <em>As for Grassley&rsquo;s unorthodox \u00ab\u00a0suggestion\u00a0\u00bb, when asked by Radio Iowa reporter O. Kay Henderson after the breakfast if he was suggesting the FBI <strong>should <\/strong>leak investigative findings, Grassley expounded on his comment. \u00ab\u00a0I wouldn&rsquo;t be encouraging it because if it&rsquo;s a violation of law, I can&rsquo;t be encouraging a violation of law,\u00a0\u00bb he said. \u00ab\u00a0This is kind of my own opinion, this is something I&rsquo;ve heard.\u00a0\u00bb<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>&raquo; <em>Yes, Chuck, we get it. And now we wonder how long before a treasure trove of \u00ab\u00a0leaked\u00a0\u00bb FBI documents exposing the full extent of Hillary&rsquo;s action is leaked, although we can&rsquo;t help but wonder that just like the Panama Papers dump, the media will be prepared and will promptly redirect the public&rsquo;s attention to Vladimir Putin once again as the guilty party behind it all.<\/em> &raquo;<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>Mis en ligne le 14avril 2016 \u00e0 12H46<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Conseil au FBI : l&rsquo;\u00a0\u00bbart de la fuite\u00a0\u00bb, mode-emailgate Le caract\u00e8re inhabituel de ces \u00e9lections pr\u00e9sidentielles US s&rsquo;est manifest\u00e9 une fois de plus par une d\u00e9claration du s\u00e9nateur r\u00e9publicain Grassley, qui est pr\u00e9sident de la commission judiciaire du S\u00e9nat. Grassley a quasiment conseill\u00e9, sugg\u00e9r\u00e9 ou laiss\u00e9 entendre \u00e0 l&rsquo;intention du FBI que la meilleure fa\u00e7on&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[934,2631,17320,2838,4311,17466,3278,6254,2622,17467,17468,9681],"class_list":["post-76539","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-breves-de-crise","tag-clinton","tag-de","tag-emailgate","tag-fbi","tag-fuite","tag-grassley","tag-hillary","tag-justice","tag-la","tag-ministere","tag-obstruction","tag-senateur"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76539","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=76539"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76539\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=76539"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=76539"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=76539"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}