{"id":77277,"date":"2017-11-01T10:07:40","date_gmt":"2017-11-01T10:07:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2017\/11\/01\/un-effondrement-en-quete-didentite\/"},"modified":"2017-11-01T10:07:40","modified_gmt":"2017-11-01T10:07:40","slug":"un-effondrement-en-quete-didentite","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2017\/11\/01\/un-effondrement-en-quete-didentite\/","title":{"rendered":"Un effondrement en qu\u00eate d&rsquo;identit\u00e9"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><h2 class=\"titleset_b.deepgreen\" style=\"color:#75714d; font-size:1.65em; font-variant:small-caps\">Un effondrement en qu\u00eate d&rsquo;identit\u00e9<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>Il ne manque pas de textes sur cet immense ph\u00e9nom\u00e8ne caract\u00e9risant nos Temps de temp\u00eate, que nous identifions comme l&rsquo;effondrement du Syst\u00e8me (GCES, pour Grande Crise de l&rsquo;Effondrement du Syst\u00e8me). Certains, bien entendu, sont plus significatifs, plus structur\u00e9s que d&rsquo;autres et renforcent la connaissance intuitive que nous pouvons avoir du ph\u00e9nom\u00e8ne. C&rsquo;est dans cette cat\u00e9gorie que nous mettons ce texte de Robert W. Merry, <em>editor <\/em>de l&rsquo;hebdomadaire de la droite pal\u00e9o-conservatrice (tendance Buchanan), <em>The American Conservative<\/em>, et texte paru dans <em>The Washington Times<\/em> du <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtontimes.com\/news\/2017\/oct\/31\/us-must-protect-its-sphere-of-influence\/\">31 octobre 2017<\/a>. Le titre exprime les pr\u00e9occupations de l&rsquo;auteur et nos propres sentiments : <em>L&rsquo;effondrement de l&rsquo;ordre du monde<\/em>. (<em>Crumbling <\/em>[<em>The crumbling of the global order<\/em>] veut aussi bien dire \u00ab\u00a0\u00e9miettement\u00a0\u00bb, \u00ab\u00a0effritement\u00a0\u00bb qu'\u00a0\u00bbeffondrement\u00a0\u00bb : finalement, l&rsquo;\u00e9miettement ou l&rsquo;effritement ne font que d\u00e9crire le mode de fonctionnement de ce qui est sans aucun doute un effondrement.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>La description du processus, son universalit\u00e9 extr\u00eame, sa diversit\u00e9 extraordinaire, c&rsquo;est-\u00e0-dire le fait que rien dans la g\u00e9ographie, dans la politique, dans les m&oelig;urs, dans la culture, et enfin dans la psychologie n&rsquo;est \u00e9pargn\u00e9 par le ph\u00e9nom\u00e8ne, tout cela ressort tr\u00e8s nettement de ce texte. C&rsquo;est \u00e9videmment la raison de notre choix \u00e0 cet \u00e9gard. Un passage, surtout, nous para&icirc;t int\u00e9ressant, en ce sens qu&rsquo;on peut lui appliquer une formule interrogative originale et qui soutient l&rsquo;essentiel de notre propre approche : quel est l&rsquo;identit\u00e9 de cet \u00e9v\u00e9nement de l&rsquo;effondrement, quel nom peut-on lui donner ? Partant de l&rsquo;\u00e9tiquette passe-partout et insignifiante de \u00ab\u00a0apr\u00e8s-Guerre froide\u00a0\u00bb, Merry observe :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>&laquo; &#8230; <em>Il est \u00e9vident que le statu quo est attaqu\u00e9 de tous les c\u00f4t\u00e9s. Cela sugg\u00e8re une explication du fait que l&rsquo;\u00e8re de l&rsquo;apr\u00e8s-Guerre froide n&rsquo;a pas de nom autre que celui qui indique qu&rsquo;elle vient chronologiquement apr\u00e8s la Guerre froide. Elle n&rsquo;a pas de nom indiquant son identit\u00e9 parce qu&rsquo;elle n&rsquo;a pas d&rsquo;identit\u00e9. Il s&rsquo;agit seulement d&rsquo;une p\u00e9riode d&rsquo;un chaos grandissant qui suit une \u00e9poque de stabilit\u00e9 et qui devrait mener, on peut l&rsquo;esp\u00e9rer, \u00e0 une autre \u00e9poque <\/em>[de stabilit\u00e9]<em>. Dans l&rsquo;intervalle, nous devons nous attendre \u00e0 toujours plus d&rsquo;instabilit\u00e9 et de difficult\u00e9 dans les affaires du monde<\/em>. &raquo;<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>Suit une description de l&rsquo;\u00e9chec complet des &Eacute;tats-Unis \u00e0 tenter de ma&icirc;triser et d&rsquo;orienter cette \u00e9poque selon un ordre qui serait \u00e0 leur convenance, et obtenant le r\u00e9sultat exactement inverse de l&rsquo;accroissement extraordinaire du chaos directement du fait de leur action ; et, au-del\u00e0, la suggestion appuy\u00e9e de l&rsquo;auteur pour un retrait des USA sur la zone g\u00e9ographique d&rsquo;influence dans un mouvement classique de n\u00e9o-isolationnisme qui sanctionnerait l&rsquo;absurdit\u00e9 de vouloir imposer au reste du monde un \u00ab\u00a0mod\u00e8le\u00a0\u00bb am\u00e9ricain qui n&rsquo;est plus accept\u00e9 et se r\u00e9v\u00e8le compl\u00e8tement inad\u00e9quat. Cette issue supposerait que le \u00ab\u00a0mod\u00e8le\u00a0\u00bb am\u00e9ricain, ramen\u00e9 aux origines, conviendrait encore aux USA, ce qui n&rsquo;est pas n\u00e9cessairement le cas. (Ce n&rsquo;est pas notre conception, certes, nous qui jugeons que le \u00ab\u00a0mod\u00e8le\u00a0\u00bb am\u00e9ricain n&rsquo;a jamais \u00e9t\u00e9 qu&rsquo;un simulacre de mod\u00e8le et aussi dommageable \u00e0 la population des USA que l&rsquo;\u00e9tait l&rsquo;URSS aux citoyens russes. Il faut tout de m\u00eame noter que la conviction implicite de Merry pour la durabilit\u00e9 du \u00ab\u00a0mod\u00e8le\u00a0\u00bb r\u00e9duit aux seuls USA et \u00e0 leur zone d&rsquo;influence est tr\u00e8s mod\u00e9r\u00e9e en fonction de l&rsquo;inconnue \u00e9crasante qu&rsquo;est cette crise g\u00e9n\u00e9rale.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>Du plus grand int\u00e9r\u00eat, par contre, est la prise en compte de plus en plus g\u00e9n\u00e9rale de cette question de l'\u00a0\u00bbidentit\u00e9 de la crise\u00a0\u00bb, qui retrouve des hypoth\u00e8ses telle que celle du \u00ab\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article\/le-tourbillon-crisique-regne\">tourbillon crisique<\/a>\u00ab\u00a0. Il s&rsquo;agit certes d&rsquo;un intervalle entre deux mondes, mais la puissance et la rapidit\u00e9 des \u00e9v\u00e9nements, autant que l&rsquo;incompr\u00e9hension et l&rsquo;impuissance totales de la raison humaine et des actes qu&rsquo;elle engendre devant ce ph\u00e9nom\u00e8ne, conduisent \u00e9videmment \u00e0 penser que l&rsquo;intervalle est bien un effondrement. L&rsquo;ancien monde ne sera pas transform\u00e9 dans le sens d&rsquo;\u00eatre r\u00e9form\u00e9, il sera, il devra \u00eatre d\u00e9truit, ou bien plus s&ucirc;rement il est effectivement en train d&rsquo;\u00eatre d\u00e9truit (de s&rsquo;autod\u00e9truire). Ainsi la remarque de Merry (cette \u00e9poque &laquo; <em>n&rsquo;a pas de nom indiquant son identit\u00e9 parce qu&rsquo;elle n&rsquo;a pas d&rsquo;identit\u00e9<\/em> &raquo;) va-t-elle bien plus loin que l\u00e0 o&ugrave; veut l&rsquo;amener le commentateur. Il s&rsquo;agit d&rsquo;une de ces expressions cr\u00e9\u00e9es pour d\u00e9crire une situation et qui, une fois \u00e9nonc\u00e9e, d\u00e9passe largement l&rsquo;intention qui a pr\u00e9sid\u00e9 \u00e0 sa formulation.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><h4><em>dde.org<\/em><\/h4>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>_____________________<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><h2 class=\"titleset_a.deepgreen\" style=\"color:#75714d; font-size:2em\">The crumbling of the global order<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>The bane of Spain is Catalonia, where many want to secede from the Spanish kingdom. Madrid doesn&rsquo;t want this to happen, which is why the Spanish Senate authorized the government to seize direct control of the rebellious northeastern region, which for decades has enjoyed considerable autonomy under the Spanish system. This action came after the Catalan Parliament, which has a bare separatist majority, approved a resolution to \u00ab\u00a0create a Catalan republic as an independent state.\u00a0\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>Thus has Spain entered what The New York Times calls the country&rsquo;s \u00ab\u00a0greatest constitutional crisis since it embraced democracy in 1978.\u00a0\u00bb That represents nearly four decades of relative democratic stability for a country that went through a horrendous civil war in the 1930s and then succumbed to nearly 40 years of dictatorial rule. And now, once again, prospects of bloodshed are real.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>The emergence of this new crisis after so many good years raises a question: Why now? The answer: These events are merely part of a broader global deterioration in the status quo. The world hasn&rsquo;t seen this kind of progressive decay in established structures since the chaos of 1914-1945. During that time, which followed nearly a century of relative global stability, the world seemed to come unglued &mdash; until a new global order was established through World War II and its aftermath, with America at its center.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>But now that global order seems itself to be coming unglued. Consider the acidic forces and sentiments roiling the globe in these times &mdash; sectarian animosities; nationalist sensibilities; passions of ethnic identity; geopolitical rivalries; migration urgencies; angers against globalism. Clearly, the status quo is under attack from many directions.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>This suggests there&rsquo;s a reason that the post-Cold War era doesn&rsquo;t have a name other than one that denotes it came after the Cold War. It doesn&rsquo;t have an identifying title because it doesn&rsquo;t have an identity. It is merely the period of increasing chaos that followed one era of stability and will lead, one can only hope, to another. In the meantime, we should brace for increasing instability and difficulty in global affairs.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>Some of the more powerful developments of this era of change are the rise of China and its apparent resolve to challenge America&rsquo;s 70-year Asian hegemony; the growing tensions between the West and Russia over who will control lands traditionally part of the Russian sphere of influence; the progressive feverishness and acrimony of the Middle East, unleashed in part by the U.S. incursion into the region and propelled now by sectarian passions and geopolitical interests; the looming confrontation between the United States and Iran; the transformation of Turkey from a nation facing West and extolling pluralism into an increasingly Islamist dictatorship; the emergence of a nuclear threat from North Korea; the rise of Western nationalism; and the surge in immigration that threatens European and American cultural and societal stability.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>What&rsquo;s striking about many of these developments is the extent to which they have generated huge unresolved questions that will have to play out well into the future. Hence, there&rsquo;s no reason to believe the post-Cold war era &mdash; a time pregnant with change and conflict &mdash; will end anytime soon.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>Also noteworthy is the extent to which Americans, and particularly American leaders, cling to a global status quo that is in progressive erosion. A case in point was Arizona Sen. John McCain&rsquo;s recent speech before the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia. He talked about America&rsquo;s \u00ab\u00a0indispensability to international peace and stability and to the progress of humanity.\u00a0\u00bb He said that \u00ab\u00a0we are a land made of ideals,\u00a0\u00bb and we must be \u00ab\u00a0their champions abroad.\u00a0\u00bb He said we have a \u00ab\u00a0duty to remain &lsquo;the last best hope of earth.&rsquo; \u00ab\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>This implies that America represents universal principles of governance and national rectitude that must be spread around the globe. But that&rsquo;s the very concept that contributed to today&rsquo;s Middle East chaos when George W. Bush led America into the region \u00ab\u00a0to end tyranny in our world.\u00a0\u00bb It helped generate the tensions in Ukraine when the Barack Obama administration supported a coup against that nation&rsquo;s elected president and threatened Russia&rsquo;s ancient geopolitical interests.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>No, America needs fresh thinking more in tune with the profound changes washing over the globe and the new realities aborning. American global hegemony won&rsquo;t work. American exceptionalism is a national conceit that has been proved ridiculous by events. Our ideals are right for us and worth fighting for, but they aren&rsquo;t universal and shouldn&rsquo;t be pushed upon other peoples of other lands. Exhibit A for this fundament of geopolitical realism is the Middle East, which is going its own way irrespective of American wishes and American power &mdash; not to mention American ideals of the kind extolled by Sen. McCain.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>If America is to play a major role in moving the world toward greater stability and peace, it must abandon hegemonic ambitions in the name of American universalism. It must instead accept regional spheres of influence while protecting its own sphere of influence in the Americas, the Caribbean, the Gulf of Mexico and surrounding waters. It must maintain its close ties with Europe, its cultural wellspring. It must opt for a foreign policy based on the imperative of promoting a global balance of power.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>Can such an approach help foster a new era of global stability? Perhaps, perhaps not. But Sen. McCain&rsquo;s status quo approach will simply add further to the global chaos.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><h4>Robert W. Merry<\/h4><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Un effondrement en qu\u00eate d&rsquo;identit\u00e9 Il ne manque pas de textes sur cet immense ph\u00e9nom\u00e8ne caract\u00e9risant nos Temps de temp\u00eate, que nous identifions comme l&rsquo;effondrement du Syst\u00e8me (GCES, pour Grande Crise de l&rsquo;Effondrement du Syst\u00e8me). Certains, bien entendu, sont plus significatifs, plus structur\u00e9s que d&rsquo;autres et renforcent la connaissance intuitive que nous pouvons avoir du&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[4270,8294,5662,5651,13053,13052,12436,12735],"class_list":["post-77277","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-autodestruction","tag-crisique","tag-cruise","tag-deffondrement","tag-gces","tag-merry","tag-neo-isolationnisme","tag-tourbillon"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77277","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=77277"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77277\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=77277"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=77277"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=77277"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}