{"id":77039,"date":"2017-01-19T06:50:31","date_gmt":"2017-01-19T06:50:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2017\/01\/19\/gabbard-a-damas-comme-envoyee-de-trump\/"},"modified":"2017-01-19T06:50:31","modified_gmt":"2017-01-19T06:50:31","slug":"gabbard-a-damas-comme-envoyee-de-trump","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2017\/01\/19\/gabbard-a-damas-comme-envoyee-de-trump\/","title":{"rendered":"Gabbard \u00e0 Damas\u00a0: comme envoy\u00e9e de Trump\u00a0?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><h2 class=\"titleset_b.deepblue\" style=\"color:#0f3955; font-size:1.65em; font-variant:small-caps\">Gabbard \u00e0 Damas : comme envoy\u00e9e de Trump ?<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>La d\u00e9put\u00e9e d\u00e9mocrate de gauche Tulsi Gabbard, dont la position originale est largement <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article\/notes-sur-un-mai-68-cosmique-a-washington-dc-1\">document\u00e9e<\/a> sur notre site, s&rsquo;est d\u00e9plac\u00e9e en Syrie cette semaine (il n&rsquo;est pas pr\u00e9cis\u00e9 si elle est de retour \u00e0 Washington) pour une discr\u00e8te mais semble-t-il importante visite. Les d\u00e9tails de cette visite sont pour l&rsquo;instant gard\u00e9s secrets, pour ne pas provoquer de pol\u00e9miques public avant l&rsquo;inauguration de Trump. <strong>Il est simplement dit que Gabbard a pass\u00e9 un temps consid\u00e9rable \u00e0 Damas, \u00e0 rencontrer diverses personnalit\u00e9s ; si Assad n&rsquo;est pas mentionn\u00e9, il est hautement probable que Gabbard l&rsquo;a rencontr\u00e9<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>Dans ces conditions, et consid\u00e9rant que les pourparlers de paix sur la Syrie sous auspice Russie-Turquie-Iran commencent lundi \u00e0 Astana, au Kazakhstan, avec \u00ab\u00a0invitation\u00a0\u00bb adress\u00e9e aux USA de suivre ces n\u00e9gociations, il est hautement probable que le voyage de Gabbard a un caract\u00e8re officiel pour l&rsquo;instant dissimul\u00e9. L&rsquo;hypoth\u00e8se que fait Jason Ditz, de <em>Antiwar.com<\/em>, est que Gabbard intervient avec le soutien de Trump, quasiment comme envoy\u00e9e sp\u00e9ciale sinon comme n\u00e9gociatrice de l&rsquo;administration Trump par rapport \u00e0 la rencontre d&rsquo;Astana. Cela pourrait annoncer que Gabbard pourrait tenir un r\u00f4le diplomatique important pour l&rsquo;administration Trump dans la crise syrienne&#8230; Cela montrerait aussi qu&rsquo;il y a une <strong>r\u00e9elle coordination<\/strong> entre Moscou et Washington-Trump dans cette crise, et <strong>le choix du 23 janvier pour la r\u00e9union d&rsquo;Astana, deux jours apr\u00e8s l&rsquo;inauguration de Trump, aurait une r\u00e9elle signification<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>Pour nous, cette intervention de Gabbard, aussi bien en raison de la personnalit\u00e9 que de l&rsquo;activit\u00e9 de la jeune d\u00e9put\u00e9e d\u00e9mocrate, est sans aucun doute un signe tr\u00e8s important en fonction des \u00e9v\u00e9nements en cours dans la p\u00e9riode. Gabbard <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article\/gabbard-avec-trump-contre-les-neocons\">a rencontr\u00e9 Trump<\/a> apr\u00e8s son \u00e9lection. Il avait alors \u00e9t\u00e9 question d&rsquo;un poste qui pourrait lui \u00eatre offert dans la nouvelle administration. Ce voyage en Syrie <strong>semble confirmer cette possibilit\u00e9, tout en offrant une indication extr\u00eamement importante<\/strong> pour l&rsquo;hypoth\u00e8se de la volont\u00e9 de Trump de changer compl\u00e8tement la politique des USA en Syrie, dans le sens d&rsquo;un rapprochement des positions d&rsquo;Assad et russo-iraniennes, et d&rsquo;une lutte claire et affirm\u00e9e contre <em>Daesh<\/em> et les divers terrorismes islamistes.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>Ci-dessous, des extraits du texte de Ditz, <a href=\"http:\/\/news.antiwar.com\/2017\/01\/18\/rep-gabbard-visits-damascus-on-unannounced-syria-trip\/\">le 19 janvier<\/a>&#8230; &laquo; <em>Gabbard&rsquo;s office, citing security, says a lot of the details of the trip are not going to be revealed until she has returned to the United States, and they declined to say if she had met directly with President Bashar al-Assad, though they did confirm she&rsquo;d met with several government leaders while in Damascus.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>&raquo; <em>With considerable foreign policy similarities between the two, Gabbard has met with President-elect Donald Trump since the election, and was rumored to be under consideration for important cabinet positions. It is entirely possible then that she made the visit as a de facto Trump Administration negotiator. That they specifically declined to say if Rep. Gabbard met with Assad is tantamount to an admission that she did, and indeed it&rsquo;s hard to imagine she would visit Damascus with an eye toward talking peace without meeting with the Syrian president.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>&raquo; <em>It&rsquo;s more likely that the denial is intended to prevent any specific official debate around the visit until Friday&rsquo;s inauguration,  and that this represents an attempt by the Trump Administration to covertly get out in front of the upcoming Syrian peace talks, which begin Monday in Astana, Kazakhstan. Trump has already been very public in faulting the existing US policy in Syria, and has talked about scrapping efforts to arm the various rebel factions. Gabbard has long criticized the CIA arms smuggling venture, and could easily be laying the groundwork for a quick policy shift in the days to come<\/em>. &raquo;<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>Mis en ligne le 19 janvier 2017 \u00e0 06H46<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gabbard \u00e0 Damas : comme envoy\u00e9e de Trump ? La d\u00e9put\u00e9e d\u00e9mocrate de gauche Tulsi Gabbard, dont la position originale est largement document\u00e9e sur notre site, s&rsquo;est d\u00e9plac\u00e9e en Syrie cette semaine (il n&rsquo;est pas pr\u00e9cis\u00e9 si elle est de retour \u00e0 Washington) pour une discr\u00e8te mais semble-t-il importante visite. Les d\u00e9tails de cette visite&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[12690,12206,12689,2697,6157,3867,2639,2832],"class_list":["post-77039","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-breves-de-crise","tag-astana","tag-damas","tag-envoyee","tag-negociations","tag-paix","tag-syrie","tag-trump","tag-tulsi"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77039","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=77039"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77039\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=77039"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=77039"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=77039"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}