D’une certaine fa\u00e7on, on parlerait d’une surprise, et ce serait alors une tr\u00e8s bonne surprise. Il semblait ces deux derni\u00e8res semaines devenir probable que l’adversaire de Clinton, apr\u00e8s ses r\u00e9centes d\u00e9faites (New York puis 4 autres primaires sur 5 la semaine derni\u00e8re), c\u00e9derait aux pressions de la direction du parti d\u00e9mocrate et abandonnerait la course \u00e0 la d\u00e9signation. Il n’en est rien et c’est un rude coup pour ce parti, qui comptait se pr\u00e9senter comme le parti unitaire, maître de lui et pouvant donner confiance aux \u00e9lecteurs. Sanders refuse cette issue et estime qu’Hillary Clinton n’aura pas la majorit\u00e9 requise, donc qu’on ira \u00e0 une \u00ab\u00a0convention de compromis\u00a0\u00bb (brockered convention<\/em>), qui signifie en fait une \u00ab\u00a0convention de contestation\u00a0\u00bb, sinon \u00ab\u00a0d’affrontement\u00a0\u00bb.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Sanders met en cause le syst\u00e8me des \u00ab\u00a0super-d\u00e9l\u00e9gu\u00e9s\u00a0\u00bb propre au parti d\u00e9mocrate, qui favorise outrageusement Clinton selon des processus complexes, insaisissables sinon sombres et glauques. Ces \u00ab\u00a0super-d\u00e9l\u00e9gu\u00e9s\u00a0\u00bb ne sont pas \u00e9lus mais d\u00e9sign\u00e9s, et Clinton en dispose, arbitrairement selon Sanders, de 520 contre 39 \u00e0 Sanders. Bref, Sanders est d\u00e9cid\u00e9 \u00e0 se battre jusqu’au bout, ce qui est une excellente nouvelle pour l’animation de la chose (l’\u00e9lection), l’entretien du chaos, l’incertitude politique, etc. Quelle que soit la d\u00e9signation, le parti d\u00e9mocrate risque de sortir de cette convention aussi divis\u00e9 que le parti r\u00e9publicain, ce qui conduirait le syst\u00e8me de l’am\u00e9ricanisme encore plus proche d’une compl\u00e8te d\u00e9sint\u00e9gration. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n « Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders said Sunday that he will continue his challenge to front-runner Hillary Clinton even at the party’s convention in July. \u00ab\u00a0The convention will be a contested contest,\u00a0\u00bb Sanders said at a Washington, D.C. press conference Sunday. Sanders’ pledge to push superdelegates behind Clinton to support him during the nominating contest raises the chance the Republicans’ Cleveland gathering will not be the only convention fight this summer<\/strong>.<\/em> […]<\/p>\n<\/p>\n » \u00ab\u00a0It is virtually impossible for Secretary Clinton to reach the majority of convention delegates by June 14 with pledged delegates alone,\u00a0\u00bb Sanders said, referring to the final day of primaries. \u00ab\u00a0She will need superdelegates to take her over the top at the convention.\u00a0\u00bb That’s where Sanders said his campaign will attempt to further complicate the front-runner’s effort. He hopes to steal superdelegates already committed to her, including some who backed her before Sanders announced his bid last April<\/em>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n » For Sanders the fight may be less about winning the election than earning support that he believes is rightfully his. He complained Sunday about primary rules, including a rule imposed by New York Democrats that barred independents from voting in the state’s crucial primary, won handily by Clinton. Clinton has won 55 percent of the pledged delegates and Sanders has secured 45 percent. The democratic socialist would need an additional 710 pledged delegates or 65 percent of the remaining delegates to lock down the nomination before Philadelphia, which is where superdelegates become very useful. But Clinton and Sanders have 520 and 39 superdelegates, respectively. Sanders blamed the party establishment for backing its \u00ab\u00a0anointed\u00a0\u00bb candidate as the reason he has only been dealt 7 percent of superdelegates. \u00ab\u00a0I would hope very much that the superdelegates from those states where we have won with big margins would respect the wishes of the people of those states and vote in line with how the people of that state voted,\u00a0\u00bb Sanders said<\/em>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n » He’s banking on what Democrats have chided Republicans about for months: a nasty fight on the convention floor to win on technicalities. His argument for superdelegates is simple. Polls of hypothetical general election match-ups show him defeating Republicans more easily than Clinton. \u00ab\u00a0The evidence is extremely clear that I would be the stronger candidate to defeat Trump or any other Republican. This isn’t subjective evidence of Bernie Sanders. This is what the polls say,\u00a0\u00bb Sanders said, pulling out Morning Consult poll figures from the podium.<\/em> »<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Mis en ligne le 2 mai 2016 \u00e0 11H52<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Sanders, ou Bernie-continuons-le-combat ! D’une certaine fa\u00e7on, on parlerait d’une surprise, et ce serait alors une tr\u00e8s bonne surprise. Il semblait ces deux derni\u00e8res semaines devenir probable que l’adversaire de Clinton, apr\u00e8s ses r\u00e9centes d\u00e9faites (New York puis 4 autres primaires sur 5 la semaine derni\u00e8re), c\u00e9derait aux pressions de la direction du parti d\u00e9mocrate… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[934,5592,7423,3009,8327,7546],"class_list":["post-76549","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-breves-de-crise","tag-clinton","tag-contestation","tag-convention","tag-democrates","tag-sanders","tag-super-delegues"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76549","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=76549"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76549\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=76549"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=76549"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=76549"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}