Obama a cr\u00e9\u00e9 une surprise au sommet du G7 ; ou plut\u00f4t en marge du sommet, dans la d\u00e9claration qu’il a faite. En plus des banalit\u00e9s habituelles et sans le moindre int\u00e9r\u00eat, on trouve quelques phrases sur la candidature de Donald Trump, pour la d\u00e9noncer, et pour annoncer que les autres glorieux leaders du G7 la d\u00e9noncent \u00e9galement. Cette unanimit\u00e9 est du pain b\u00e9ni pour Trump qui va pouvoir encore renforcer, en capitalisant sur la d\u00e9testation universelle que les peuples manifestent \u00e0 \u00ab\u00a0nos glorieux leaders\u00a0\u00bb, sa position d’antiSyst\u00e8me \u00e0 tr\u00e8s peu de frais. C’est ce que signale ZeroHedge.com<\/em>, dans sa nouvelle du 26 mai<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Par contre, Obama a assur\u00e9 que Hillary Clinton et Bernie Sanders, les deux pr\u00e9tendants \u00e0 la d\u00e9signation d\u00e9mocrate, feraient de l’excellent boulot, et, laisse-t-il sous-entendre ou comprenons-nous mal, qu’ils sont tous deux \u00ab\u00a0acceptables\u00a0\u00bb pour les \u00ab\u00a0glorieux leaders\u00a0\u00bb. Curieux enchaînement, 1) au moment ou Hillary \u00ab\u00a0Crooke<\/em>\u00a0\u00bb Clinton prend une \u00e9norme patate de la part du d\u00e9partement d’État, et 2) où Sanders ne cesse de montrer une attitude de plus en plus agressive vis-\u00e0-vis de l’establishment<\/em> de son parti et de d\u00e9noncer les manœuvres ill\u00e9gales de Clinton contre lui. On voit mal dans quelle mesure le fait qu’Obama les mette tous deux dans le m\u00eame sac en concluant qu'\u00a0\u00bbils s’orientent tous deux dans la m\u00eame direction<\/em>\u00ab\u00a0, puisse satisfaire quiconque chez les d\u00e9mocrates, Clinton elle-m\u00eame, les partisans de Sanders qui veulent \u00e0 tout pris construire une candidature antiSyst\u00e8me, etc.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n L’un dans l’autre, on s’interrogera donc sur l’int\u00e9r\u00eat de cette \u00ab\u00a0annonce-surprise\u00a0\u00bb qui n’\u00e9tait nullement obligatoire pour Obama, et qui met \u00e0 peu pr\u00e8s tout le monde dans l’embarras sans apporter la moindre aide \u00e0 quiconque, sinon \u00e0 celui contre lequel le monde entier est cens\u00e9 se liguer<\/strong>. Cette interf\u00e9rence dans les affaires int\u00e9rieures US encourag\u00e9e et relay\u00e9e par le pr\u00e9sident en exercice est une originalit\u00e9 pittoresque qui devrait ajouter au chaos de la col\u00e8re des \u00e9lecteurs US, cela qui ne peut que ravir Trump. Y a-t-il une manœuvre tordue chez Obama dans cette d\u00e9claration ? Comme d’habitude, nous opterons pour l’explication alternative et la plus simple de l’ignorance compl\u00e8te de la v\u00e9rit\u00e9-de-situation de nos dirigeants qui « ne voient rien venir<\/a>,<\/em> [qui] r\u00e9pondent \u00e0 un coup dur par une posture qui les expose \u00e0 un coup encore plus dur<\/em> ». (Ou bien, comme d’habitude, Obama s’en fout et s’amuse-t-il \u00e0 alimenter le chaos, habit\u00e9 par un secret penchant pour Trump.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n « While the G7 summit in Japan continued to press well-known themes, with the general consensus being that world leaders would continue pushing against competitive FX devaluations (a jab pointed once again at Japan as suggested by this weekend’s meeting of finance ministers and central bankers), Merkel adding that there is hardly any leeway left for monetary policy and Abe saving some face by adding that the G7 agreed the global economy is facing big risks, the biggest surprise out of this latest statement was Obama’s comments on Donald Trump.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n » In a statement to the press, Obama said that world leaders are \u00ab\u00a0rattled\u00a0\u00bb by Republican nominee Donald Trump’s public statements. \u00ab\u00a0They are paying very close attention to this election,\u00a0\u00bb the president told reporters. \u00ab\u00a0I think it’s fair to say they are surprised by the Republican nominee. They are not sure how seriously to take some of his pronouncements, but they are rattled by it.\u00a0\u00bb O<\/strong>bama added that Republican nominee has displayed \u00ab\u00a0ignorance of international affairs or a cavalier attitude or an interest in tweets and headlines rather than thinking through what is required\u00a0\u00bb to keep the world safe. On the other hand, Obama confirmed that both Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders would be a continuation of the status quo by saying \u00ab\u00a0both pointing in the same direction\u00a0\u00bb with policy proposals. \u00ab\u00a0I guarantee you that the eventual nominee sure wishes it were over now because this is a grind. It’s hard<\/em>.\u00a0\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n » And as has been repeatedly the case, in further bracketing Trump as not only an anti US establishment candidate, but one who is disliked by the entire global community, Obama likely just earned the New York billionaire some more votes; it will also provide Trump with further ammo to push his own specific policy agenda<\/em>. »<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Mis en ligne le 26 mai 2016 \u00e0 14H02<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" BHO, agent \u00e9lectoral de Trump ? Obama a cr\u00e9\u00e9 une surprise au sommet du G7 ; ou plut\u00f4t en marge du sommet, dans la d\u00e9claration qu’il a faite. En plus des banalit\u00e9s habituelles et sans le moindre int\u00e9r\u00eat, on trouve quelques phrases sur la candidature de Donald Trump, pour la d\u00e9noncer, et pour annoncer que… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[934,7258,7844,3278,6208,8327,4737,2639],"class_list":["post-76590","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-breves-de-crise","tag-clinton","tag-donald","tag-g7","tag-hillary","tag-obama","tag-sanders","tag-soutien","tag-trump"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76590","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=76590"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76590\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=76590"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=76590"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=76590"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}\n