{"id":76853,"date":"2016-10-22T15:54:10","date_gmt":"2016-10-22T15:54:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2016\/10\/22\/rigged-usa-sondages-dechaines-en-terra-incognita\/"},"modified":"2016-10-22T15:54:10","modified_gmt":"2016-10-22T15:54:10","slug":"rigged-usa-sondages-dechaines-en-terra-incognita","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2016\/10\/22\/rigged-usa-sondages-dechaines-en-terra-incognita\/","title":{"rendered":"Rigged USA<\/em>, sondages d\u00e9cha\u00een\u00e9s en terra incognita<\/em>"},"content":{"rendered":"

Rigged USA<\/em>, sondages d\u00e9chaîn\u00e9s en terra incognita<\/em><\/h2>\n<\/p>\n

Il y a deux jours, trois jours, tout paraissait jou\u00e9, – disons pour Hillary Clinton, car chaque fois le balancier est ramen\u00e9 vers elle, de force peut-\u00eatre, de force s’il le faut<\/strong>… On parle du balancier des sondages, dont tout le monde dit qu’il indique Clinton victorieuse, et dont presque autant de monde rel\u00e8ve r\u00e9guli\u00e8rement qu’il rencontre soubresauts importants… Le sondage quotidien IBD\/TTIP, qui proclame son efficacit\u00e9 (« a collaboration between Investor’s Business Daily (IBD) and TechnoMetrica Market Intelligence (TIPP)<\/em> […] the most accurate poll in recent presidential elections<\/a><\/em> »), qui donne Trump en t\u00eate depuis plusieurs jours, et encore ce 22 octobre<\/a>, il y a quelques heures, avec 42%-40% pour lui.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Qui peut r\u00e9pondre de quoi ? Plane l’ombre du Brexit<\/em> et de ses erreurs de pronostics, bruissent dans le silence assourdissant de la presse-Syst\u00e8me les r\u00e9v\u00e9lations \u00e0 r\u00e9p\u00e9tition sur a peu pr\u00e8s tout, et d\u00e9sormais sur les conditions où Hillary aurait \u00e9t\u00e9 favoris\u00e9e dans les d\u00e9bats (questions connues d’avance, r\u00e9ponse sur un t\u00e9l\u00e9prompteur discr\u00e8tement install\u00e9 sur son pupitre, – bref, \u00ab\u00a0rigged debates<\/em>\u00ab\u00a0, – le mot \u00ab\u00a0rigged<\/em>\u00a0\u00bb [\u00ab\u00a0truqu\u00e9\u00a0\u00bb], sans doute le plus populaire aujourd’hui aux USA, d\u00e9sormais \u00ab\u00a0empire truqu\u00e9\u00a0\u00bb<\/strong>…)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\n

Rien ni personne ne semble devoir \u00e9branler la certitude-Syst\u00e8me de l’in\u00e9luctable victoire d’Hillary ; rien ni personne ne semble pouvoir faire taire cette in\u00e9branlable incertitude qui mine les esprits et les sondages ; sourires hyst\u00e9riques d’Hillary, sourire satisfait de Trump… « Il se passe quelque chose dans ce pays, dans ces sondages… Ou bien Hillary va glisser subrepticement vers la Maison-Blanche, ou bien nous allons vers les plus grands chocs qu’ait connus la politique am\u00e9ricaine. Cela va vraiment tenir \u00e0 cheveu<\/em> »<\/strong>, dit Pat Caddell, sp\u00e9cialiste des sondages, \u00e0 la radio SiriusXM de Breitbart.News<\/em>, ce 21 octobre 2016<\/a>. Il rel\u00e8ve l’extraordinaire disparit\u00e9 des r\u00e9sultats des sondages, notamment entre les techniques au jour-le-jour, favorables \u00e0 Trump, et les sondages minutieux et pompeux mais v\u00e9rifi\u00e9s par personne des instituts universitaires, qui vont \u00e0 Hillary. Notre sondage \u00e0 nous reste muet…<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

« Pollster and analyst Pat Caddell discussed recent presidential election polling on Friday with Breitbart News Daily SiriusXM host Alex Marlow, saying, \u00ab\u00a0Something is going on in this country in these polls.\u00a0\u00bb \u00ab\u00a0All of the tracking polls keep holding at Trump being ahead,\u00a0\u00bb he continued. \u00ab\u00a0And then all of these other polls that are one-off polls, or whatever … I don’t know how they’re doing some of these university polls. You just put the name of some university and apparently it becomes credible, whether they know what they’re doing, or not.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

» Caddell was pointing out the discrepancy between the different types of polls. \u00ab\u00a0But in any event, polling is all over the place…. Something isn’t adding up,\u00a0\u00bb said Caddell. \u00ab\u00a0Something is going to happen here, I just sense it,\u00a0\u00bb he concluded. Either \u00ab\u00a0Hillary will glide into the White House, or we’re headed for one of the greatest shocks in American politics. I think it’s a very close call. I think the shock potential is enormous.\u00a0\u00bb<\/em> »<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Mis en ligne le 22 octobre 2016 \u00e0 15H47<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Rigged USA, sondages d\u00e9chaîn\u00e9s en terra incognita Il y a deux jours, trois jours, tout paraissait jou\u00e9, – disons pour Hillary Clinton, car chaque fois le balancier est ramen\u00e9 vers elle, de force peut-\u00eatre, de force s’il le faut… On parle du balancier des sondages, dont tout le monde dit qu’il indique Clinton victorieuse, et… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[934,3278,17844,7876,17843,1492,2639,12709,17845],"class_list":["post-76853","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-breves-de-crise","tag-clinton","tag-hillary","tag-ibd","tag-pat","tag-quotidiens","tag-sondages","tag-trump","tag-ttip","tag-waddell"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76853","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=76853"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76853\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=76853"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=76853"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=76853"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}