{"id":76613,"date":"2016-06-10T08:32:58","date_gmt":"2016-06-10T08:32:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2016\/06\/10\/bho-soutient-hillary-comme-unesoft-corde\/"},"modified":"2016-06-10T08:32:58","modified_gmt":"2016-06-10T08:32:58","slug":"bho-soutient-hillary-comme-unesoft-corde","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2016\/06\/10\/bho-soutient-hillary-comme-unesoft-corde\/","title":{"rendered":"BHO soutient Hillary, comme une\u00a0soft<\/em>-corde…"},"content":{"rendered":"

BHO soutient Hillary, comme une soft<\/em>-corde…<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n

Le pr\u00e9sident Obama vient de nous annoncer qu’il soutient Hillary Clinton, et m\u00eame, comble du comble, qu’il la soutient dans son cœur depuis le premier jour<\/a> mais qu’il entendait ne pas interf\u00e9rer sur la comp\u00e9tition entre d\u00e9mocrates ret avait ainsi cach\u00e9 sa pr\u00e9f\u00e9rence. Le brave homme. (Son second, le VP Biden, nous r\u00e9v\u00e8le d’autre part, pour compl\u00e9ter notre docu, que c’est Dieu Lui-M\u00eame<\/a> qui veut qu’Hillary soit pr\u00e9sidente. Le saint homme.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\n

Il faut reconnaître \u00e0 BHO l’art de la f\u00e9lonie, ce qui montre qu’il a parfaitement appris du Syst\u00e8me qui, in illo tempore<\/em>, tenait ses p\u00e8res et anc\u00eatres en esclavage. D’un c\u00f4t\u00e9, il dit et fait dire qu’Hillary est la candidate de sa raison, de son cœur, voire de son \u00e2me, et en m\u00eame temps il laisse dire par son porte-parole, incidemment, ou plut\u00f4t lui fait dire express\u00e9ment<\/a><\/strong>, – pr\u00e9somption de culpabilit\u00e9, selon les normes antiSyst\u00e8me absolument justifi\u00e9es, – que la proc\u00e9dure suivie par le FBI concernant emailgate<\/em> est une \u00ab\u00a0criminal investigation<\/em>\u00a0\u00bb alors qu’Hillary s’\u00e9chine depuis deux ans \u00e0 ne parler que de \u00ab\u00a0security review<\/em>\u00ab\u00a0.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

La nuance p\u00e8se le poids de ces tonnes d’affection du pr\u00e9sident US pour son ancienne Secr\u00e9taire d’État et candidate-successeur. Elle est extr\u00eamement vicieuse, puisque pour une fois Hillary ne ment qu’\u00e0 demi (une \u00ab\u00a0criminal investigation<\/em>\u00a0\u00bb est, dans ce cas, n\u00e9cessairement une \u00ab\u00a0security review<\/em>\u00ab\u00a0, – mais pas que…). Moyennant quoi, l’\u00e9p\u00e9e de Damocl\u00e8s est toujours l\u00e0<\/strong>, et l’on pourra appr\u00e9cier le tranchant de l’outil en consultant le prodigieux catalogue<\/a> dress\u00e9 par Washington Examiner<\/em> de toutes les d\u00e9clarations d’Hillary depuis le 1er<\/sup> f\u00e9vrier 2013 concernant cette affaire. Prodigieux catalogue de tous les mensonges possibles et imaginables, d\u00e9clin\u00e9s sur tous les tons, autour d’un seul et m\u00eame th\u00e8me… Voici donc comment le porte-parole de la Maison-Blanche a pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 la proc\u00e9dure de probable culpabilit\u00e9 en cours contre l’innocence personnifi\u00e9e qu’est la bonne Hillary (ce qui ne garantit ni que la culpabilit\u00e9 soit un jour proclam\u00e9e, ni l’inoccence un autre jour reconnue…).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

« White House press secretary Josh Earnest on Thursday referred to the probe into Hillary Clinton’s private email system as a possible \u00ab\u00a0criminal investigation,\u00a0\u00bb which Republicans quickly seized on as a critical slip just moments after President Obama endorsed Clinton for president.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

» Earnest was asked whether the FBI might be pressured to go easy on Clinton in the investigation in light of Obama’s endorsement, and used the term \u00ab\u00a0criminal investigation\u00a0\u00bb in his answer. \u00ab\u00a0That’s why the president, when discussing this issue in each stage, has reiterated his commitment to this principle that any criminal investigation should be conducted independent of any sort of political interference and that people should be treated the same way before the law regardless of their political influence, regardless of their political party, regardless of their political stature and regardless of what political figure has endorsed them,\u00a0\u00bb he said.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

» Clinton has tried to downplay the investigation as a \u00ab\u00a0security review,\u00a0\u00bb but Republicans jumped at Earnest’s formulation as a sign it may be much worst for Clinton. The Republican National Committee sent out an email arguing that Earnest \u00ab\u00a0lets slip that the FBI probe into her emails is criminal in nature.\u00a0\u00bb \u00ab\u00a0The White House’s admission that the FBI is investigating Hillary Clinton’s email server as a ‘criminal’ matter shreds her dishonest claim that it is a routine \u00ab\u00a0security inquiry,'\u00a0\u00bb RNC spokesman Michael Short said in a statement Thursday afternoon. \u00ab\u00a0This is another reminder of her reckless conduct as Obama’s secretary of state, where her attempt to skirt government transparency laws exposed highly classified information and put our national security at risk.\u00a0\u00bb<\/em> »<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Mis en ligne le 10 juin 2016 \u00e0 08H32<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

BHO soutient Hillary, comme une soft-corde… Le pr\u00e9sident Obama vient de nous annoncer qu’il soutient Hillary Clinton, et m\u00eame, comble du comble, qu’il la soutient dans son cœur depuis le premier jour mais qu’il entendait ne pas interf\u00e9rer sur la comp\u00e9tition entre d\u00e9mocrates ret avait ainsi cach\u00e9 sa pr\u00e9f\u00e9rence. Le brave homme. (Son second, le… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[934,17563,17320,2838,3278,17564,6208,3340,3167,6568],"class_list":["post-76613","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-breves-de-crise","tag-clinton","tag-criminal","tag-emailgate","tag-fbi","tag-hillary","tag-investigation","tag-obama","tag-presidentielles","tag-review","tag-security"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76613","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=76613"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76613\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=76613"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=76613"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=76613"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}