{"id":76608,"date":"2016-06-08T08:01:13","date_gmt":"2016-06-08T08:01:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2016\/06\/08\/aragonupdated-la-lgtbq-est-lavenir-de-lhomme-1\/"},"modified":"2016-06-08T08:01:13","modified_gmt":"2016-06-08T08:01:13","slug":"aragonupdated-la-lgtbq-est-lavenir-de-lhomme-1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2016\/06\/08\/aragonupdated-la-lgtbq-est-lavenir-de-lhomme-1\/","title":{"rendered":"Aragon\u00a0updated <\/em>: \u201cLa LGTBQ+ est l’avenir de l’homme\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"

Aragon updated <\/em>: \u00ab\u00a0La LGTBQ+ est l’avenir de l’homme\u00a0\u00bb<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n

Hillary \u00e9tait-elle raciste parce qu’elle affrontait Obama dans les primaires en 2008 ? (Obama est-il sexiste parce qu’il a battu Hillary dans les primaires en 2008 ? Deschamps est-il raciste parce qu’il ne s\u00e9lectionne pas Benz\u00e9ma ? \u00ab\u00a0Suis-je quelquiste [contre ‘quelque chose en isme’] parce que je n’\u00e9cris pas en faveur de ‘quelque chose en isme ?’). Aujourd’hui, il semble que la dynamique LGTBQ+<\/a> est devenue une force politique de premier plan, qui conditionne toute vertu d\u00e9mocratique, r\u00e8gle la marche de l’esprit et impose \u00e0 la logique d’argumenter selon les seuls crit\u00e8res de race (non, de groupes ethniques) et de sexe (non, de genre)<\/strong>. Sanders s’en est aper\u00e7u lorsqu’une journaliste lui a pos\u00e9 la question : « Qu’est-ce que vous dites aux femmes qui vous disent que rester dans le course contre Hillary est \u00eatre sexiste parce que cela pourrait emp\u00eacher une femme d’\u00eatre la premi\u00e8re pr\u00e9sidente des États-Unis ?<\/em> »<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\n

Sanders a ri, et nous esp\u00e9rons (pour lui, pour sa s\u00e9curit\u00e9 car les tribunaux veillent) que son rire \u00e9tait un peu jaune parce que cette intervention \u00e9tait extr\u00eamement s\u00e9rieuses<\/strong>. Sanders a demand\u00e9, \u00e0 la reporteuse (puisqu’il s’agit d’une personne individuelle & libre du genre f\u00e9minin) s’il s’agissait d’une question s\u00e9rieuse, pour lui expliquer l\u00e0-dessus que l’on ne pouvait d\u00e9terminer un choix de comp\u00e9tence sur le seul crit\u00e8re de race (non, eu groupe ethnique) et de sexe (non, de genre), que c’\u00e9tait simplement d\u00e9raisonnable, sinon d\u00e9mence pure et pas toujours douce. Sanders n’a pas vu la nouvelle aube se lever et Aragon dans sa tombe doit songer \u00e0 r\u00e9viser en le pr\u00e9cisant son vers sur « La femme est l’avenir de l’homme<\/a><\/em> ».<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

La reporteuse (genre f\u00e9minin) a un peu battu en retraite parce qu’il lui a soudain sembl\u00e9 que sa vie \u00e9tait peut-\u00eatre un danger, un tueur nomm\u00e9 \u00ab\u00a0ridicule\u00a0\u00bb, certes agonisant mais qui encore capable d’un dernier spasme, pouvait encore avoir sa peau. Elle a r\u00e9p\u00e9t\u00e9 sa question en passant sur le terrain des forces en pr\u00e9sence, mais ce qui avait \u00e9t\u00e9 dit l’avait \u00e9t\u00e9, confirmant (voir plus haut) que la logique LGTBQ+ est bien aujourd’hui la r\u00e9f\u00e9rence majeure du g\u00e9nie humain<\/strong>. La reporteuse ne vient pas d’un de ce vulgaires sites alternatifs, sans aucune qualification professionnelle, tous ces faux-journalistes-bidon, hein, mais de rien de moins que du New York Times<\/em>. On lit ici, avec des pincettes et en surveillant ses arri\u00e8re-arri\u00e8re-pens\u00e9es, ce que nous rapporte DailyCaller<\/em> le 7 juin<\/a>…<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

« A New York Times reporter asked Bernie Sanders on Monday if it is sexist for him to continue running for president against what could be the nation’s first female president in Hillary Clinton. Sanders bristled at the question but also laughed and asked if the reporter, Yamiche Alcindor, was being serious. The exchange occurred after Sanders opened up his press conference in Emeryville, Calif. to questions from reporters. He pointed to one member of the press in the audience, but Alcindor appears to have jumped in with a question. Sanders attempted to cut her off, saying \u00ab\u00a0excuse me\u00a0\u00bb several times. But Alcindor continued. \u00ab\u00a0What do you say to women that say you staying in the race is sexist because it could get in the way of what could be the first female president?\u00a0\u00bb she asked. It is unclear which women believe that it is sexist for the 74-year-old to continue running for president against Clinton.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

» \u00ab\u00a0Is that a serious question?\u00a0\u00bb Sanders responded. \u00ab\u00a0That any woman running for president, anyone who opposes — your question implies that any woman, that any person, any woman who is running for president is by definition the best candidate.\u00a0\u00bb \u00ab\u00a0So any woman who runs — to say that it is sexist, that any — so if Hillary Clinton runs for president is your point, that it is sexist for any man to oppose her?\u00a0\u00bb<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

» \u00ab\u00a0No, my point is if she has more delegates than you,\u00a0\u00bb Alcindor responded. \u00ab\u00a0Then that is another point,\u00a0\u00bb Sanders responded. \u00ab\u00a0That is not — I don’t think it is sexist. I think that the issue is, first of all, our focus right now is running and winning right here in California.\u00a0\u00bb<\/em> »<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Mis en ligne le 8 juin 2016 \u00e0 07H50<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Aragon updated : \u00ab\u00a0La LGTBQ+ est l’avenir de l’homme\u00a0\u00bb Hillary \u00e9tait-elle raciste parce qu’elle affrontait Obama dans les primaires en 2008 ? (Obama est-il sexiste parce qu’il a battu Hillary dans les primaires en 2008 ? Deschamps est-il raciste parce qu’il ne s\u00e9lectionne pas Benz\u00e9ma ? \u00ab\u00a0Suis-je quelquiste [contre ‘quelque chose en isme’] parce que… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[934,9273,17556,3278,3256,7347,13288,8327,2852,3257],"class_list":["post-76608","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-breves-de-crise","tag-clinton","tag-feministe","tag-fgbtq","tag-hillary","tag-new","tag-primaires","tag-raciste","tag-sanders","tag-times","tag-york"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76608","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=76608"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76608\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=76608"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=76608"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=76608"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}