Le sommet dont d\u00e9pend en bonne part le Prix Nobel de la paix que Donald Trump a tant m\u00e9rit\u00e9 commence \u00e0 montrer quelques plombs dans l’aile. Le jeune Kim n’a pas, selon ses porte-paroles, appr\u00e9ci\u00e9 une intervention t\u00e9l\u00e9vis\u00e9e de John Bolton pr\u00e9cisant qu’avant toute n\u00e9gociation pour une concession am\u00e9ricaniste et imp\u00e9riale du type \u00ab\u00a0je desserre d’un cran telle sanction interdisant l’exportation de brosses \u00e0 dent\u00a0\u00bb, la Cor\u00e9e du Nord devrait imp\u00e9rativement confier aux USA toutes ses armes nucl\u00e9aires<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Le jeune Kim n’appr\u00e9cie pas, nous dit-on encore, de se voir offrir, en cadeau de r\u00e9conciliation le \u00ab\u00a0mod\u00e8le libyen\u00a0\u00bb<\/strong>(voyez avec les mannes de Kadhafi ce qu’il en est). Il y a eu aussi de la mauvaise humeur nord-cor\u00e9enne devant la tenue d’un exercice conjoint USA-Cor\u00e9e du Sud dont le sc\u00e9nario est bien entendu l’invasion du Nord<\/strong>. On a cru que le Pentagone faisait une concession de taille en retirant du programme une incursion de B-52 qui devaient participer \u00e0 l’exercice ; mais cela fut prestement d\u00e9menti : on n’a rien retir\u00e9 du tout puisque les B-52 ne faisaient pas partie du programme et que la concession n’est pas inscrit dans l’exercice.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Pour l’instant, la Cor\u00e9e du Nord n’a pris qu’une seule mesure : l’annulation d’une rencontre entre les deux Cor\u00e9es pour faire avancer la r\u00e9daction d’un trait\u00e9 de paix. Le Sud a \u00ab\u00a0regrett\u00e9 cette d\u00e9cision\u00a0\u00bb. A c\u00f4t\u00e9 de cela commencent \u00e0 bourdonner des bruits sur l’hypoth\u00e8seunpeu extr\u00eame de l’annulation du fameux sommet Kim-Trump. Les Chinois pr\u00eachent l’apaisement des deux\/trois c\u00f4t\u00e9s (USA, les deux Cor\u00e9es) tout en laissant penser \u00e0 leurs amis nord-cor\u00e9ens qu’effectivement l’\u00e9tat d’esprit du c\u00f4t\u00e9 am\u00e9ricaniste soul\u00e8ve des questions pr\u00e9occupantes. Des sources chinoises observent que la d\u00e9cision de Trump de se retirer du trait\u00e9 nucl\u00e9aire avec l’Iran a \u00e9tabli des conditions de m\u00e9fiance qui menacent effectivement le sommet <\/strong>et, plus sûrement, qui menacent de conduire \u00e0 un sommet sans r\u00e9sultat tangible<\/strong>. Les deux cas, — la crise de la Cor\u00e9e du Nord et celle de l’Iran, – sont de plus en plus irr\u00e9m\u00e9diablement li\u00e9es comme il convient dans un tourbillon crisique<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n « Kim Kye Gwan, a vice foreign minister and a top North Korea disarmament negotiator, said the regime was disappointed by the US’s articulation of its goals for the summit, according to a statement published Wednesday by the state-run Korean Central News Agency via Bloomberg<\/a>. Kim expressed anger toward Bolton and other US officials, adding that the North rejects the ‘Libya model’ where a state surrenders its weapons first then receives incentives like sanctions relief.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n » \u00ab\u00a0‘If the U.S. is trying to drive us into a corner to force our unilateral nuclear abandonment,<\/strong><\/em>we will no longer be interested in such dialogue and cannot but reconsider our proceeding to the DPRK-U.S. summit,’ Kim said. He added that Trump risked becoming a ‘more tragic and unsuccessful president than his predecessors’ if he didn’t accept North Korea as a nuclear power.\u00a0\u00bb<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n » Kim Kye Gwan said the North had already declared its willingness to denuclearize the peninsula – but that it must not be counted on to act first. ‘\u00a0\u00bbIf the Trump administration corners us and tries to force us to give up nuclear <\/strong><\/em>[weapons<\/strong>]unfairly<\/em><\/strong>,’<\/em>it says, ‘we will not be interested in such talks anymore and cannot help but reconsider having the upcoming DPRK-U.S. summit.'\u00a0\u00bb<\/em> » (De ZeroHedge.com<\/em>, le 16 mai 2018<\/a>.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Mis en ligne le 17 mai 2018 \u00e0 04H51<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Quelques torpilles entre Kim et Bolton Le sommet dont d\u00e9pend en bonne part le Prix Nobel de la paix que Donald Trump a tant m\u00e9rit\u00e9 commence \u00e0 montrer quelques plombs dans l’aile. Le jeune Kim n’a pas, selon ses porte-paroles, appr\u00e9ci\u00e9 une intervention t\u00e9l\u00e9vis\u00e9e de John Bolton pr\u00e9cisant qu’avant toute n\u00e9gociation pour une concession am\u00e9ricaniste… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[3977,3299,2631,2651,2773,2622,3644,3349,3004,6157,3477,2639],"class_list":["post-77945","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-breves-de-crise","tag-chine","tag-coree","tag-de","tag-du","tag-iran","tag-la","tag-nobel","tag-nord","tag-nucleaire","tag-paix","tag-prix","tag-trump"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77945","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=77945"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77945\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=77945"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=77945"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=77945"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}