{"id":76603,"date":"2016-06-03T15:38:38","date_gmt":"2016-06-03T15:38:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2016\/06\/03\/flynn-prefere-the-donald\/"},"modified":"2016-06-03T15:38:38","modified_gmt":"2016-06-03T15:38:38","slug":"flynn-prefere-the-donald","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2016\/06\/03\/flynn-prefere-the-donald\/","title":{"rendered":"Flynn pr\u00e9f\u00e8re The Donald<\/em>"},"content":{"rendered":"

Flynn pr\u00e9f\u00e8re The Donald<\/em> <\/h2>\n<\/p>\n

Pendant qu’Hillary Clinton faisait un discours de politique \u00e9trang\u00e8re où elle exaltait \u00ab\u00a0sa comp\u00e9tence\u00a0\u00bb contre le \u00ab\u00a0caract\u00e8re instable\u00a0\u00bb de Trump, un avis de poids, du c\u00f4t\u00e9 militaire, est venu la contredire directement. Le g\u00e9n\u00e9ral Flynn, ancien directeur de la DIA qu’on connaît<\/a> bien<\/a>, a estim\u00e9 qu’il serait bien plus \u00e0 l’aise avec Trump comme \u00ab\u00a0commandant-en-chef\u00a0\u00bb (titre officiellement port\u00e9 par le pr\u00e9sident des États-Unis), qu’Hillary \u00e0 ce poste. Il est assez remarquable que Flynn ait d\u00e9nonc\u00e9 Hillary d’abord pour son caract\u00e8re (menteuse publique et sciemment irresponsable vis-\u00e0-vis du maniement des informations classifi\u00e9es) alors qu’Hillary faisait le proc\u00e8s du caract\u00e8re de Trump.Il est \u00e9galement remarquable d’entendre avec quelle fermet\u00e9 de jugement est-il affirm\u00e9, par un officier g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de ce rang et de cette exp\u00e9rience, combien toutes les grandes initiatives de politique ext\u00e9rieure de Clinton et opar cons\u00e9quent de l’administration Obama (Libye, Daesh<\/em>, Iran, Yemen, relations avec la Russie, avec la Chine, etc.), sont des \u00e9checs.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\n

Cette prise de position de Flynn, – qu’on a d\u00e9j\u00e0 \u00e9voqu\u00e9 comme penchant du c\u00f4t\u00e9 de Trump<\/a>, – est importante au niveau des r\u00e9seaux et experts encore s\u00e9rieux et responsables des milieux de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 nationale \u00e0 Washington, \u00e0 cause de son comportement d’une rare honn\u00eatet\u00e9 et d’ind\u00e9pendance d’esprit. Flynn confirme la crainte qu’on expose g\u00e9n\u00e9ralement d’avoir avec Hillary Clinton \u00e0 la Maison-Blanche une personne extr\u00eamement dangereuse<\/strong> : Clinton a pos\u00e9 la question de savoir s’il \u00e9tait sage de donner les codes des forces d’attaque nucl\u00e9aire US \u00e0 un homme tel que Trump, ce qui invite instantan\u00e9ment \u00e0 lui retourner la question, – la concernant, elle. (Ci-dessous, quelques extraits des d\u00e9clarations de Flynn sur Fox.News<\/em>, rapport\u00e9es par Washington Examiner<\/em> le 3 juin<\/a>.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

« Former Defense Intelligence Agency Director retired Lt. Gen Michael Flynn faulted Hillary Clinton’s foreign policy experiences, classifying all of them as failures during a Thursday night interview on Fox News. Flynn said he would describe presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump as a \u00ab\u00a0more secure\u00a0\u00bb commander in chief because Clinton, the likely Democratic nominee, has a record of lying to the public.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

» \u00ab\u00a0She talked about people who are dangerous. I mean, a secretary of state who lies to the American public, a secretary of state who uses an unsecure email server to send and receive highly classified national security information, knowing that she is not doing the right thing," Flynn said. "When you look at some of the actions that she was directly involved in — the rise of the Islamic State, the failure of Libya, the failure of the Russian reset, the failure of the pivot to the Pacific with, you know, with China — nobody talks that about it anymore it was such a failure,\u00a0\u00bb continued Flynn. \u00ab\u00a0I could go on and on — the Iranian nuclear deal which she was directly involved in, Yemen. I mean, there are so many things that she touched are just utter failures.\u00a0\u00bb<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

» The former top defense official admitted while he does not agree with all of Trump’s foreign policy and military views, the two do share common ground on the issues, including boosting the economy. \u00ab\u00a0The greatest threat to our country right now is our economy. Number one, there is no doubt about it in my mind,\u00a0\u00bb Flynn said. "Hillary Clinton in that speech — she didn’t talk much about the economy. She really didn’t. She talked about sort of these lofty things and really didn’t dive into the things that I believe the American public cares about which is the economy of our country.\u00a0\u00bb<\/em> »<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Mis en ligne le 3 juin 2016 \u00e0 15H36<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Flynn pr\u00e9f\u00e8re The Donald Pendant qu’Hillary Clinton faisait un discours de politique \u00e9trang\u00e8re où elle exaltait \u00ab\u00a0sa comp\u00e9tence\u00a0\u00bb contre le \u00ab\u00a0caract\u00e8re instable\u00a0\u00bb de Trump, un avis de poids, du c\u00f4t\u00e9 militaire, est venu la contredire directement. Le g\u00e9n\u00e9ral Flynn, ancien directeur de la DIA qu’on connaît bien, a estim\u00e9 qu’il serait bien plus \u00e0 l’aise… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[6536,934,3032,2926,3278,17548,2639],"class_list":["post-76603","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-breves-de-crise","tag-caractere","tag-clinton","tag-dia","tag-flynn","tag-hillary","tag-menteuse","tag-trump"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76603","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=76603"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76603\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=76603"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=76603"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=76603"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}