Comme l’on sait, la situation se trouve \u00e0 nouveau, pour la ni\u00e8me occurrence, sur le bord d’une possible attaque US contre la Syrie<\/strong>… \u00ab\u00a0Cela, \u00e0 partir de la ni\u00e8me attaque chimique dont il est absolument inutile et sans le moindre int\u00e9r\u00eat de savoir s’il existe la moindre preuve que la responsabilit\u00e9 puisse et doive en \u00eatre attribu\u00e9e, contre l’\u00e9vidence de tous ses propres int\u00e9r\u00eats strat\u00e9giques du moment, au pr\u00e9sident Assad. Ni\u00e8me indication d’un montage, d’un falseflag<\/em>, d’une provocation, absurdit\u00e9 de faire d’Assad le coupable d’un tel acte, – donc et par cons\u00e9quent une attaque contre Assad s’impose puisqu’elle-m\u00eame (l’attaque) constituera la preuve centrale de sa culpabilit\u00e9 (celle d’Assad), qu’elle engendrera par elle-m\u00eame autant de preuves post\u00e9rieures n\u00e9cessaires qu’elle (l’attaque) \u00e9tait justifi\u00e9e, y compris l’absence de preuves \u00e9vidente m\u00eame apr\u00e8s l’attaque comme preuve supr\u00eame de la culpabilit\u00e9…\u00a0\u00bb Cela \u00e9tait donc un message d’information en provenance de \u00ab\u00a0D.C.-la-folle\u00a0\u00bb<\/strong>, – \u00ab\u00a0l’Asile\u00a0\u00bb, selon le code op\u00e9rationnel de la CIA.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Personne n’y comprend rien parmi ceux qui s’affirment comme justifi\u00e9s d’appuyer de leurs poids institutionnel la d\u00e9cision d’attaquer, comme le montre cette interview d’un s\u00e9nateur r\u00e9publicain du Mississipi par Tucker Carlson<\/a>, s\u00e9nateur bouche b\u00e9e devant certaines questions \u00e9videntes, balbutiant et r\u00e9pondant \u00e0 propos de la pluie et du beau temps<\/strong>. \u00ab\u00a0D.C.-la-folle\u00a0\u00bb, n’est-ce vraiment qu’une formule un peu moqueuse ?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n (Nous laissons de c\u00f4t\u00e9 le reste de la bassecour, surtout les grands et responsables membres de l’UE, – nous ne disons pas \u00ab\u00a0nations\u00a0\u00bb tant ce mot est vide de sens, d\u00e9structur\u00e9, dans cette occurrence. Jamais dans l’histoire de notre civilisation, l’Allemagne, la France et l’impayable UK se sont trouv\u00e9es autant et aussi d\u00e9nu\u00e9es de la moindre pens\u00e9e de politique ext\u00e9rieure, totalement enferm\u00e9es dans le simulacre comme un ver \u00e0 soie devenu chenille chenue pour faire son dernier temps dans un cocon de fin des temps.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Toute cette introduction l\u00e9g\u00e8rement \u00e9chevel\u00e9e pose la question de la stupidit\u00e9, mais surtout celle de la folie<\/strong>. Il y a un texte int\u00e9ressant \u00e0 cet \u00e9gard, parce qu’il vient d’un commentateur qui a fait ses preuves, qui a toujours argument\u00e9 pour son camp selon l’ordre de la rationalit\u00e9, faisant appel \u00e0 des faits et \u00e0 des actions souvent fort bien \u00e9tablis. Justin Raimondo \u00e0 longtemps vari\u00e9 \u00e0 propos de Donald Trump, avec bien des r\u00e9serves, des p\u00e9riodes sceptiques, mais admettant finalement que sa seule pr\u00e9sence et quelques positions marquantes, – outre son America First<\/em>, sa volont\u00e9 proclam\u00e9e de retirer les troupes US de Syrie, – lui valaient une appr\u00e9ciation plut\u00f4t favorable. Et soudain, cette \u00ab\u00a0attaque chimique\u00a0\u00bb comme incroyable montage, et la r\u00e9action furieuse de Trump, vraiment le braiement de fureur qui fait \u00e9clater la cage aux folles ! Alors, Raimondo en vient \u00e0 sortir des sentiers battus, et il n’a pas tort (de sortir des sentiers battus), et il pose la question <\/strong>dans son titre de ce texte du 10 avril 2018<\/a>, que l’on trouve reproduit ci-dessous, avec la r\u00e9ponse pour que nul n’en ignore :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n « Trump: Is He Stupid or Dangerously Crazy? <\/em>He’s both<\/em> » (\u00ab\u00a0Trump est-il un idiot ou un fou dangereux ? Les deux \u00e0 la fois\u00a0\u00bb)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Raimondo a m\u00eame un mod\u00e8le, d\u00e9crit par le film Les trois visages d’Eve<\/em>, de 1957, d’apr\u00e8s un livre du psychiatre Hervey M. Cleckley<\/a>et de Hervey M. Cleckley<\/a>, d\u00e9crivant le cas d’une patiente, Chris Costner Sizemore. La pathologie identifi\u00e9e est le \u00ab\u00a0d\u00e9sordre identitaire dissociatif\u00a0\u00bb<\/strong>(dissociative identity disorder<\/a><\/em>– multiple personality disorder<\/em>). On voit qu’avec The-Donald<\/em>, Raimondo ne chipote plus et plonge dans les zones sombres de l’individu puisqu’il en arrive, horreur inexpugnable, \u00e0 identifier trois The-Donald <\/em>en un<\/strong> :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n « L’argument de la folie, – une v\u00e9ritable affection mentale, – est encore plus fort, de mon point de vue. Quand le pr\u00e9sident Obama fut confront\u00e9 \u00e0 cette m\u00eame sorte de d’attaque-bidon, selon les descriptions des \u00ab\u00a0activistes\u00a0\u00bb et des \u00ab\u00a0m\u00e9decins\u00a0\u00bb, Trump le pressa de ne surtout pas s’impliquer dans ce pi\u00e8ge<\/a>. pourtant, maintenant qu’il est lui-m\u00eame dans le bureau ovale, il fait ce qu’il pressait Obama de ne pas faire. C’est le comportement classique d’une d\u00e9mence \u00e0 personnalit\u00e9s multiples : ce sont \u00ab\u00a0les trois visages de The-Donald<\/a>\u00a0\u00bb <\/em>»<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Tout le reste du texte est de cette m\u00eame eau, \u00e0 la fois am\u00e8re, furieuse, mi-plaisanterie-catastroph\u00e9e, mi-stup\u00e9faction-attrist\u00e9e, avec le d\u00e9veloppement. Peu nous importe finalement le diagnostic de Raimondo, il suffit d’observer que le commentateur inform\u00e9, brillant, sans liens de compromission ou d’asservissement au Syst\u00e8me, est conduit d\u00e9sormais \u00e0 avancer cette sorte d’hypoth\u00e8ses pour d\u00e9crire, sans pr\u00e9tendre le comprendre, le comportement d’un pr\u00e9sident venu pour mettre de l’ordre dans \u00ab\u00a0la cage-aux-folles\u00a0\u00bb et devenu lui-m\u00eame prisonnier de cette \u00ab\u00a0cage-aux-folles\u00a0\u00bb, et donc d\u00e9crivant d’une m\u00eame plume la \u00ab\u00a0cage-aux-folles\u00a0\u00bb qu’est \u00ab\u00a0D.C.-la-folle\u00a0\u00bb et le pr\u00e9sident lui-m\u00eame<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n (Raimondo y ajoute la stupidit\u00e9, avec GW Bush comme r\u00e9f\u00e9rence, mais cela est beaucoup moins alarmant, les pr\u00e9sidents US n’ayant en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral pas brill\u00e9 par leur intelligence. A cet \u00e9gard, les amis de Trump ne manquent pas d’assurer qu’avec un QI de 157, il est en deuxi\u00e8me position parmi tous les pr\u00e9sidents, le dernier de la classe \u00e9tant Ulysse S. Grant avec 121. Mais le QI qui n’est qu’une indication tronqu\u00e9e d’un scientisme int\u00e9ress\u00e9 ne nous int\u00e9resse pas non plus, nous voulons dire pas plus que la sorte de pathologie d\u00e9busqu\u00e9e par Raimondo : il s’agit simplement de la perte de toutes les r\u00e9f\u00e9rences de l’esprit et de l’\u00e2me qui forment la fermet\u00e9 du caract\u00e8re et \u00e9cartent les tentations du conformisme, du suivisme, du panurgisme, etc., dans un centre prisonnier d’une cage maquill\u00e9e en simulacre \u00e9l\u00e9gant, qui est manifestement producteur de d\u00e9mence et de stupidit\u00e9 pour corrompre les uns et les autres par la voie de la psychologie<\/strong>.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n La d\u00e9solation de Raimondo est \u00e0 consid\u00e9rer subjectivement et objectivement. Subjectivement, on comprend toute l’amertume du commentateur qui, avec la r\u00e9surgence du slogan America First<\/em>, avait cru \u00e0 un tournant vers ses conceptions et sa perception du monde<\/strong>, et la sauvegarde de l’Am\u00e9rique telle qu’il la con\u00e7oit et qu’il l’aime… Et il voit ce qu’il en reste ! Objectivement, c’est-\u00e0-dire pour notre cas et notre jugement qui sont ceux de l’antiSyst\u00e8me se r\u00e9f\u00e9rant \u00e0 lui-m\u00eame, – Delenda Est Systema<\/em>, – Trump est plus que jamais ce personnage <\/strong>sans la moindre substance, sans la moindre conception, pr\u00e9occup\u00e9 de l’imm\u00e9diat sans s’int\u00e9resser \u00e0 la cons\u00e9quence, ce pr\u00e9sident d\u00e9fini d’abord par l'\u00a0\u00bbesprit de la t\u00e9l\u00e9-r\u00e9alit\u00e9<\/a>\u00a0\u00bb ; ce pr\u00e9sident pour lequel chaque observation rimant avec l’accentuation du d\u00e9sordre de l’entit\u00e9 dans laquelle il se trouve, gr\u00e2ce \u00e0 son comportement, garde toute son actualit\u00e9. Ceci par exemple, dans le Journal-dde.crisis<\/em>du 16 septembre 2017<\/a>…<\/p>\n<\/p>\n « Cela a \u00e9t\u00e9 fait et le \u00ab\u00a0cocktail Molotov humain\u00a0\u00bb fait son travail avec un naturel \u00e0 ne pas croire : alimenter sans arr\u00eat le d\u00e9sordre. Trump ne r\u00e9ussit rien, il trahit tout<\/strong>, il met tout le monde en fureur et introduit un effet de blocage dans toutes les politiques du fait de ce d\u00e9sordre, une paralysie par exc\u00e8s d’humeur dans \u00ab\u00a0D.C.-la-folle\u00a0\u00bb. Le Rien continue son œuvre de d\u00e9structuration par ses semailles sans fin des graines du d\u00e9sordre<\/strong><\/em>. »<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Pour nous, cela vaudra demain encore, si et quand il aura fait tirer ses cruise missiles sur la Syrie, ou m\u00eame s’il ne le fait pas. Nous sommes dans une trag\u00e9die-bouffe<\/a>, certes, et la Syrie, et les tromperies sanglantes, et les menaces de guerre en sont la partie tragique ; Trump, lui, c’est la partie-bouffe, et son r\u00f4le n’est pas inutile, loin de l\u00e0.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n _________________________<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n A child could see through the fake \u00ab\u00a0chemical attack\u00a0\u00bb supposedly launched by Bashar al-Assad just as his troops defeated the jihadists and Trump said he wanted out of Syria. But our President can’t, which raises the question: is he as stupid or stupider than George W. Bush? Or is he crazy?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n The bad news is: possibly both. And no, there is no good news.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n It was 6 in the morning this Sunday when the President of the United States sent out this tweet<\/a>:<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \u00ab\u00a0Many dead, including women and children, in mindless CHEMICAL attack in Syria. Area of atrocity is in lockdown and encircled by Syrian Army, making it completely inaccessible to outside world. President Putin, Russia and Iran are responsible for backing Animal Assad. Big price…\u00a0\u00bb<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n We are expected to believe that the Assad regime committed a horrific atrocity against mostly women and children at the very moment when Syrian forces have decisively defeated the Islamist rebels and Trump declared he wanted US troops out of Syria. Days before this fake attack, the Russian Defense Ministry warned<\/a> that a false flag provocation was in the making.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \u00ab\u00a0Big price,\u00a0\u00bb eh? The person paying that price is going to be Trump himself: his deplorables didn’t vote for him so we could establish an Islamic Sunni state in Syria, as John Bolton has long advocated<\/a>. If he gets into a war – and the longer we stay in Syria, the bigger are the chances that we’ll be pulled into yet another quagmire – his presidency is doomed.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n So let’s get down to brass tacks, as they used to say: doesn’t this prove I was wrong about Trump and his movement all along? Weren’t all the smarty-pants NeverTrumpers right from the very beginning?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n I was very wrong to discount the role of character, personality, and intelligence: Trump is simply not fit to be President. The foreign policy he seemed to be promising, summed up in the slogan \u00ab\u00a0America First,\u00a0\u00bb was and is the right path for this country – but life is not about policies divorced from individuals. People like me – writers, journalists, and publicists – think in terms of ideas, but these cannot exist apart from the people who hold them, or pretend to hold them. Trump is a very imperfect vessel for a very good policy – and that is definitely an understatement.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Yet that has nothing to do with what I said and wrote<\/a> about Trump’s various foreign policy pronouncements right up until very recently: as I’ve pointed out repeatedly, and exhaustively, the very fact that a successful presidential candidate criticized the Iraq war (\u00ab\u00a0they lied\u00a0\u00bb) and our policy of global intervention – e.g., questioned NATO’s existence – was and still is a great step forward. That Trump isn’t living up to his campaign promises and his post-election rhetoric is another matter entirely. The \u00ab\u00a0deplorables\u00a0\u00bb are in open rebellion<\/a> against this new turn: Trump is losing his base.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n So here’s the question: is he stupid, like George W. Bush, or is he crazy, in the tradition of, say, Richard M. Nixon?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n The case for stupidity is fairly strong: after all, where’s the evidence that Assad launched a chemical attack? Like the series of fake \u00ab\u00a0attacks\u00a0\u00bb<\/a> touted by the jihadist rebels over the years, this one lacks verification – but that doesn’t bother the War Party. Since when do they need evidence? Last time Trump fell for this routine it turned out that his own Secretary of Defense admitted<\/a> – well after the US bombing raid – that there was \u00ab\u00a0no evidence\u00a0\u00bb that the Syrian government had launched a chemical attack. The same dodgy<\/a> \u00ab\u00a0proof\u00a0\u00bb beleaguers<\/a> the Skripal \u00ab\u00a0poisoning\u00a0\u00bb case in Britain<\/a> – and, what a coincidence, the same villains are being blamed – Putin & Co. The idea that Assad had anything to gain from launching such an attack is not even worth refuting: he’d already won the war. So what would be the point? It isn’t hard to understand this, yet our President is clueless – or pretends to be.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n The case for craziness – a real mental affliction – is even stronger, in my opinion. When President Obama was confronted with the same phony \u00ab\u00a0attacks,\u00a0\u00bb as reported by jihadist \u00ab\u00a0activists\u00a0\u00bb and \u00ab\u00a0medics,\u00a0\u00bb Trump urged him to stay out of it<\/a>. Yet now that’s he’s in the Oval Office, he’s doing what he urged Obama not<\/em> to do. This is the classic behavior pattern of a schizoid nutjob with multiple personalities: it’s \u00ab\u00a0The Three Faces of the Donald<\/a>,\u00a0\u00bb and the big question is which one will emerge today?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Another issue I was apparently dead wrong about is the ascension of John Bolton as National Security Advisor: no big deal<\/a>, I said. Wrong<\/em>! I refuse to believe that Trump is caving in to the War Party on Syria just as Bolton gets the keys to his new office<\/a>. And here’s another non-coincidence: this new turn comes just after Trump got into an argument<\/a> with his generals over Syria. He wanted out: they insisted we stay. It didn’t take him long to find an excuse – this bogus \u00ab\u00a0attack\u00a0\u00bb – to cave. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n So he’s not just stupid, and crazy – he’s also a coward. He refuses to confront the War Party head on, despite his campaign trail rhetoric.Just the other day he was telling crowds in Ohio how we were on the way out of Syria because \u00ab\u00a0we have to take care of our own country.\u00a0\u00bb The crowd cheered. Would he go back to that same audience and tell them we need to intervene in a country that’s been wracked by warfare for years, with no real hope of a peaceful settlement? Of course not. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n He’s a Beta male masquerading as an Alpha.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n The top three most powerful foreign lobbies in Washington are pushing the US to not only stay in Syria but to expand the role of US troops: the Saudis, who directly support the jihadist rebels, the Israelis, who have long sought to overthrow Assad, and the British, who are behind the maniacal anti-Russian propaganda campaign, starting with the shenanigans of Christopher Steele. Trump’s craven capitulation to these \u00ab\u00a0allies\u00a0\u00bb is yet more evidence of his cowardice under fire. And there’s no doubt that his blaming Russia – and naming Putin – as supposedly responsible for this \u00ab\u00a0gas attack\u00a0\u00bb is a ploy to get Robert Mueller off his back. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n I have to say that the future looks grim. This puts Trump’s entire foreign policy agenda up for grabs, including the once-promising Korean peace initiative. Will he sabotage what might have been his greatest accomplishment – peace on the Korean peninsula?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n It’s entirely possible.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n We are now entering uncharted territory – although, come to think of it, that’s been true since Election Day, 2016. Hold on to your hats, folks, and get a grip on your nerves – because it’s going to be a long, scary ride.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n La Syrie face \u00e0 la \u00ab\u00a0cage-aux-folles\u00a0\u00bb Comme l’on sait, la situation se trouve \u00e0 nouveau, pour la ni\u00e8me occurrence, sur le bord d’une possible attaque US contre la Syrie… \u00ab\u00a0Cela, \u00e0 partir de la ni\u00e8me attaque chimique dont il est absolument inutile et sans le moindre int\u00e9r\u00eat de savoir s’il existe la moindre preuve que… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[5662,4020,2970,4337,3867,12938,12700,2639],"class_list":["post-77875","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-cruise","tag-folie","tag-missiles","tag-raimondo","tag-syrie","tag-telerealite","tag-tragedie-bouffe","tag-trump"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77875","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=77875"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77875\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=77875"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=77875"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=77875"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}\n
dedefensa.org<\/em><\/h4>\n<\/p>\n
Stupid or Dangerously Crazy ? Both<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n
Justin Raimondo<\/h4><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"