Brexit <\/em>et le TTIP sont-ils \u00e9troitement associ\u00e9s<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\nIl faut enfin noter que l’entretien est domin\u00e9 par le constat que l’intervention \u00e0 Londres du pr\u00e9sident des États-Unis a eu des effets d\u00e9favorables et que, d’ores et d\u00e9j\u00e0, les partisans du Brexit<\/em> m\u00e8nent de 2% sur leurs adversaires, et surtout que 80% de ces affirmations sont pr\u00e9sent\u00e9es par ceux qui en r\u00e9pondent comme fermes et sans possibilit\u00e9 qu’elles soient modifi\u00e9es selon les circonstances g\u00e9n\u00e9rales qu’on connaît. Ainsi la riposte antiSyst\u00e8me, ici sous la forme des pro-Brexit<\/em>, l\u00e0, et plus g\u00e9n\u00e9ralement, sous la forme de l’opposition grandissante et d\u00e9vastatrice au TTIP\/TAFTA, s’exprime d\u00e9sormais d’une fa\u00e7on aussi crue et d\u00e9cid\u00e9e que l’action des centres de puissance du syst\u00e8me et de la globalisation d\u00e9structurante et dissolvante<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\nQuestion :<\/em><\/strong> « Will the Leave campaign’s surge in the poll hold?<\/em> »<\/p>\n<\/p>\nComment : « <\/em><\/strong>\u00ab\u00a0There is always a health warning on opinion polls, they are only opinion polls,\u00a0\u00bb said Gordon. \u00ab\u00a0The real opinion poll will be the referendum on the 23rd of June.\u00a0\u00bb \u00ab\u00a0Current opinion polls coming out today are indicating that there has been a hardening of support for the leave campaign — the ICM opinion poll reported a 46% Leave support versus 44% for remaining in the EU<\/strong>, but they also discovered among their respondents a hardening of resolve of the leave supporters with 80% saying that they are absolutely certain<\/strong> to vote against remaining in the EU versus 75% prior to Obama’s visit,\u00a0\u00bb explained Gordon dissecting the promising polling results<\/em>. »<\/p>\n<\/p>\nQuestion :<\/em><\/strong> « What was the reception in the British press of Obama’s comments last week? <\/em>»<\/p>\n<\/p>\nComment : « <\/em><\/strong>\u00ab\u00a0The way in which Obama intervened in this particular debate was particularly noteworthy, arriving early morning on Air Force One, straight into a press conference with a scripted intervention around the European Union Referendum that had been scripted for him by Downing Street officials,\u00a0\u00bb remarked Gordon. \u00ab\u00a0Obama said in very un-American English that if British voters vote to leave the European Union then Britain will find itself at the back of the queue.\u00a0\u00bb<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n» The outgoing US President is well-known for writing his own speeches, and the Lexit activist argued that Obama’s choice of words aroused suspicion about who was really behind his statement, overshadowing the content of his remarks. \u00ab\u00a0That was the cat being let out of the bag because that remark wouldn’t have been scripted by a US press attache or script writer, it was written by the British foreign office for Obama – Obama would have said at the back of the line, not the back of the queue<\/strong><\/em>.<\/strong>\u00a0\u00bb »<\/p>\n<\/p>\nQuestion :<\/em><\/strong> « Why did President Obama attempt to intervene in the referendum vote?<\/em> »<\/p>\n<\/p>\nComment : « <\/em><\/strong>\u00ab\u00a0Obama is clearly the messenger boy of the American banks doing business in London<\/strong>,\u00a0\u00bb opined Gordon. \u00ab\u00a0Goldman Sachs is bankrolling the Remain campaign, the campaign to persuade British voters to remain in the European Union. They have given a £1 million ($1.45 million) to support this campaign over the next eight weeks<\/strong>.\u00a0\u00bb<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n» Gordon explains that American financial interests support the Remain campaign because, with the UK as part of the EU, American banks can use London to access the European single-market system. \u00ab\u00a0Britain’s departure from the European Union would be a loss of [US banks] investment on this low-regulation political economy that has been established since Margaret Thatcher liberalizing London with the big bang of 1986.\u00a0\u00bb Gordon elaborated that prior to Britain’s accession to the European Economic Community (the precursor to the EU) in 1973 and before rise of Thatcherism’s deregulatory mandate in 1986, London’s finance sector was a heavily regulated \u00ab\u00a0cut-by-custom\u00a0\u00bb environment that prevented highly-leveraged speculative investments and cross-border trading through derivatives. Since then, London’s finance circle has been overrun by tens of thousands of senior US banking employees. \u00ab\u00a0For these employees and the corporations they work for, Britain’s role and status within the European Union and the European single market is absolutely critical for their investment strategies. That is why Obama was in London<\/strong>,\u00a0\u00bb commented Gordon.<\/em> »<\/p>\n<\/p>\nQuestion :<\/em><\/strong> « How did President Obama’s comments linking EU membership to TTIP impact public opinion?<\/em> »<\/p>\n<\/p>\nComment : « <\/em><\/strong>\u00ab\u00a0What we had been saying all week and which a lot of people have been responding to is that if you are against TTIP and you are against Britain being part of a global free trade agreement that is going to tie our public services to the interests of global corporations then you should vote to get out of the European Union on the 23rd of June,\u00a0\u00bb said Gordon. \u00ab\u00a0Obama just confirmed that what we were saying is right, if you are against TTIP, if you are in favor of public services and in favor of popular democracy then you should vote to get out of the EU because Obama just told you that you won’t get TTIP if you leave the EU,\u00a0\u00bb remarked Gordon<\/em>. »<\/p>\n<\/p>\nQuestion :<\/em><\/strong> « What is the broader public opinion of the TTIP?<\/em> »<\/p>\n<\/p>\nComment : « <\/em><\/strong>\u00ab\u00a0It is controversial because the negotiations have taken place in complete secrecy with no legislative or public oversight of the negotiation terms,\u00a0\u00bb said Gordon, speaking of the unusual secrecy in which the trade pacts has been created and negotiated. The Lexit campaigner raised concerns that the TTIP may result in the end of the country’s popular single-payer health system. \u00ab\u00a0The National Health Service in Britain would be imperiled by the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership because one of the protocols within TTIP allows health sector corporations to sue governments that prevent them from getting into a market – there are already very large US health businesses eager to invade and get their hands on contracts in Britain.\u00a0\u00bb <\/em>»<\/p>\n<\/p>\nMis en ligne le 4 mai 2016 \u00e0 13H45<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Obama en solde, pour TTIP \u00e0 tout prix Apr\u00e8s son show d’autod\u00e9rision de vendredi soir, Obama apparaît \u00e9trangement, au travers des quelques nouvelles qui suivent, comme une cr\u00e9ature \u00ab\u00a0sous garantie\u00a0\u00bb, compl\u00e8tement \u00e0 vendre et en fait achet\u00e9e d’une fa\u00e7on extr\u00eamement grossi\u00e8re, quasiment sous contrat de grandes et respectables institutions comme Goldman-Sachs dont il parla avec… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[15360,12496,3858,9287,5147,6208,16276,15924,12709],"class_list":["post-76553","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-becker","tag-brexit","tag-corruption","tag-goldman-sachs","tag-gordon","tag-obama","tag-sputnik","tag-tafta","tag-ttip"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76553","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=76553"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76553\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=76553"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=76553"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=76553"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}