Il nous a sembl\u00e9 opportun de reprendre l’interview du professeur en \u00e9conomie politique (au St Mary’s College<\/em>, en Californie) Jack Rasmus, sur RT, datant d’hier 7 novembre. Le principal sujet de l’interview est la derni\u00e8re intervention du directeur du FBI, James Comey, le 6 novembre ; selon Rasmus, il s’agit bien plus d’une derni\u00e8re manœuvre d’un homme qui est plut\u00f4t aux abois, pris entre plusieurs forces qu’il voudrait contenter et qui tente de tirer son \u00e9pingle du jeu dans des circonstances de pression extraordinaires, si caract\u00e9ristiques de cette \u00e9lection USA-2016. Son jugement est s\u00e9v\u00e8re pour le directeur du FBI, et son impression \u00e9tait hier que cette derni\u00e8re intervention n’a pas dû avoir un grand effet sur le cours de la campagne dans ses deux derniers jours.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n D’une fa\u00e7on plus g\u00e9n\u00e9rale, Rasmus d\u00e9crit un establishment<\/em>, – dans ce cas les services de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 nationale int\u00e9rieure, le FBI et d’autres services et organismes de police, – extr\u00eamement divis\u00e9 par les conditions chaotiques et furieuses de la campagne<\/strong>. Son avis nous paraît int\u00e9ressant en lui-m\u00eame, autant que la qualit\u00e9 de l’intervenant, ce professeur d’\u00e9conomie politique qui est un auteur \u00e0 succ\u00e8s et une r\u00e9f\u00e9rence tr\u00e8s respect\u00e9e, de sensibilit\u00e9 plut\u00f4t progressiste mais sans esprit partisan du point de vue de la politique courante et clairement d’une tendance dissidente qui le placerait tr\u00e8s proche du courant antiSyst\u00e8me qui nous importe. (Rasmus dispose d’un site propre, KiklosProduction.com<\/a>, où il propose ses diverses productions, ses nombreux ouvrages, ses articles, ses conf\u00e9rences, etc.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Voici donc l’interview de RT, le 7 novembre<\/a> :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n RT<\/em><\/strong>: « Comey threw the Clinton campaign into turmoil just over a week ago and now, on the eve of the election, he seems to be exonerating her. What do you make of the timing?<\/em> »<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Jack Rasmus<\/em><\/strong>: « To understand this whole affair with the FBI, starting in July, when FBI director Comey came out and pretty much gave a clearance to Clinton, you have to understand that the police establishment in the US is strongly pro-Trump. That is true within the FBI itself. And when Comey came out in July pretty much exonerating Clinton – it resulted in an internal firestorm within the FBI. And then Comey is caught in between both political wings of the establishment who are going after each other like never before. So, he came out with the statement about 10 days ago trying to balance the FBI’s initial position. He obviously thought that the statement was worded cautiously and would not cause another firestorm – but it did. It has affected the Clinton campaign. So, now he is coming out once again and he is clearing the decks for Clinton. What it reflects is a real split within the political establishment and that is reflected within the national security organizations and the police departments and so forth. Comey is trying to cover himself in both directions internally and between the two elites, but he is not doing a very good job<\/em>. »<\/p>\n<\/p>\n RT<\/em><\/strong>: « What reaction do you expect from Hillary Clinton now?<\/em> »<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Jack Rasmus<\/em><\/strong>: « So close to election, she may not really say that much herself directly and just let her campaign people make a blunt statement. I don’t think she wants to raise the issue at all. She probably wants to let the statement and the media speak for itself on that. I don’t think that is going to have too much effect on the election at this late day one way or the other…But the damage has been done to her campaign already and it doesn’t really matter that Comey at the very last minute sort of backtracks on it<\/em>. »<\/p>\n<\/p>\n RT<\/em><\/strong>: « Huma Abedin is becoming a key player in the scandal. The emails relating to Clinton were found on a laptop belonging to her ex-husband. She is Clinton’s right-hand woman and a close family friend. Born in the US, Huma but spent her childhood in Saudi Arabia. She served as a consultant to the Clinton Foundation and worked with Hillary Clinton for almost 20 years. She also worked at the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs, which some media have accused of links to extremist organizations. Do you think that if Clinton wins people will continue to scrutinize her? <\/em>»<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Jack Rasmus<\/em><\/strong>: « I think after this election in which we thought we saw instability going on and some remarkable conflicts between the two parties and they carried this before the election, I think this is going to continue after the election as well. If Trump loses, I don’t think he is going to expect it. And if Hillary wins, I think the Democrats are going to go after Trump and to attack his economic interests as a way to try and to get him to be quiet and not protest the elections. I think we got a lot of instability coming after the elections<\/strong><\/em>… »<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Nous ajoutons une autre pi\u00e8ce \u00e0 ce rapide inventaire, venue de Howard Kunstler qui est bien connu pour son esprit ind\u00e9pendant, son humeur caustique et pourtant roborative, sa plume bondissante et qui n’h\u00e9site pas devant la pol\u00e9mique, son m\u00e9pris complet pour la politique aux USA et pour le fonctionnement du syst\u00e8me de l’am\u00e9ricanisme, qu’il estime compl\u00e8tement corrompu et extr\u00eamement d\u00e9plorable (The Deplorable<\/a><\/em>, ce sont eux). En un sens, Kunstler se fiche bien du r\u00e9sultat de l’\u00e9lection, sinon qu’il affirme avec une certaine exultation que, de toutes les fa\u00e7ons et quel que soit le r\u00e9sultat, l’establishment<\/em> aura son \u00ab\u00a0va te faire foutre\u00a0\u00bb de la part de l’\u00e9lecteur (« The establishment will get its \u00ab\u00a0fuck you\u00a0\u00bb anyway <\/em>»). Tout juste estime-t-il qu’avec Clinton ce serait mieux, car l’on irait beaucoup plus vite dans le d\u00e9sastre et l’effondrement avec les vrais acteurs et producteurs de ce d\u00e9satre et de cet effondrement aux commandes et affichant ainsi leur responsabilit\u00e9<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Son avis d’observateur ind\u00e9pendant est n\u00e9anmoins plus d\u00e9taill\u00e9 sur les candidats ; concernant Clinton, c’est la pourriture absolue ; concernant Trump, il regrette que le candidat ait \u00e9t\u00e9 si mauvais dans son comportement et son argumentation, alors qu’il portait \u00e9videmment ce courant de contestation de type antiSyst\u00e8me si puissant et si profond, un tel courant qui aurait m\u00e9rit\u00e9 un porte-drapeau plus glorieux… Pour l’avenir, cet avenir qui n’est pas si loin puisqu’il commence demain matin, Kunstler est r\u00e9solument et all\u00e8grement pessimiste<\/strong>. Il d\u00e9taille les possibilit\u00e9s de blocage et d’affrontement d\u00e8s ce soir, ou demain au petit matin ; \u00e0 plus long terme, il nous pr\u00e9sente un menu explosif agr\u00e9ment\u00e9 d’alternatives pleines de fougue : un vrai pseudo-nazi pour succ\u00e9der \u00e0 Trump et prendre en main le mouvement, une guerre civile, une guerre g\u00e9n\u00e9ralis\u00e9e et ainsi de suite… \u00ab\u00a0Que du bonheur\u00a0\u00bb, comme on dit selon le vocabulaire publicitaire postmoderne, si compl\u00e8tement de circonstance dans une \u00e9poque dont la philosophie ontologique est l’inversion en toutes choses<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n La derni\u00e8re phrase de Kunstler, sur son vote : « Moi ? J’ai l’intention d’\u00e9crire mon propre vote, pour Homey D. Clown<\/a>, parce qu’il n’emmerde personne<\/em>. » Article du 7 novembre \u00e0 lire sur son site Kunstler.com<\/a><\/em>, ou bien repris sur ZeroHedge.com<\/a><\/em>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n « A mighty nausea wells up across the land as the awful day cometh. Who will receive the black spot of fate on Tuesday? I wouldn’t want to be him or her on that dreadful day. The flagship of Modernity has lost its vaunted mojo and nobody knows what to do about it as the USS-USA pitches and yaws into the maelstrom.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n » Much opinion \u00ab\u00a0out there\u00a0\u00bb contends that we will have to suffer an election overtime, with the results contested on every hill and molehill from sea to shining sea. That scenario suggests various outcomes, all of them pretty bad:<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n » 1) the election is once again relegated to a Supreme Court case, only this time it ends up a 4-4 tie. Constitutional crisis time.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n » 2) Perhaps as a function of No. 1, it ends up in the US House of Representatives. The catch is: members aren’t limited to Trump or HRC. They can vote for whoever they like.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n » 3) A lot of web chatter has President Obama invoking some sort of emergency with the election postponed until some conclave of political viziers can figure a way out of it. Unlikely, but possible.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n » FBI Director James Comey’s eleventh hour reprieve of Hillary in the email server case sent an odor of rotting carp wafting across the political landscape. Like, his peeps actually vetted 650,000 emails in a week? I’m sure. Of course, the FBI does not issue indictments; that’s AG Loretta Lynch’s job over at the Department of Justice. The FBI only makes criminal referrals to such. But this puts too fine a point on the matter because the much more serious issue is the Clinton Foundation case, and the arrant sale of influence while HRC ran the State Department.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n » That currently overshadowed case is not closed. It sends up the odor not of a single rotting carp but of an entire whale pod dead on the beach. Half the emirs in Arabia dropped millions on the foundation to facilitate arms deals or to influence policy at State, and that was only part of what looks exactly like a classic racketeering operation. The Clinton Foundation story is not going away anytime soon and it will suck all the air out of the public arena for as far ahead as anyone can see when Hillary is in the oval office<\/em>. […]<\/p>\n<\/p>\n » The establishment will get its \u00ab\u00a0fuck you\u00a0\u00bb anyway. I do go along with the argument advanced by others that it would probably be better for Hillary to win, because that way the right people (the gang already in power) will be blamed for the descent into the maelstrom and will be expeditiously swept away.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n » Just about anything may rise up across America after that — the true corn-pone Nazi who succeeds Trump in the meshuggeneh branch of conservative politics… a second civil war… or a World Made By Hand. I detect a general awareness that the country must pass through some epic ordeal to straighten itself out. Well, here it is, just in time or the holidays<\/em>. »<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Ainsi, que ce soit dans le ton s\u00e9rieux et mesur\u00e9, ou dans celui de la raillerie furieuse, l’\u00e9tat d’esprit est le m\u00eame. C’est celui, mais inverti, de cet officier de l’US Navy qui contemplait le spectacle de la Flotte du Pacifique le 7 d\u00e9cembre 1941, en fin d’apr\u00e8s-midi \u00e0 Pearl-Harbor : \u00ab\u00a0Je sais bien que nous allons gagner cette putain de guerre, mais je me demande bien comment\u00a0\u00bb, – quelque chose comme : \u00ab\u00a0Je sais bien que nous allons couler ce putain de pays, mais je me demande bien comment\u00a0\u00bb. Qu’on se rassure, nous-m\u00eames et nos lecteurs : ce sera beaucoup, beaucoup plus rapide que la victoire dans le Pacifique<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Effectivement, la question qui est dans tous les esprits est bien le \u00ab\u00a0comment\u00a0\u00bb, – plus question de \u00ab\u00a0si\u00a0\u00bb et m\u00eame le \u00ab\u00a0quand\u00a0\u00bb devient superflu, – le \u00ab\u00a0comment\u00a0\u00bb de la chute des États-Unis d’Am\u00e9rique, par l’int\u00e9rieur, en toute ind\u00e9pendance et surtout en toute libert\u00e9 comme le recommande le Commandement unique de la Vertu de l’exceptionnel ; comme l’avait recommand\u00e9 le tr\u00e8s-grand Lincoln, alors tout jeune parlementaire et d\u00e9j\u00e0 conscient du destin qui ferait de lui un des architectes de sa sinistre proph\u00e9tie puisque, d\u00e9cid\u00e9ment, un seul terme du dilemme qu’il pr\u00e9sente, et un seul seulement, doit \u00eatre retenu<\/strong> : « Si la destruction devait un jour nous atteindre, nous devrions en \u00eatre nous-m\u00eames les premiers et les ultimes artisans. En tant que nation d’hommes libres, nous devons \u00e9ternellement survivre, ou mourir en nous suicidant<\/em>. » La derni\u00e8re fois que nous avons fait cette citation, qui nous revient souvent sous la plume, c’est dans le cours de Notes d’Analyse<\/em> du 12 septembre 2016<\/a>, sous le titre dont ne retirons pas une seule virgule (il n’en comporte d’ailleurs pas car c’est bien inutile), – « Notes sur une campagne devenue folle<\/em> ».<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Certes, le mot g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de \u00ab\u00a0folie\u00a0\u00bb est l\u00e0, dans notre esprit incr\u00e9dule, sous nos yeux \u00e9bahis, et au bout de notre plume interdite \u00e0 chaque fois qu’il s’agit d’en parler, mais le temps d’un court instant car ce spectacle de la Chute doit \u00eatre absolument d\u00e9crit et act\u00e9. La \u00ab\u00a0folie suicidaire\u00a0\u00bb des USA qui a conduit \u00e0 l’apoth\u00e9ose de cette campagne, et qui entend bien poursuivre jusqu’\u00e0 son terme, doit \u00e9videmment inspirer, pour les temps \u00e0 venir, le jugement de l’historien qui, au-del\u00e0 des USA, devra embrasser une \u00e9poque, l’\u00e9poque du Syst\u00e8me, l’\u00e9poque du Diable<\/strong> qu’ils se permettent en plus d’aller c\u00e9l\u00e9brer<\/a> avec leur vulgarit\u00e9 extr\u00eame et leur goût du bling-bling sanglant, comme pour se faire croire qu’ils ont un petit peu du tragique de leur trag\u00e9die-bouffe<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/p>\n Mis en ligne le 8 novembre 2016 \u00e0 06H50<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Ultimes r\u00e9flexions avant inventaire pour liquidation Il nous a sembl\u00e9 opportun de reprendre l’interview du professeur en \u00e9conomie politique (au St Mary’s College, en Californie) Jack Rasmus, sur RT, datant d’hier 7 novembre. Le principal sujet de l’interview est la derni\u00e8re intervention du directeur du FBI, James Comey, le 6 novembre ; selon Rasmus, il… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3482,5932,2803,4020,10714,2801,3896,17899,5491,12538],"class_list":["post-76890","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-chute","tag-diable","tag-effondrement","tag-folie","tag-jack","tag-kunstler","tag-lincoln","tag-rasmus","tag-suicide","tag-usa-2016"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76890","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=76890"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76890\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=76890"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=76890"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=76890"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}\n
\n