Hillary est-elle vraiment trop pourrie pour \u00eatre \u00e9lue ? Vaste question<\/strong>… Les livraisons r\u00e9guli\u00e8res de WikiLeaks<\/em> commencent \u00e0 faire beaucoup, beaucoup de d\u00e9g\u00e2ts. M\u00eame les sondages les mieux ajust\u00e9s \u00e0 l’avenir assur\u00e9 d’Hillary Clinton battent de l’aile … M\u00eame CNN commence \u00e0 grogner<\/strong> ; etc.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Partout, Trump remonte (ou bien dira-t-on qu’Hillary descende ?) et les r\u00e9sultats rapprochent de plus en plus les deux candidats. ZeroHedge.com<\/a><\/em> donne une bonne revue de divers chiffres (des sondages) et diff\u00e9rentes interventions, cette fois tout cela venant de la presse-Syst\u00e8me. Il y a de plus en plus de suggestions pressantes pour que les Clinton arr\u00eatent les op\u00e9rations de la Clinton Foundation<\/em> pour limiter les d\u00e9g\u00e2ts, tant cette estim\u00e9e institution croule sous les abus de corruption et divers autres scandales du genre ; mais un tel acte constituerait un aveu retentissant de corruption g\u00e9n\u00e9ralis\u00e9e<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Il y a une sorte d'\u00a0\u00bbeffet de fond\u00a0\u00bb<\/strong> qui est en train de toucher l’\u00e9lectorat en m\u00eame temps qu’une sensation grandissante que le poids des r\u00e9v\u00e9lations de corruption, de scandales, etc., conduit \u00e0 une posture extr\u00eamement d\u00e9licate pour Clinton<\/strong>. D’une fa\u00e7on assez inhabituelle, – cette campagne USA-2016 ne ressemble vraiment \u00e0 aucune autre, – le d\u00e9placement est en train de se faire sans effet de communication sensationnel, sans r\u00e9v\u00e9lation explosive, mais effectivement par une vague constante, un \u00ab\u00a0bruit de fond\u00a0\u00bb de r\u00e9v\u00e9lations d\u00e9sormais courantes<\/strong> qui menacent la navigation de Clinton.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n La candidate favorite sinon d\u00e9j\u00e0 \u00e9lue ressemble de plus en plus \u00e0 un bateau charg\u00e9 jusqu’\u00e0 la gueule (de scandales) mena\u00e7ant de chavirer au moment de s’amarrer, ou \u00e0 une sprinteuse \u00e9puis\u00e9e mena\u00e7ant de s’effondrer \u00e0 quelques m\u00e8tres de la ligne d’arriv\u00e9e ; elle est coutur\u00e9e de cicatrices, de plaies mal soign\u00e9es, accentuant sans cesse son handicap de splendide vainqueur. Le constat s’impose \u00e0 nouveau que l’\u00e9lection n’est absolument pas jou\u00e9e et qu’il est \u00e0 nouveau impossible de pr\u00e9voir qui va l’emporter<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n « As we draw closer to election day, polling data, rigged or not, certainly seems to indicate that the presidential race is tightening. In fact, just last weekend ABC released a poll that drew huge media attention on the Sunday talk show circuit as it showed Hillary opening up a 12-point national lead. Now, just a few days later, that exact same poll shows only a 5-point lead. That data seemingly proves one of two things, either the polls are indeed "rigged" to show a desired outcome or the daily drip of WikiLeaks emails is finally starting to take a toll on the Clinton campaign.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n » But the ABC poll isn’t the only one tightening with most of the recent polls from the Real Clear Politics<\/a> average showing only a modest lead for Hillary<\/em>. […]<\/p>\n<\/p>\n » As The Hill<\/a> points out, the damage from the daily barrage of WikiLeaks dumps may be finally starting to take their toll on voters<\/em>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n » \u00ab\u00a0Hillary Clinton has failed to effectively contain the damage<\/em><\/strong> from the release of thousands of campaign chairman John Podesta’s personal emails, giving new ammunition to Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump. The fallout from the daily releases have raised concerns among Democrats that even if Clinton is elected president, the controversy will follow her into the White House<\/strong><\/em>.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n » \u00ab\u00a0Anyone with an Internet connection can dig into the thousands of pages of emails<\/em><\/strong>, which have revealed infighting among Clinton’s top advisers, as well as new details about the millions of dollars flowing into the Clinton’s charitable foundation and personal bank accounts. Meanwhile, the mainstream press, after seemingly concluding that this race is a done deal, has finally decided they can no longer ignore the Clinton scandals.\u00a0\u00bb <\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n » CNN’s Jake Tapper called the Wikileaks revelation around Brazile \u00ab\u00a0horrifying.\u00a0\u00bb \u00ab\u00a0Let me go to bottom line: There is no way under any circumstance the Clinton Foundation should not be operating if she becomes president," Chuck Todd,<\/em><\/strong> moderator of NBC’s Meet the Press, told WGN Radio in Chicago on Thursday. \u00ab\u00a0I just don’t see how they can keep that going. \u00ab\u00a0She’s got an opportunity, again, if she doesn’t do half measures here, if they shut it down to at least limit the political damage,\u00a0\u00bb he said.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n » Even Chris Matthews, who famously got the \u00ab\u00a0thrill up his leg\u00a0\u00bb listening to Obama speak back in 2008, admits that the \u00ab\u00a0thrill is gone\u00a0\u00bb with Hillary who will bring in \u00ab\u00a0train loads of contributors\u00a0\u00bb and \u00ab\u00a0charge them by the hour\u00a0\u00bb to sit in the Lincoln bedroom.<\/strong><\/em> »<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Mis en ligne le 28 octobre 2016 \u00e0 18H57<\/p>\n<\/p>\n … L\u00e0-dessus vient la nouvelle<\/a> que le FBI rouvre son enqu\u00eate emailgate<\/em>, sur les emails priv\u00e9s de la Secr\u00e9taire d’Etat Clinton. Dure journ\u00e9e<\/strong>. (Selon Infowars.com<\/em><\/a>.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n « The FBI on Friday announced it is reopening their investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server, another shocking October surprise for the Democrat candidate days from the presidential election<\/em>.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n » In a letter to committees and lawmakers relevant to the matter, FBI Director James Comey cited \u00ab\u00a0recent developments\u00a0\u00bb for the bureau’s decision to look into new emails which may contain classified information and how they may relate to its previous investigation. \u00ab\u00a0In previous congressional testimony, I referred to the fact that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) had completed its investigation of former Secretary Clinton’s personal email server. Due to recent developments, I am writing to supplement my previous testimony,\u00a0\u00bb Comey wrote in the letter obtained by CNBC<\/a><\/em>. »<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Mis en ligne le 28 octobre 2016 \u00e0 20H16<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Une certaine \u00ab\u00a0panique-Clinton\u00a0\u00bb… Hillary est-elle vraiment trop pourrie pour \u00eatre \u00e9lue ? Vaste question… Les livraisons r\u00e9guli\u00e8res de WikiLeaks commencent \u00e0 faire beaucoup, beaucoup de d\u00e9g\u00e2ts. M\u00eame les sondages les mieux ajust\u00e9s \u00e0 l’avenir assur\u00e9 d’Hillary Clinton battent de l’aile … M\u00eame CNN commence \u00e0 grogner ; etc. Partout, Trump remonte (ou bien dira-t-on qu’Hillary… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[934,3858,8546,4925,12538],"class_list":["post-76866","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-breves-de-crise","tag-clinton","tag-corruption","tag-foundation","tag-scandales","tag-usa-2016"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76866","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=76866"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76866\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=76866"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=76866"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=76866"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}\n
Mise \u00e0 jour : le FBI et emailgate<\/em> de nouveau en sc\u00e8ne<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n