{"id":76951,"date":"2016-12-04T06:52:05","date_gmt":"2016-12-04T06:52:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2016\/12\/04\/wapo-contre-the-donald\/"},"modified":"2016-12-04T06:52:05","modified_gmt":"2016-12-04T06:52:05","slug":"wapo-contre-the-donald","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2016\/12\/04\/wapo-contre-the-donald\/","title":{"rendered":"WaPo contre The-Donald<\/em>"},"content":{"rendered":"

WaPo contre The-Donald<\/em><\/h2>\n<\/p>\n

Un ph\u00e9nom\u00e8ne remarquable est l’hostilit\u00e9 persistante et d’une force extraordinaire de la presse-Syst\u00e8me US, y compris et surtout la plus prestigieuse, contre Trump, d\u00e9sormais President-elect<\/em>. C’est un signe remarquable et significatif de la situation compl\u00e8tement inhabituelle<\/strong> r\u00e9gant \u00e0 Washington.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Aucun pr\u00e9sident n’a jamais subi ce traitement, et de tr\u00e8s loin<\/strong> (y compris Nixon, que la presse ha\u00efssait et qui ha\u00efssait la presse). Depuis la fin de la Guerre froide particuli\u00e8rement, l’habitude extr\u00eamement z\u00e9l\u00e9e et empress\u00e9e<\/strong> est un ralliement syst\u00e9matique des plus gros et prestigieux bataillons de la presse-Syst\u00e8me au pouvoir en place, et, aussi vite dans les p\u00e9riodes interm\u00e9diaires, au pouvoir qui se met en place, quelle que soit sa pseudo-tendance politique<\/strong>, – Bush-p\u00e8re, Clinton, Bush-fils, Obama. Avec Trump l’hostilit\u00e9 demeure, s’installe, voire s’amplifie encore dans certains cas<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Un cas extraordinaire \u00e0 cet \u00e9gard est le Washington Post<\/em> (WaPo), ce qui conduira \u00e0 quelques r\u00e9flexions d’une m\u00e9moire ironique (apr\u00e8s tout, WaPo est le fleuron glorieux de la gloire du Watergate<\/a>, et le Watergate est le fleuron glorieux de la justesse du r\u00e9gime comme chacun sait, et dans tous les cas a int\u00e9r\u00eat \u00e0 savoir). On a d\u00e9j\u00e0 vu un exemple du comportement du WaPo (d\u00e9lation type-\u00ab\u00a0blacklist<\/em>\u00ab\u00a0<\/a> de ce qu’il ne faut pas lire et qu’il faudrait liquider), \u00e0 c\u00f4t\u00e9 duquel le Jo McCarthy des ann\u00e9es 1950 fait figure d’amateur qui se sut jamais \u00eatre \u00e0 la mesure de la r\u00e9putation qu’on lui fit. Wapo, c’est diff\u00e9rent, il s’agit de v\u00e9ritables professionnels ; The Daily Caller<\/em> du 3 d\u00e9cembre<\/a>, sous la plume de Rachel Stoltoof, confirme le jugement et l’illustre d’un floril\u00e8ge extraordinaire des manchettes de WaPo durant deux jours ordinaires<\/strong> de l’ouverture-interregnum<\/em> de la pr\u00e9sidence Trump, lundi et mardi derniers.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

« The Washington Post is still in meltdown mode, more than three weeks after Donald Trump won the presidency. The paper began churning out dramatic headlines about President-elect Trump immediately following the election. \u00ab\u00a0Markets plunge worldwide as Trump surges to the White House,\u00a0\u00bb a headline in the Markets section blared Nov. 9. And in Style: \u00ab\u00a0A call to action for reporters covering Donald Trump.\u00a0\u00bb \u00ab\u00a0Trump voters will not like what happens next,\u00a0\u00bb an opinion writer wrote. And the next day: \u00ab\u00a0Vigils and protests swell across U.S. in wake of Trump victory.\u00a0\u00bb<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

» By no means losing steam the following week, WaPo kept the over the top stories coming. \u00ab\u00a0Welcome to the Trump kleptocracy,\u00a0\u00bb one headline read. \u00ab\u00a0If you voted for Trump because he’s ‘anti-establishment,’ guess what: You got conned,\u00a0\u00bb read another. And from the Wonkblog: \u00ab\u00a0Donald Trump and the end of history.\u00a0\u00bb In just one brief period between Monday and Tuesday, WaPo ran the following headlines:<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

» • \u00ab\u00a0‘We’ve never had anything like this’: Racist, threatening message left on door of black church.\u00a0\u00bb<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

» • \u00ab\u00a0Donald Trump’s political mandate is historically small.\u00a0\u00bb<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

» • \u00ab\u00a0House Democrats demand Chaffetz probe Trump’s finances.\u00a0\u00bb<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

» • \u00ab\u00a0Trump’s ‘news’ source: Alien lizards, fluoride mind control and voter fraud.\u00a0\u00bb<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

» • \u00ab\u00a0Why we can’t — and shouldn’t — ignore Donald Trump’s tweets.\u00a0\u00bb<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

» • \u00ab\u00a0In one tweet, Trump trashes two constitutional amendments .\u00a0\u00bb<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

» • \u00ab\u00a0Donald Trump and social media have weaponized the conspiracy theory in American politics.\u00a0\u00bb<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

» • \u00ab\u00a0Trump just scored perhaps the biggest victory of his new tenure. But it comes with a huge asterisk.\u00a0\u00bb<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

» • \u00ab\u00a0AP FACT CHECK: Trump won presidency but lost popular vote.\u00a0\u00bb<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

» • \u00ab\u00a0Donald Trump is never going to change. Not ever.\u00a0\u00bb<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

» • \u00ab\u00a0Trump’s populism is about to face a rude awakening.\u00a0\u00bb<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

» • \u00ab\u00a0Trump has already defeated the news media. And it’s unclear what we can do about it.\u00a0\u00bb<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

» Basically, there’s no end in sight to this glorious meltdown<\/em>. »<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Mis en ligne le 4 d\u00e9cembre 2016 \u00e0 06H51<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

WaPo contre The-Donald Un ph\u00e9nom\u00e8ne remarquable est l’hostilit\u00e9 persistante et d’une force extraordinaire de la presse-Syst\u00e8me US, y compris et surtout la plus prestigieuse, contre Trump, d\u00e9sormais President-elect. C’est un signe remarquable et significatif de la situation compl\u00e8tement inhabituelle r\u00e9gant \u00e0 Washington. Aucun pr\u00e9sident n’a jamais subi ce traitement, et de tr\u00e8s loin (y compris… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[3505,3430,2639,12520,3248],"class_list":["post-76951","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-breves-de-crise","tag-mccarthy","tag-post","tag-trump","tag-wapo","tag-washington"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76951","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=76951"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76951\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=76951"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=76951"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=76951"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}