La convention d\u00e9mocrate de 2016 est un d\u00e9sastre sans pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent, du plus haut au plus bas. (L’organisation fut aussi mauvaise que l’\u00e9tat du parti apr\u00e8s la d\u00e9mission de sa pr\u00e9sidente, et que l’\u00e9tat permanent de sa candidate. « Who’s In Charge?!<\/em> » s’exclamait lundi un d\u00e9l\u00e9gu\u00e9 d\u00e9mocrate pour Daily Caller<\/em>, qui titrait : « It’s Day One And The DNC Is Already Falling Apart<\/em> » pour son texte du 25 juillet<\/a>.) Voici comment est d\u00e9crite l ‘intervention d’Hillary Clinton apr\u00e8s sa nomination (Daily Caller<\/em> toujours, le 28 juillet<\/a>, auquel on peut ajouter une interview de Tucker Carlson, directeur de Daily Caller<\/em>, \u00e9galement le 28 juillet<\/a>). Il s’agit donc du dernier discours, celui d’Hillary, d’une convention qui \u00e9volua de chaos en chaos <\/strong>et mit en \u00e9vidence une extraordinaire rupture \u00e0 l’int\u00e9rieur du parti (entre les pro-Hillary\/pro-Syst\u00e8me et les supporteurs de Sanders), en m\u00eame temps que la d\u00e9cadence acc\u00e9l\u00e9r\u00e9e de ce parti entre sa corruption extr\u00eame où il semble d\u00e9passer les r\u00e9publicains, et les slogans affich\u00e9s de progressisme et de justice sociale, cmmunautaire, etc. : <\/p>\n<\/p>\n « Hillary Clinton officially accepted the Democratic nomination for president amid a series of boos and catcalls Thursday night at the Democratic National Convention. As soon as the roars of applause died down and Clinton began her speech, loud boos erupted in several parts of the arena, disrupting an otherwise weighty moment. Scattered shouting continued through the first few minutes of her speech, although the audience tried to drown them out by chanting \u00ab\u00a0Hillary! Hillary!\u00a0\u00bb<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n » The loud chanting drowned out some of the calls and some protesters were reportedly ejected from the arena, but the spontaneous chanting and continuing boos created a distracting atmosphere, apparently making it difficult at times for Clinton to get through her speech. \u00ab\u00a0The boos & catcalls from Sanders supporters during Hillary speech at [DNC] are distracting, even watching on tv,\u00a0\u00bb tweeted Republican Sen. Marco Rubio, who ended his campaign for the Republican nomination earlier this year. \u00ab\u00a0What a disaster.\u00a0\u00bb<\/em> »<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Sur la candidate elle-m\u00eame, on lira l’\u00e9ditorial du Washington Examiner<\/em> (du 29 juillet<\/a>), qui s’appuie sur rien de moins que l’\u00e9vidence du constat, – par ce titre du type \u00ab\u00a0vous imaginez devoir vous taper quatre ans de pr\u00e9sidence-Clinton ?\u00a0\u00bb (« Really? You want to listen to Clinton for four years? <\/em>»)<\/strong>. Avant m\u00eame qu’il soit question de l’\u00e9lire, l’\u00e9lectorat, y compris l’\u00e9lectorat d\u00e9mocrate, a la naus\u00e9e d’Hillary Clinton, et le seul argument qu’ils (les dirigeants d\u00e9mocrates) puissent d\u00e9velopper est le pi\u00e8tre argument par d\u00e9faut : \u00ab\u00a0Il ne faut \u00e0 aucun prix que Trump soit \u00e9lu… Alors bon, il reste Hillary….\u00a0\u00bb.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n « The Democrats’ thin presidential field set them up for the inevitable choice of an uninspired and uninspiring candidate, who is already well-defined in the public mind as a political hack. She is not only the status quo candidate, but also a person characterized by incessant, self-serving lies, unbounded venality and the evident belief that rules are for people less important than herself. This week’s convention has been an effort to reinvent Clinton — how many times has that been tried? — but it was a waste of their time<\/em>. […]<\/p>\n<\/p>\n » She’s just so uninspiring. We’re still more than three months away from the election, and already people are bored with her. It takes most presidents about seven years to get to this point<\/strong>. Sen. Chuck Schumer said Thursday that Trump has reached his high water mark, but Democrats left their convention nervous. Clinton’s campaign manager is in denial about her unpopularity<\/a>, which stems from the fact that about 70 percent of the public believes her to be dishonest and untrustworthy<\/em>. »<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Mis en ligne le 29 juillet 2016 \u00e0 16H43<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" La catastrophique Hillary La convention d\u00e9mocrate de 2016 est un d\u00e9sastre sans pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent, du plus haut au plus bas. (L’organisation fut aussi mauvaise que l’\u00e9tat du parti apr\u00e8s la d\u00e9mission de sa pr\u00e9sidente, et que l’\u00e9tat permanent de sa candidate. « Who’s In Charge?! » s’exclamait lundi un d\u00e9l\u00e9gu\u00e9 d\u00e9mocrate pour Daily Caller, qui titrait… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[934,7423,16708,6125,5593,3278,3029,2639],"class_list":["post-76695","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-breves-de-crise","tag-clinton","tag-convention","tag-defaut","tag-democrate","tag-election","tag-hillary","tag-par","tag-trump"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76695","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=76695"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76695\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=76695"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=76695"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=76695"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}