Il semble d\u00e9sormais que Bernie Sanders soit vraiment sur le sentier de la guerre, c’est-\u00e0-dire sur le sentier de la r\u00e9volte contre la direction du parti d\u00e9mocrate. Il ne lutte plus seulement pour sa d\u00e9signation, ou dans tous les cas contre la d\u00e9signation d’Hillary Clinton, mais contre la direction du parti elle-m\u00eame, c’est-\u00e0-dire contre Debbie Wasserman Schultz, pr\u00e9sidente du DNC (Democratic National Committee<\/em>). Cette affaire est tr\u00e8s symbolique, extr\u00eamement significative dans le contexte du processus politicien US parce qu’il s’agit l\u00e0 d’une attaque contre la structure m\u00eame du parti.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Wasserman Schultz, estime Sanders, est de parti pris, elle est pro-Clinton alors qu’en principe le pr\u00e9sident du parti doit \u00eatre neutre dans le processus de s\u00e9lection du candidat. Sanders ne se contente pas de critiquer Wasserman Schultz, il agit contre elle en recommandant \u00e0 ceux qui le soutiennent de soutenir \u00e9galement financi\u00e8rement l’adversaire de Wasserman Schultz dans sa campagne \u00e9lectorale (Wasserman Schultz a un si\u00e8ge \u00e0 la Chambre, dont elle demande le renouvellement lors des \u00e9lections g\u00e9n\u00e9rales qui accompagneront l’\u00e9lection pr\u00e9sidentielle de novembre prochain). Le langage employ\u00e9 est essentiellement de type \u00ab\u00a0r\u00e9volutionnaire\u00a0\u00bb, antiSyst\u00e8me.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Le commentaire de Washington Examiner<\/em> du 22 mai<\/a> qui pr\u00e9sente la nouvelle indique clairement qu’il s’agit d’un ferment de division de plus \u00e0 l’int\u00e9rieur du parti d\u00e9mocrate, et cela pourrait conduire \u00e0 des troubles importants lors de la convention de juillet alors que Sanders conteste plus que jamais le syst\u00e8me des superdelegates<\/em> d\u00e9sign\u00e9s par le parti, qui donnent son avance \u00e0 Hillary. Il est d\u00e9sormais possible que le clan-Sanders cherche \u00e0 d\u00e9clencher une v\u00e9ritable insurrection et que le parti d\u00e9mocrate soit, \u00e0 son tour et apr\u00e8s le parti r\u00e9publicain vaincu par Trump, menac\u00e9 d’implosion. C’est bien tout le syst\u00e8me de l’am\u00e9ricanisme qui est touch\u00e9 par le s\u00e9isme.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n « Bernie Sanders’ presidential campaign has begun raising money for Democratic National Committee chair Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s primary opponent, threatening to further divide Democrats even as Party leaders hope to unite the Party behind Hillary Clinton. Sanders spoke out against Wasserman Schultz in an interview that aired Sunday on CNN, during which he said he "clearly<\/a>" favored her opponent, Tim Canova. Now, he’s wading in with an active role against her.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n » Sanders is using his campaign’s fundraising lists to raise big bucks to oust Wasserman Schultz from her Florida congressional seat. The fundraising pitch from Sanders campaign manager Jeff Weaver urges progressives to give money to help Canova. \u00ab\u00a0The political revolution is not just about electing a president. We need a Congress with members who believe, like Bernie, that we cannot change a corrupt system by taking its money,\u00a0\u00bb Weaver wrote. \u00ab\u00a0Splitting a $2.70 contribution between Bernie 2016 and Tim Canova for Congress will help elect progressives up and down the ballot while sending an UNMISTAKABLE message about out political revolutions commitment to electing candidates who share our values.\u00a0\u00bb <\/em>»<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Mis en ligne le 23 mai 2016 \u00e0 12H55<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Alors Sanders, une VRAIE r\u00e9volte ? Il semble d\u00e9sormais que Bernie Sanders soit vraiment sur le sentier de la guerre, c’est-\u00e0-dire sur le sentier de la r\u00e9volte contre la direction du parti d\u00e9mocrate. Il ne lutte plus seulement pour sa d\u00e9signation, ou dans tous les cas contre la d\u00e9signation d’Hillary Clinton, mais contre la direction… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[7423,3009,8698,8327,8124,13580],"class_list":["post-76583","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-breves-de-crise","tag-convention","tag-democrates","tag-insurrection","tag-sanders","tag-schultz","tag-wasserman"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76583","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=76583"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76583\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=76583"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=76583"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=76583"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}