{"id":76555,"date":"2016-05-05T19:00:34","date_gmt":"2016-05-05T19:00:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2016\/05\/05\/oups-ron-paul-secretaire-detat\/"},"modified":"2016-05-05T19:00:34","modified_gmt":"2016-05-05T19:00:34","slug":"oups-ron-paul-secretaire-detat","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2016\/05\/05\/oups-ron-paul-secretaire-detat\/","title":{"rendered":"Oups&#8230; Ron Paul, secr\u00e9taire d&rsquo;\u00c9tat\u00a0?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><h2 class=\"titleset_b.deepblue\" style=\"color:#0f3955; font-size:1.65em; font-variant:small-caps\">Oups&#8230; Ron Paul, secr\u00e9taire d&rsquo;&Eacute;tat ?<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>C&rsquo;est une blague, ce n&rsquo;est pas une blague ; c&rsquo;est un ballon d&rsquo;essai, c&rsquo;est de la provoc&rsquo;, c&rsquo;est n&rsquo;importe quoi, etc., &ndash; choisissez&#8230; C&rsquo;est dans tous les cas, \u00e0 notre sens, un premier signe de ce qui nous attend avec <em>The Donald<\/em>, d\u00e9sormais candidat quasi-d\u00e9sign\u00e9 du parti r\u00e9publicain : des rumeurs folles, des annonces inattendues, bref une flot de communication caract\u00e9ris\u00e9 par l&rsquo;inattendu, autant venant de lui que de ses adversaires et de ses partisans. Les Chinois n&rsquo;aiment pas Trump, principalement parce qu&rsquo;il est \u00ab\u00a0impr\u00e9visible\u00a0\u00bb.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>Donc, certains prennent au s\u00e9rieux le tweet de la journaliste du Washington <em>Post<\/em> Jennifer Rubin, le 4 mai sur <em><a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/thingstoworryabout?src=hash&#038;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#thingstoworryabout<\/a><\/em>, simplement avec ces mots : &laquo; <em>Ron Paul, Secretary of State<\/em> &raquo;, signifiant que le choix que Trump ferait pour cette fonction vitale pour la politique \u00e9trang\u00e8re serait celui du vieux libertarien, antiguerre , \u00e0 la limite d&rsquo;\u00eatre un rebelle antiSyst\u00e8me. Rubin est compl\u00e8tement dans la ligne du Post, c&rsquo;est-\u00e0-dire de tendance <em>neocon<\/em>, et effectivement elle agite ici une de ces possibilit\u00e9s qui seraient catastrophique pour son camp.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><p>Inutile d&rsquo;\u00e9piloguer sur la v\u00e9racit\u00e9 de cette intervention puisqu&rsquo;il nous suffit d&rsquo;observer qu&rsquo;elle a eu lieu et qu&rsquo;elle confirme ainsi le caract\u00e8re d&rsquo;instabilit\u00e9 et d&rsquo;impr\u00e9dictibilit\u00e9 que Donald Trump a introduit dans le cours si bien ordonn\u00e9 du processus des pr\u00e9sidentielles, et de la politique washingtonienne en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral. Contentons-nous de noter qu&rsquo;<em>Infowars.com <\/em>a pris la chose au pied de la lettre, bien entendu sans se prononcer mais pour au moins rappeler les prises de position du vieux guerrier antiguerre. Dans les extraits d&rsquo;interventions que <a href=\"http:\/\/www.infowars.com\/ron-paul-secretary-of-state\/\">Kurt Nimmo mentionne<\/a>, on trouve, comme par hasard, un segment o&ugrave; Ron Paul glisse le slogan de Donald Trump : <em>America First<\/em>. M\u00eame si pour beaucoup d&rsquo;autre chose Paul diff\u00e8re de Trump, au moins sur ce cas du choix des mots il s&rsquo;agit bien de la m\u00eame boutique. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><p>&laquo; <em>On Wednesday, the neocon journalist Jennifer Rubin tweeted under the hashtag #thingstoworryabout. She is afraid Ron Paul will be selected as Secretary of State in a Trump administration. Rubin, described as a \u00ab\u00a0conservative\u00a0\u00bb journalist, works for The Washington Post where she espouses the neocon line on foreign policy. As an advocate for \u00ab\u00a0American exceptionalism,\u00a0\u00bb she supports military intervention and the never-ending war on terror<\/em>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>&raquo; <em>So far, Donald Trump has not said he will appoint Ron Paul as Secretary of State<\/em>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>&raquo; <em>It&rsquo;s a great idea, though<\/em>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>&raquo; <em>As Secretary of State, Paul would rollback Pax Americana and pursue a policy of noninterventionism. He would follow George Washington&rsquo;s advice and oppose entangling alliances with other nations and wars of aggression. Paul would bring the troops home from hundreds of US bases in Korea, Japan, Europe and elsewhere around the world. He would shut down foreign aid. He rejects the dangerous confrontation with Iran, the embargo against Cuba, and military actions elsewhere. He advocates ending US participation in the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan<\/em>. [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>&raquo; <em>\u00ab\u00a0Look, we are bankrupt as a nation,\u00a0\u00bb Paul explained during his bid for the presidency. \u00ab\u00a0Our army marches in Chinese boots, while our air force flies on Saudi oil. We cannot continue to enforce a Pax Americana while our southern border allows illegals and terrorists to pour into our country. And we certainly shouldn&rsquo;t be footing the defense bill for countries with whom our industries compete in the global marketplace. Bring our soldiers home. Secure <strong>America first<\/strong>.\u00a0\u00bb<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>&raquo; <em>Neocons are in dire fear Trump will institute Paul&rsquo;s libertarian values on foreign policy and shut down the neocon war machine. That&rsquo;s why they are scrambling to undermine his presidential bid. That&rsquo;s why they proposed a third party running Mitt Romney and Marco Rubio<\/em>. &raquo;<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>Mis en ligne le 5 mai 2016 \u00e0 19H03<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Oups&#8230; Ron Paul, secr\u00e9taire d&rsquo;&Eacute;tat ? C&rsquo;est une blague, ce n&rsquo;est pas une blague ; c&rsquo;est un ballon d&rsquo;essai, c&rsquo;est de la provoc&rsquo;, c&rsquo;est n&rsquo;importe quoi, etc., &ndash; choisissez&#8230; C&rsquo;est dans tous les cas, \u00e0 notre sens, un premier signe de ce qui nous attend avec The Donald, d\u00e9sormais candidat quasi-d\u00e9sign\u00e9 du parti r\u00e9publicain :&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[11773,6985,4301,2639],"class_list":["post-76555","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-breves-de-crise","tag-jennifer","tag-libertarien","tag-rubin","tag-trump"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76555","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=76555"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76555\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=76555"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=76555"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=76555"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}