La presse antiSyst\u00e8me avec le relais de quelques m\u00e9dias de la presseSyst\u00e8me, notamment FoxNews<\/em>, assurent d\u00e9sormais une diffusion remarquable de nouvelles du genre dit-FakeNews <\/em>(\u00ab\u00a0nouvelles vraies mais interdites\u00a0\u00bb en novlangue postmoderne). On le constate avec cette interview<\/a> du s\u00e9nateur r\u00e9publicain Rand Paul, en quasi-dissidence du Syst\u00e8me avec sa complice Tulsi Gabbard<\/a>, assurant que l’affirmation du pr\u00e9sident Trump selon laquelle sa campagne USA-2017 a \u00e9t\u00e9 l’objet d’une surveillance t\u00e9l\u00e9phonique et \u00e9lectronique est fond\u00e9e<\/strong>. (Hypoth\u00e8se Watergate 2.0<\/a>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Cette affirmation vient un jour apr\u00e8s la r\u00e9ponse du directeur du FBI Comey devant le Congr\u00e8s selon laquelle lui-m\u00eame n’a pas d'\u00a0\u00bbinformation disponible\u00a0\u00bb sur de telles \u00e9coutes, mais donnant ensuite diverses pr\u00e9cisions montrant que son affirmation n’implique en aucun cas que le pr\u00e9sident Obama, et certains des dirigeants et hauts fonctionnaires de son administration, n’aient pas eu de connaissance ou d’activit\u00e9s dans ce sens durant la campagne<\/strong>. Les r\u00e9ponses de Comey<\/a> sont extr\u00eamement calibr\u00e9es pour ne mettre personne en cause uniquement selon sa seule connaissance, tout en laissant la porte ouverte \u00e0 diverses possibilit\u00e9s. (Les r\u00e9ponses de Comey, comme on commence \u00e0 le voir avec ce personnage, sont surtout calibr\u00e9es pour ne jamais prendre le risque d’\u00eatre lui-m\u00eame pris en d\u00e9faut par rapport \u00e0 ses pr\u00e9rogatives qui n’embrassent pas l’activit\u00e9 d’autres services et d’autres personnalit\u00e9s.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n …D’où la rectitude de l’intervention de Rand Paul, qui ne cache pas sa conviction qu’effectivement la campagne Trump a \u00e9t\u00e9 espionn\u00e9e<\/strong> par tel ou tel moyen, telle ou telle faction de l’administration Trump ; et il n’existe aucune raison de croire que cette situation ne se poursuive pas \u00e9ventuellement, ce que Trump n’ignore certainement pas<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n « \u00ab\u00a0Everybody admits that somebody spied on Mike Flynn, and he was part of the Trump campaign,\u00a0\u00bb Paul said. \u00ab\u00a0It sounds like what the president said has already been proven to be true<\/strong>.\u00a0\u00bb<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n » He said that the media is confused, because they think that wiretapping means placing an \u00ab\u00a0old-fashioned bug\u00a0\u00bb on someone’s telephone. \u00ab\u00a0If you haven’t looked recently, most of our telephones don’t have wires,\u00a0\u00bb Paul said. \u00ab\u00a0‘Wiretapping’ is a broad term for surveillance.\u00a0\u00bb<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n » [FoxNews’<\/em>] Cavuto said that surveilling Flynn is one thing, but he pressed Paul if Trump himself was tapped. \u00ab\u00a0I think ‘wiretapping’ to Donald Trump probably meant spying. And I think ‘Donald Trump’ or the ‘campaign’ also probably meant Mike Flynn,\u00a0\u00bb Paul said. \u00ab\u00a0So I think really we’re arguing circles around something that most people are admitting.\u00a0\u00bb \u00ab\u00a0Somebody was spying on the Trump campaign<\/strong> and … Mike Flynn lost his job because of an illegal felony in which somebody released the results of spying on the Trump campaign.\u00a0\u00bb<\/em> »<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Mis en ligne le 21 mars 2017 \u00e0 16H54<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Rand Paul et le Watergate-2.0 anti-Trump La presse antiSyst\u00e8me avec le relais de quelques m\u00e9dias de la presseSyst\u00e8me, notamment FoxNews, assurent d\u00e9sormais une diffusion remarquable de nouvelles du genre dit-FakeNews (\u00ab\u00a0nouvelles vraies mais interdites\u00a0\u00bb en novlangue postmoderne). On le constate avec cette interview du s\u00e9nateur r\u00e9publicain Rand Paul, en quasi-dissidence du Syst\u00e8me avec sa complice… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[2839,3285,4915,2926,12849,2639,2626],"class_list":["post-77156","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-breves-de-crise","tag-comey","tag-congres","tag-ecoutes","tag-flynn","tag-telephoniques","tag-trump","tag-watergate"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77156","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=77156"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77156\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=77156"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=77156"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=77156"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}