{"id":77324,"date":"2017-06-20T08:47:57","date_gmt":"2017-06-20T08:47:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2017\/06\/20\/les-lgtbq-remplacent-les-neocons\/"},"modified":"2017-06-20T08:47:57","modified_gmt":"2017-06-20T08:47:57","slug":"les-lgtbq-remplacent-les-neocons","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2017\/06\/20\/les-lgtbq-remplacent-les-neocons\/","title":{"rendered":"Les LGTBQ remplacent les neocons<\/em>"},"content":{"rendered":"

Les LGTBQ remplacent les neocons<\/em><\/h2>\n<\/p>\n

De grandes et profondes transformations se font sous nos yeux, \u00e0 l’occasion d’\u00e9v\u00e9nements s’entrem\u00ealant dans les \u00ab\u00a0tourbillons crisiques\u00a0\u00bb et d\u00e9veloppant spontan\u00e9ment, pour se justifier, des simulacres de situation. (Opposera-t-on, pour mieux s’en expliquer et am\u00e9liorer le rangement de notre perception quelque chose que l’on pourrait baptiser \u00ab\u00a0simulacres-de-situation\u00a0\u00bb s’opposant aux v\u00e9rit\u00e9s-de-situation<\/a> <\/strong>? Le simulacre-de-situation int\u00e9grant alors \u00e0 la fois la narrative<\/em> et le d\u00e9terminisme-narrativiste<\/a> pour atteindre le rang d’un concept fondamental et se suffisant \u00e0 lui-m\u00eame ? On y travaille…)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Il est certain que l’antirussisme<\/a>, cet \u00e9v\u00e9nement psychologique et pathologique majeur, fournit un formidable champ de manœuvre pour cette sorte d’exercice de d\u00e9veloppement acc\u00e9l\u00e9r\u00e9 des situations psychologiques coupl\u00e9es \u00e0 la puissance du syst\u00e8me de la communication, le tout engendrant de nouvelles situations (de nouveaux \u00ab\u00a0simulacres-de-situation\u00a0\u00bb). Dans sa derni\u00e8re chronique du 19 juin 2017<\/a>, Justin Raimondo, revient sur le cas de James T. Hodgkinson<\/a>, l’homme qui a attaqu\u00e9 des parlementaires r\u00e9publicains et qui en a bless\u00e9 un tr\u00e8s s\u00e9rieusement avant d’\u00eatre lui-m\u00eame abattu. Raimondo rappelle qu’outre d’\u00eatre partisan de Sanders, Hodgkinson \u00e9tait un fervent admirateur de Rachel Maddow, pr\u00e9sentatrice-vedette de MSNBC, la chaîne-TV pourtant compl\u00e8tement int\u00e9gr\u00e9e dans la presseSyst\u00e8me, la plus radicalis\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Maddow elle-m\u00eame, lesbienne et fervente partisane des causes LGTBQ, tient une tribune qu’on ne peut que qualifier d’antirusse selon le concept d’antirussisme par la densit\u00e9 et l’importance accord\u00e9es au sujet. The Intercept<\/a><\/em> a montr\u00e9 que le traitement du Russiagate<\/a><\/em> sur le tr\u00e8s important segment de Maddow sur MSNBC est largement sup\u00e9rieur, en temps d’antenne, au traitement de tous les autres sujets r\u00e9unis<\/strong>. Exemple de d\u00e9claration de Maddow que signale Raimondo : « Si cette pr\u00e9sidence est effectivement le r\u00e9sultat d’une op\u00e9ration des Russes, eh bien, si cette pr\u00e9sidence am\u00e9ricaine est effectivement la production d’une collusion entre des services de renseignement russes et d’une \u00e9quipe de campagne pr\u00e9sidentielle US, je veux dire que c’est quelque chose d’\u00e9norme<\/em>… [NDLR : on comprend ici, dans cette intervention du 17 avril 2017<\/a>, que, pour Maddow, le \u00ab\u00a0si\u00a0\u00bb est de pure forme] Ce n’est plus une partie de la politique am\u00e9ricaine ; ce n’est plus, vous voyez, la bataille partisane habituelle entre R\u00e9publicains et D\u00e9mocrates. C’est une guerre internationale conduite contre notre pays.<\/em> »<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Autour de Maddow \u00e0 qui Hodgkinson a beaucoup \u00e9crit en tant qu’animatrice vedette-LGBTQ de MSNBC, et de l’acte commis par Hodgkinson et qui fut escamot\u00e9 dans les \u00e9missions de Maddow, Raimondo pr\u00e9sente une analogie qui peut surprendre \u00e0 premi\u00e8re vue, mais \u00e0 premi\u00e8re vue seulement. Maddow n’est pas une gauchiste \u00e9meuti\u00e8re et ultra-marxiste comme celles des ann\u00e9es 1960-1970, non elle est d’abord et avant tout scrupuleusement progressiste et soci\u00e9tale (progressiste-soci\u00e9tale, selon notre rangement), c’est-\u00e0-dire d’abord enflamm\u00e9e pour la cause des minorit\u00e9s et \u00ab\u00a0pseudo-d\u00e9viances\u00a0\u00bb sexuelles (LGTBQ) ; pourtant Raimondo insiste pour la placer exactement l\u00e0 où se trouvaient les fous de l’hyper-extr\u00eame-droite du d\u00e9but des ann\u00e9es 1960 qui voyaient les Russes-Sovi\u00e9tiques partout <\/strong>:<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

« This sort of craziness is usually reserved for the farther fringes of the American polity. <\/em>Back in the 1960s, far-r<\/em>ight groups like <\/em>the Minutemen<\/a><\/em> – who believed the United States government was effectively under the Kremlin’s control – armed themselves to prepare for the day when they would \u00ab\u00a0liberate\u00a0\u00bb America. Indeed, this sort of lunacy has traditionally been a fixture of extreme right-wing politics in this country: that it has now appeared on the left – and not the far-left, but in the \u00ab\u00a0mainstream\u00a0\u00bb of the Democratic party, which has taken up the Russia-gate conspiracy theory to the virtual exclusion of all else — is the proximate cause of what I call Hodgkinson’s Disease: the radicalization of formerly anodyne Democrats into a twenty-first century version of the Weathermen.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

» How did this happen? Democratic party leaders, in tandem with their journalistic camarilla, have validated <\/em>an unconvincing conspiracy theory<\/a><\/em> for which <\/em>not a lick<\/a><\/em> of definitive evidence has been provided: the idea that the Russians \u00ab\u00a0stole\u00a0\u00bb the election on behalf of Trump, and that the Trump campaign cooperated in this treasonous effort<\/em>… »<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Nous rappelions derni\u00e8rement, sous le titre « The Russians are coming !<\/a> The Russians are coming ! <\/em>» cette atmosph\u00e8re des ann\u00e9es 1960 au travers de deux films, en plus du Manchurian Candidate<\/a><\/em> qui magnifiait le complot communiste, et qui fut d’ailleurs rappel\u00e9 \u00e0 propos de Trump (The Siberian Candidate<\/em>) par rien de moins que le brillant et rationnel Prix Nobel d’Economie Paul Krugman :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

« Nous sommes d\u00e9sol\u00e9s, ou peut-\u00eatre enchant\u00e9s apr\u00e8s tout, de devoir rappeler que cette exclamation redoubl\u00e9e est aussi le titre d’une com\u00e9die d\u00e9sopilante<\/a> de 1966 contant l’histoire d’un brave sous-marin sovi\u00e9tique en assez mauvais \u00e9tat et en difficult\u00e9, accostant sur une c\u00f4te US pour demander de l’aide et d\u00e9clenchant une panique affreuse achaland\u00e9s d’un appel aux armes g\u00e9n\u00e9ral chez les locaux tandis que les matelots sovi\u00e9tiques\/russes tentent de les calmer, – tout cela, deux ans apr\u00e8s le \u00ab\u00a0Dr. Strangelove<\/a>, Or How I Learned To Love The Bomb\u00a0\u00bb, de Kubrick, qui nous avait instruit sur l’\u00e9tat de l’esprit des dirigeants du syst\u00e8me de l’am\u00e9ricanisme et autres membres du Deep State.<\/em>.. »<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\n

Comme on le lira, la colonne de Raimondo est pleine d’int\u00e9r\u00eat, mais surtout elle nous confronte indirectement, sans que Raimondo lui-m\u00eame ne le souligne, avec le fait de la radicalisation et la politisation extr\u00eames d’un sentiment progressiste qui est au d\u00e9part, ou se pr\u00e9tend, soci\u00e9tal<\/strong> ; jusqu’\u00e0 sa transformation en une pathologie d’une politique absolument belliciste, complotiste et jusqu’auboutiste. La diff\u00e9rence avec la r\u00e9f\u00e9rence des Minutemen <\/em>d’extr\u00eame-droite des ann\u00e9es 1960, et aussi avec les gauchistes extr\u00e9mistes jusqu’aux ann\u00e9es 1970 (Weathermen<\/em> et Black Panthers<\/em>) tient en ceci que ces extr\u00e9mistes disons de la gauche LGTBQ ne sont justement pas en position extr\u00e9miste dans le syst\u00e8me de la communication<\/strong>. Comme on l’a dit, MSNBC et Maddow font partie de la presseSyst\u00e8me, ou Mainstream<\/em> (MSM) aux USA. On aura ainsi remarqu\u00e9 que, depuis des mois sinon une ou deux ann\u00e9es, parall\u00e8lement \u00e0 la candidature \u00e9videmment \u00e0 tendance f\u00e9ministe d’Hillary Clinton, tout se passe comme si les phalanges progressistes-soci\u00e9tales les plus engag\u00e9es dans le mouvement LGTBQ avaient remplac\u00e9 les neocons<\/em> dans leur r\u00f4le de warmongers (\u00ab\u00a0fauteurs de guerre\u00a0\u00bb)<\/em>, avec cette m\u00eame position, sinon plus puissante, que celle que les neocons <\/em>avaient occup\u00e9e dans la presseSyst\u00e8me et le syst\u00e8me de la communication<\/strong>. Les progressistes-soci\u00e9taux\/LGTBQ ont cet avantage d’une sorte de \u00ab\u00a0l\u00e9gitimit\u00e9 morale\u00a0\u00bb, d’un magist\u00e8re moral postmoderne plac\u00e9 au centre du Politically Correct <\/em>(PC) qui exerce, lui, une dictature intellectuelle, et caract\u00e9ris\u00e9 justement par l’exercice d’une compl\u00e8te terreur intellectuelle, \u00e0 l’int\u00e9rieur du Syst\u00e8me.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Les neocons <\/em>se sont divis\u00e9s \u00e0 propos de Trump et ils se trouvent aujourd’hui confront\u00e9s au d\u00e9sordre extr\u00eame de la politique ext\u00e9rieure US produit aussi bien par le pr\u00e9sident que par le Congr\u00e8s, que par une multitude de contradictions qui lui donnent un aspect compl\u00e8tement erratique, ce que le ministre allemand des affaires \u00e9trang\u00e8res a d\u00e9sign\u00e9 comme une \u00ab\u00a0trumpisation\u00a0\u00bb<\/a>. (Cette division des neocons <\/em>est en fait apparue d\u00e8s 2011<\/a> avec l’affaire libyenne où ils se sont s\u00e9par\u00e9s en partisans et adversaires de l’intervention ; depuis, chaque \u00ab\u00a0incident\u00a0\u00bb de ce genre tend \u00e0 les diviser encore davantage et leur influence a fortement p\u00e2ti de cette division.<\/strong>..) Au contraire, les progressistes-soci\u00e9taux\/LGTBQ se trouvent rassembl\u00e9s sur une ligne de force d’une puissance extr\u00eame, notamment contre la Russie avec le Russiagate<\/em> dont ils sont les principaux incendiaires. <\/em>Pour eux, en effet, il s’agit d’une ligne de force belliciste extr\u00eamement coh\u00e9rente<\/strong>, aussi bien du point de vie politique (g\u00e9opolitique) selon la tradition am\u00e9ricaniste de la Guerre froide ; id\u00e9ologique selon la mantra<\/em> d\u00e9mocratique et droitdel’hommiste qu’on connaît bien ; et, surtout, ligne de force de type-PC et postmoderne, d\u00e9constructrice \u00e9videmment, compl\u00e8tement anti-traditionnelle et s’exerc\u00e7ant dans ce sens contre les Russes et Poutine qui, comme nous le rappelons souvent<\/a> depuis au moins 5 ans<\/a>, repr\u00e9sentent aujourd’hui le plus puissant p\u00f4le de d\u00e9fense de la tradition<\/strong>, dans son sens le plus large, clairement explicit\u00e9e et puissamment affirm\u00e9 dans les termes les plus fermes.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Cette \u00e9volution est pass\u00e9e par une phase interm\u00e9diaire avec le surgissement avec Obama de la tendance R2P (\u00ab\u00a0Right To Intervene<\/em>\u00ab\u00a0), qui \u00e9tait une sorte de n\u00e9oconservatisme de la gauche humaniste, mais dont on a rapidement per\u00e7u l’aspect LGTBQ avec l’implication de l’administration Obama et sa dimension antiraciste et f\u00e9ministe<\/strong> (il va sans dire que l’antiracisme trouve naturellement sa place au sein des LGTBQ). On se rappelle que les principales avocates du R2P \u00e9tait justement des femmes militantes en situation directe de pouvoir (les \u00ab\u00a0harpies\u00a0\u00bb<\/a> d’Obama : Clinton, Rice, Power, Nuland, Flournoy) suivant et dirigeant la pr\u00e9sence d’un affectivisme<\/a> puissant dans la politique ext\u00e9rieure d’Obama. Parall\u00e8lement, diverses affaires m\u00e9diatico-soci\u00e9tales (les Pussy Riots<\/em>) contribuaient \u00e0 installer un antirussisme radical dans le mouvement LGTBQ. Bien entendu, ces cr\u00e9atures de genre f\u00e9minin qui feraient croire \u00e0 l’intol\u00e9rance de ceux qui les mettent en cause sont totalement oppos\u00e9es \u00e0 des femmes politiques d\u00e9veloppant une r\u00e9flexion rationnelle, telle Tulsi Gabbard<\/a>, ce qui montre que l’argument LGTBQ est compl\u00e8tement id\u00e9ologis\u00e9 et politis\u00e9 puisque Gabbard est aussi bien, – sinon mieux, – une femme avec une conscience politique que ne l’est une Maddow. Bien entendu (suite), tout cela pr\u00e9tend se situer \u00e0 gauche (\u00ab\u00a0progressiste\u00a0\u00bb) de fa\u00e7on \u00e0 poursuivre l’usage de l’arme de communication du PC, malgr\u00e9 les int\u00e9ressants enseignements des v\u00e9rit\u00e9s de l’Histoire<\/strong>. (*) Le mouvement LGTBQ n’est ni de gauche ni de droite, il ne peut \u00eatre r\u00e9duit \u00e0 ce rangement : dans sa forme actuelle, il est radicalement d\u00e9constructeur et, en cela, il poursuit \u00e0 sa fa\u00e7on le r\u00f4le des homosexuels allemands dans le d\u00e9veloppement du pangermanisme et la formation du nazisme.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Ci-dessous, le texte de Justin Raimondi du 19 juin 2017<\/a>, sur Antiwar.com<\/em>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

dedefensa.org<\/em><\/h4>\n<\/p>\n

Note<\/h3>\n<\/p>\n

(*) Le mouvement LGTBQ, qui se veut soci\u00e9tal progressiste, s’affirme donc de gauche, et notamment l’homosexualit\u00e9 postmoderne qui s’affiche de gauche dans la tradition (?) de Foucault et des d\u00e9constructeurs ; ce qui conduit \u00e0 installer l’homosexualit\u00e9 masculine \u00e0 gauche et \u00e0 \u00e9vacuer l’un des principaux mouvements homosexuels politis\u00e9s de l’histoire, qui est l’homosexualit\u00e9 allemande du XIX\u00e8me et du d\u00e9but du XX\u00e8me si\u00e8cle. Ce mouvement, comme le rappelle Robert Simonnot<\/a> dans son livre Rose et Brun <\/em>fut tr\u00e8s largement impliqu\u00e9 dans la dynamique pangermaniste \u00e0 laquelle il participa conceptuellement, et, au-del\u00e0, \u00e0 la dynamique nazie avec R\u00f6hm et ses SA. R\u00f6hm est consid\u00e9r\u00e9 par certains comme le v\u00e9ritable inspirateur de la doctrine nazie et de Hitler, et s’il fut liquid\u00e9 avec ses SA au moment de la Nuit des Longs Couteaux<\/em> de 1934, ce fut moins \u00e0 cause de l’homosexualit\u00e9 que de la crainte de Hitler de voir R\u00f6hm prendre la direction du parti NSDAP gr\u00e2ce \u00e0 la puissance des SA, v\u00e9ritable arm\u00e9e parall\u00e8le qui rassembla plus d’un million d’hommes \u00e0 son sommet. La pers\u00e9cution des homosexuels qui suivit (\u00ab\u00a0\u00e9toile rose\u00a0\u00bb) fut un moyen pour Hitler de se gagner le soutien des conservateurs traditionnalistes allemands autant que de verrouiller cette purge \u00e0 l’int\u00e9rieur du parti nazi… Où l’on voit que le parall\u00e8le \u00e9tabli par Raimondo entre les LGTBQ et l’extr\u00eame-droite complotiste du d\u00e9but des ann\u00e9es 1960 n’est pas seulement symbolique. Les \u00ab\u00a0Queer<\/a>\u00a0\u00bb (\u00ab\u00a0\u00e9trange\u00a0\u00bb en anglais) du Q de LGTBQ<\/a> ne sont pas si \u00ab\u00a0\u00e9tranges\u00a0\u00bb qu’ils veulent bien le faire croire<\/strong> : ils ont une ascendance extr\u00eamement significative et qui a sa place dans les grandes dynamiques politiques que ces m\u00eames LGTBQ vomissent aujourd’hui avec entrain. Tout cela, malgr\u00e9 les maquillages de fortune, se retrouve dans la logique de la postmodernit\u00e9 et des d\u00e9constructeurs<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

_________________________<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Hodgkinson’s Disease: Politics and Paranoia in the Age of Trump<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n

James T. Hodgkinson, the would-be assassin of Republican congressmen, wasn’t a radical. If you look at his published output – a series of letters<\/a> to his local newspaper in Belleville, Illinois, as well as the majority of his Internet postings – it’s mostly about matters nearly every progressive cares about: taxes (the rich don’t pay enough), healthcare (the government must provide), income inequality (it’s all a Republican plot). All in all, a pretty unremarkable worldview that any partisan Democrat – either a Bernie Sanders supporter, as Hodginkinson was, or a Hillary fan – could sign on to. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

So what drove him over the edge?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

One of his more recent Facebook posts<\/a> was a link to a petition that called for \u00ab\u00a0the legal removal of the President and Vice-President, et. al., for Misprision of Treason.\u00a0\u00bb Hodgkinson had signed it and he was asking his readers to follow suit: \u00ab\u00a0Trump is a Traitor,\u00a0\u00bb he wrote, \u00ab\u00a0Trump Has Destroyed Our Democracy. It’s Time to Destroy Trump & Co.\u00a0\u00bb He was also a big fan of Rachel Maddow<\/a>, who – incredibly — has spent the majority<\/em> of her airtime ranting about \u00ab\u00a0The Russian Connection,\u00a0\u00bb as this Intercept piece<\/a> documents. Hodgkinson was also a member of a Facebook group ominously dubbing itself \u00ab\u00a0Terminate the Republican Party<\/a>,\u00a0\u00bb an appellation Hodgkinson apparently took quite literally. The group has over 13,000 members. The main page<\/a> of the Terminators is adorned with a cartoon<\/a> of Putin manipulating Trump like a puppet.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

When Hodgkinson left his home and his job to travel to Alexandria, Virginia, he told his wife he was going to \u00ab\u00a0work on tax issues.\u00a0\u00bb But is that what motivated his murderous spree? Do \u00ab\u00a0tax issues\u00a0\u00bb really seem like something that would inspire someone to plan and carry out an assassination attempt that, but for the presence of Capitol police on the scene, would have certainly resulted in a massacre?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Hodgkinson clearly believed that the President of the United States was an agent of a foreign power. He had signed on to the idea that Trump not only benefited from a Russian campaign to discredit Hillary Clinton, but that he is engaged in a war against his own country. As Maddow put it<\/a> in one of her more unhinged broadcasts:<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\u00ab\u00a0If the presidency is effectively a Russian op, right, if the American Presidency right now is the product of collusion between the Russian Intelligence Services, and an American campaign, I mean, that is so profoundly big. This is not part of American politics; this is not, you know, partisan warfare between Republicans and Democrats. This is international warfare against our country.\u00a0\u00bb<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\u00ab\u00a0International warfare\u00a0\u00bb – and Hodgkinson, a soldier in that fight, saw it as his duty to use the sort of weapons that are commonly used in international warfare. That’s why he sprayed that baseball field with a hail of gunfire – over fifty rounds. And when his rifle ran out of ammunition, he took out his handgun and continued firing. Because \u00ab\u00a0this is not, you know, partisan warfare between Republicans and Democrats. This is international warfare against our country\u00a0\u00bb – and it’s the obligation of patriotic citizens to take up that fight and take out the enemy.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

This sort of craziness is usually reserved for the farther fringes of the American polity. Back in the 1960s, far-right groups like the Minutemen<\/a> – who believed the United States government was effectively under the Kremlin’s control – armed themselves to prepare for the day when they would \u00ab\u00a0liberate\u00a0\u00bb America. Indeed, this sort of lunacy has traditionally been a fixture of extreme right-wing politics in this country: that it has now appeared on the left – and not the far-left, but in the \u00ab\u00a0mainstream\u00a0\u00bb of the Democratic party, which has taken up the Russia-gate conspiracy theory to the virtual exclusion of all else — is the proximate cause of what I call Hodgkinson’s Disease: the radicalization of formerly anodyne Democrats into a twenty-first century version of the Weathermen.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

How did this happen? Democratic party leaders, in tandem with their journalistic camarilla, have validated an unconvincing conspiracy theory<\/a> for which not a lick<\/a> of definitive evidence has been provided: the idea that the Russians \u00ab\u00a0stole\u00a0\u00bb the election on behalf of Trump, and that the Trump campaign cooperated in this treasonous effort.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Yet that hasn’t stopped the Democratic party leadership from taking this ball and running with it. As Jennifer Palmieri, a top official in the Clinton campaign, put it<\/a>, Democrats should push the \u00ab\u00a0collusion\u00a0\u00bb issue \u00ab\u00a0relentlessly and above all else. They should talk about it in every interview.\u00a0\u00bb The New York Times<\/em> writes about<\/a> this conspiracy theory as if it is uncontested fact. Democratic officeholders<\/a> have declared that the alleged \u00ab\u00a0hacking\u00a0\u00bb of the election was an \u00ab\u00a0act of war<\/a>\u00a0\u00bb – with the NeverTrump Republicans echoing the party line<\/a> – and the Twitterverse’s conspiracy theorists are having a field day with the dangerously loony contention that we are at war with Russia<\/a>. What’s more, the wildest imaginings of the nutjob crowd are being taken up and amplified by \u00ab\u00a0respectable\u00a0\u00bb people like constitutional lawyer Laurence Tribe<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

In this way Hodgkinson’s Disease was incubated, its toxicity penetrating the mind of a suggestible and embittered little man until the poison had accumulated to such an extent that it burst through to the surface in an explosion of uncontrollable rage. Rachel Maddow is the theory: James T. Hodgkinson is the practice. The ultimate result is civil war.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

That such a conflict would be born out of a full-scale delusional system that resembles a third-rate cold war era thriller just adds a Bizarro World<\/a> cast to the whole sorry spectacle. The \u00ab\u00a0Russia-gate\u00a0\u00bb conspiracy theory that has consumed the energies of the media, the Congress, and President Trump is an elaborate hoax. This farrago of falsehood rests on a fallacious assumption<\/a>: that the Russians necessarily \u00ab\u00a0hacked\u00a0\u00bb the DNC and John Podesta’s emails. The contention is that the methods supposedly utilized by the alleged hackers were similar to those used in the past by \u00ab\u00a0suspected\u00a0\u00bb Russian hackers, and that this makes the case. Yet this argument ignores the fact that these tools and methods were already out there, available for anyone to use. This is a textbook example of what cyber-security expert Jeffrey Carr calls \u00ab\u00a0faith-based attribution<\/a>,\u00a0\u00bb which amounts to, at best, an educated guess, and at worst is the end result of confirmation bias combined with the economic incentive to tell a client what they want to hear. In the case of the DNC\/Podesta \u00ab\u00a0hacks,\u00a0\u00bb the company hired to investigate, CrowdStrike, had every reason to echo Hillary Clinton’s contention that the Russians were the guilty party. CrowdStrike, by the way, never gave US law enforcement authorities access to the DNC’s servers: indeed, the FBI’s request for access was rebuffed<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

The \u00ab\u00a0Russia-gate\u00a0\u00bb hoax has injected a pernicious and highly dangerous theme into our political discourse: the accusation that the Trump administration is a traitorous cabal intent on \u00ab\u00a0destroying democracy,\u00a0\u00bb as Hodgkinson put it, and handing over the country to the tender mercies of a foreign power. Taken seriously, this theme necessarily and inevitably leads to violence, which means there’s a good chance we’ll see more Hodgkinsons in the headlines. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

And standing behind it all is the Deep State – the leakers (with access to all our communications) who are feeding disinformation to the Washington Post<\/em>and the New York Times<\/em> in order to bring down this presidency. One prong of this operation is embodied in the Special Counsel, Robert Mueller, whose investigation was provoked and fueled by Deep State leakage. The other prong consists of the useful idiot crowd, those who believe the propaganda and can be mobilized to take to the streets.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

The Deep State types don’t have to get in direct contact with people like Hodgkinson in order to provoke violence against this administration or Trump’s supporters. They have only to continue to do what they’ve been doing since before Trump even took office, covertly spreading the idea that Trump is \u00ab\u00a0Putin’s puppet,\u00a0\u00bb as Mrs. Clinton put it: radicalized useful idiots like Hodgkinson will do the rest. It is eerily similar to the methods the CIA has used to overthrow foreign governments: spread rumors, utilizing their journalistic sock-puppets, and indirectly motivate and mobilize mobs to carry out their \u00ab\u00a0regime-change\u00a0\u00bb agenda. The only difference now is that they’re doing what they’ve always done on the home front instead of in, say, Lower Slobbovia.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Yes, that’s where we are right now – we’ve become Lower Slobbovia<\/a>. Get used to it, folks, because it won’t end until the Deep State is defeated and dismantled.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Justin Raimondo<\/h4><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Les LGTBQ remplacent les neocons De grandes et profondes transformations se font sous nos yeux, \u00e0 l’occasion d’\u00e9v\u00e9nements s’entrem\u00ealant dans les \u00ab\u00a0tourbillons crisiques\u00a0\u00bb et d\u00e9veloppant spontan\u00e9ment, pour se justifier, des simulacres de situation. (Opposera-t-on, pour mieux s’en expliquer et am\u00e9liorer le rangement de notre perception quelque chose que l’on pourrait baptiser \u00ab\u00a0simulacres-de-situation\u00a0\u00bb s’opposant aux v\u00e9rit\u00e9s-de-situation… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[934,12644,13112,13110,9105,5852,6208,13109,12406,4337,13111,2639],"class_list":["post-77324","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-clinton","tag-harpies","tag-hodgkinson","tag-homosexualite","tag-maddow","tag-nazis","tag-obama","tag-queer","tag-r2p","tag-raimondo","tag-rohm","tag-trump"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77324","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=77324"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77324\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=77324"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=77324"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=77324"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}