Ce texte ci-dessous est aussi \u00e0 observer du point de vue de l’exemplarit\u00e9 de la circonstance qu’il nous offre : il ne pr\u00e9sente, dans notre chef, aucune garantie de v\u00e9racit\u00e9 ou autre chose dans ce genre mais il n’est apr\u00e8s tout et en rien du tout moins cr\u00e9dible et respectable que la pr\u00e9sentation d’un verdict de la Cour Supr\u00eame, un discours de Macron, un tweet de Trump ou une hom\u00e9lie du bon pape Fran\u00e7ois. Par contre, l’enchev\u00eatrement des noms, des fonctions et des \u00e9v\u00e9nements est extr\u00eamement riche, souvent amusant, parfois \u00e9difiant.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
(Par exemple il nous int\u00e9resse comme chose \u00e9difiante d’apprendre, ce qui n’est pas \u00e9vident mais qui nous semble assez bien d\u00e9taill\u00e9 et document\u00e9, que le directeur du FBI Comey, qui a jou\u00e9 un r\u00f4le de \u00ab\u00a0Mr. Propre\u00a0\u00bb remarquable en 2016 en prot\u00e9geant la veuve et l’orphelin non-\u00ab\u00a0d\u00e9plorables\u00a0\u00bb que repr\u00e9sentait \u00e9videmment Hillary, quitta en 2009 le minist\u00e8re de la justice [DoJ] pour passer chez Lockheed-Martin [LM] pour quelques ann\u00e9es, – 2009-2013 ; qu’il quitta LM pour la direction du FBI, annexe du DoJ, avec un bonus \u00ab\u00a0au-revoir-et-merci-beaucoup\u00a0\u00bb de $6 millions<\/strong> ; cela, juste r\u00e9compense, pour avoir assur\u00e9 17 contrats de cette firme avec le d\u00e9partement d’État que dirigeait justement Hillary<\/strong>, comme cela se trouve, pendant la similaire p\u00e9riode 2009-2013.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Effectivement, ce texte est un exemple \u00e0 tous \u00e9gards parce qu’il s’agit d’un commentaire d’un lecteur d’un texte de ZeroHedge.com <\/em>du 24 août 2018<\/a> ; que ce lecteur est anonyme sous le pseudo de RedMile<\/em> ; qu’il importe et nous importe assez peu que certains le reconnaissent et d’autres pas ; que son texte, – car il s’agit bien d’un texte, – n’a aucun rapport avec le texte qu’il pr\u00e9tend commenter. (Nous-m\u00eames ne nous int\u00e9ressons gu\u00e8re \u00e0 l’article concern\u00e9, texte d’un discours du ministre allemand des affaires \u00e9trang\u00e8res qui nous d\u00e9voile ses plans pour une aube nouvelle pour l’Europe.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Le texte de RedMile <\/em>traite des activit\u00e9s sordides de la longue bande rassembl\u00e9e autour des Clinton, des Comey aux Rosenstein, sous le regard amical et bienveillant, et multiculturel de sa Sublime Hauteur, l’Incroyable et Inimitable B.H. Obama. En fait de sordidit\u00e9, bien entendu, les uns valent les autres <\/strong>lorsqu’on songe aux sordides affaires m\u00e9langeant superbement sexe, corruption et trahison, qui opposent le Pr\u00e9sident \u00e0 son avocat-traître Michael Cohen. Bref, tout cela est de la m\u00eame tambouille<\/strong>, mais RedMile <\/em>tient \u00e0 nous rappeler que les vertueux accusateurs de Trump le valent bien, et m\u00eame bien au-del\u00e0 notamment dans la fa\u00e7on dont ils se sont arrang\u00e9s entre eux.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Mais laissons le texte, tr\u00e8s complexe, bourr\u00e9 de d\u00e9tails, etc., dont on ne peut appr\u00e9cier l’exactitude ou la v\u00e9racit\u00e9 puisque plac\u00e9s en face de l’anonymat de RedMile<\/em>, – facile \u00e0 percer ou pas. Encore une fois, disons pour notre part, nous qui avons pris ce texte sans rien savoir ni chercher \u00e0 savoir de l’anonyme<\/strong> pour bien jouer le jeu, que, par simple lecture, et toute aussi simple d\u00e9duction logique et r\u00e9flexe sanitaire de bon sens, notamment pour ce qui est de la \u00ab\u00a0puanteur des \u00e9gouts\u00a0\u00bb, nous serions inclin\u00e9s \u00e0 croire qu’un bon nombre des affirmations de RedMile <\/em>approchent bien plus jusqu’\u00e0 la r\u00e9v\u00e9ler une v\u00e9rit\u00e9 de-situation<\/a> <\/strong>que les derniers cent \u00e9ditoriaux du New York Times <\/em>et les derniers deux cents du WaPo<\/em>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n C’est ce qui fait la singularit\u00e9 de notre \u00e9poque, que nous puissions \u00e9crire ce que nous venons d’\u00e9crire sans vraiment nous sentir d\u00e9plac\u00e9s et ridicules<\/strong>, parce qu’effectivement le Syst\u00e8me a fracass\u00e9 la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 et condamn\u00e9 ses tr\u00e8s-ob\u00e9issants serviteurs \u00e0 suivre la voie du d\u00e9terminisme-narrativiste<\/a>, allant jusqu’\u00e0 l’invention quasiment copernicienne de la FakeNews <\/em>et de la doctrine qui va avec. Nous parlerions volontiers, pour l’occasion et puisqu’il est question de \u00ab\u00a0doctrine\u00a0\u00bb, du FakeNewsisme <\/em>qui est la fabrication complotiste des accusations de complot permanent lanc\u00e9es contre l’antiSyst\u00e8me, cela comme une posture qui constituerait l’axe central et la vertu fondamentale de la postmodernit\u00e9 tendant \u00e0 se constituer, du fait de l’avancement de la pourriture, en une sorte de \u00ab\u00a0postmorbidit\u00e9\u00a0\u00bb. (Le FakeNewsisme <\/em>comme doctrine de la postmorbidit\u00e9<\/strong>.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Mais enfin, – dit sur un ton moins sarcastique, on observera qu’un tel texte avec les remarques qui vont avec montrent combien le travail du commentateur est devenu, aujourd’hui, un travail d’enqu\u00eateur conduisant \u00e0 des prises de risque dont plus aucune r\u00e9f\u00e9rence institutionnelle ne saurait \u00eatre l’arbitre<\/strong>. La recherche des v\u00e9rit\u00e9s-de-situation<\/a> implique la raison-raisonnable d\u00e9barrass\u00e9e de la subversion id\u00e9ologique, le sens de la mesure, l’exp\u00e9rience, et la sublime intuition si elle veut bien se manifester<\/strong>. Rien ne nous garantit de clore l’enqu\u00eate en tout \u00e9quit\u00e9, rien ne nous garantit la v\u00e9rit\u00e9-de-situation au bout du chemin. La seule certitude identifiable est l’existence du Syst\u00e8me, c’est-\u00e0-dire du Mal, et c’est par rapport \u00e0 lui, c’est-\u00e0-dire constamment contre lui en identifiant \u00e0 chaque fois sa nouvelle position ou son nouveau masque, qu’il faut se situer<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Donc, place \u00e0 l’\u00e9trange olibrius de RedMile <\/em>dans le texte, et \u00e0 chacun de se faire son id\u00e9e… (On observera par ailleurs que le milieu qu’il d\u00e9crit et les acteurs qui s’y d\u00e9placent aident \u00e0 mieux comprendre, ou disons percevoir et ressentir l’actuelle situation<\/a> de pol\u00e9mique furieuse autour du r\u00f4le du DoJ dans les divers scandales qui entourent le pr\u00e9sident Trump comme une attaque d’Indiens autour des chariots du \u00ab\u00a0Monde Nouveau\u00a0\u00bb dans un western d’Hollywood.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n ________________________<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Here’s what it looks like when all the pieces are sewn together. It smells like conspiracy and treason. Everyone needs to read this. Slowly, and patiently, because it’s very important……<\/p>\n<\/p>\n From 2001 to 2005 there was an ongoing investigation into the Clinton Foundation<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n A Grand Jury had been impaneled. Governments from around the world had donated to the \u00ab\u00a0Charity\u00a0\u00bb. Yet, from 2001 to 2003 none of those \u00ab\u00a0Donations\u00a0\u00bb to the Clinton Foundation<\/strong> were declared. Now you would think that an honest investigator would be able to figure this out.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Look who took over this investigation in 2005: None other than James Comey<\/strong>; Coincidence? Guess who was transferred into the Internal Revenue Service to run the Tax Exemption Branch of the IRS? None other than, Lois \u00ab\u00a0Be on The Look Out\u00a0\u00bb (BOLO) Lerner<\/strong>. Isn’t that interesting? But this is all just a series of strange coincidences, right?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Guess who ran the Tax Division inside the Department of Injustice from 2001 to 2005?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n No other than the Assistant Attorney General of the United States, Rod Rosenstein<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Guess who was the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation during this time frame?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Another coincidence (just an anomaly in statistics and chances), but it was Robert Mueller<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n What do all four casting characters have in common? They all were briefed and\/or were front-line investigators into the Clinton Foundation Investigation<\/strong>. Another coincidence, right?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Fast forward to 2009….<\/p>\n<\/p>\n James Comey <\/strong>leaves the Justice Department to go and cash-in at Lockheed Martin.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Hillary Clinton <\/strong>is running the State Department, official government business, on her own personal email server. The Uranium One \u00ab\u00a0issue\u00a0\u00bb comes to the attention of the Hillary<\/strong>. Like all good public servants do, supposedly looking out for America’s best interest, she decides to support the decision and approve the sale of 20% of US Uranium to no other than, the Russians.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Now you would think that this is a fairly straight up deal, except it wasn’t, America got absolutely nothing out of it. However, prior to the sales approval, no other than Bill Clinton <\/strong>goes to Moscow gets paid 500K for a one-hour speech; then meets with Vladimir Putin at his home for a few hours.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Ok, no big deal right? Well, not so fast, the FBI had a mole inside the money laundering and bribery scheme.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Robert Mueller <\/strong>was the FBI Director during this time frame? Yep, He even delivered a Uranium Sample to Moscow in 2009.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Who was handling that case within the Justice Department out of the US Attorney’s Office in Maryland? None other than, Rod Rosenstein<\/strong>. And what happened to the informant?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n The Department of Justice placed a GAG order on him and threatened to lock him up if he spoke out about it.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n How does 20% of the most strategic asset of the United States of America end up in Russian hands when the FBI has an informant, a mole providing inside information to the FBI on the criminal enterprise? Very soon after; the sale was approved $145 million dollars in \u00ab\u00a0donations\u00a0\u00bb made their way into the Clinton Foundation <\/strong>from entities directly connected to the Uranium One deal.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Guess who was still at the Internal Revenue Service working the Charitable Division? None other than, – Lois Lerner<\/strong>. Ok, that’s all just another series of coincidences, nothing to see here, right?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Let’s fast forward to 2015.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Due to a series of tragic events in Benghazi and after the 9 \u00ab\u00a0investigations\u00a0\u00bb the House, Senate and at State Department, Trey Gowdy <\/strong>who was running the 10th investigation as Chairman of the Select Committee on Benghazi discovers that the Hillary<\/strong> ran the State Department on an unclassified, unauthorized, outlaw personal email server. He also discovered that none of those emails had been turned over when she departed her \u00ab\u00a0Public Service\u00a0\u00bb as Secretary of State which was required by law. He also discovered that there was Top Secret information contained within her personally archived email.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Sparing you the State Departments cover-up, the nostrums they floated, the delay tactics that were employed and the outright lies that were spewed forth from the necks of the Kerry State Department<\/strong>, we shall leave it with this… they did everything humanly possible to cover for Hillary<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Now, this is amazing, guess who became FBI Director in 2013? None other than James Comey<\/strong>; who secured 17 no-bid contracts for his employer (Lockheed Martin) with the State Department and was rewarded with a six million dollar thank you present when he departed his employer? Amazing how all those no-bids just went right through at State, huh?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Now he is the FBI Director in charge of the \u00ab\u00a0Clinton Email Investigation\u00a0\u00bb after of course his FBI Investigates the Lois Lerner <\/strong>\u00ab\u00a0Matter\u00a0\u00bb at the Internal Revenue Service and he exonerates her. Nope…. couldn’t find any crimes there.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n In April 2016, James Comey <\/strong>drafts an exoneration letter of Hillary Rodham Clinton<\/strong>, meanwhile the DOJ is handing out immunity deals like candy. They didn’t even convene a Grand Jury!<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Like a lightning bolt of statistical impossibility, like a miracle from God himself, like the true \u00ab\u00a0Gangsta\u00a0\u00bb Comey <\/strong>is, James steps out into the cameras of an awaiting press conference on July the 8th of 2016, and exonerates the Hillary from any wrongdoing. Do you see the pattern?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n It goes on and on, Rosenstein <\/strong>becomes Asst. Attorney General, Comey <\/strong>gets fired based upon a letter by Rosenstein<\/strong>, Comey <\/strong>leaks government information to the press, Mueller <\/strong>is assigned to the Russian Investigation sham by Rosenstein <\/strong>to provide cover for decades of malfeasance within the FBI and DOJ and the story continues.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n FISA Abuse, political espionage….. pick a crime, any crime, chances are…… this group and a few others did it:<\/p>\n<\/p>\n • All the same players.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n • All compromised and conflicted.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n • All working fervently to NOT go to jail themselves<\/p>\n<\/p>\n • All connected in one way or another to the Clinton’s.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n They are like battery acid; they corrode and corrupt everything they touch. How many lives have these two destroyed?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n As of this writing, the Clinton Foundation<\/strong>, in its 20+ years of operation of being the largest International Charity Fraud in the history of mankind, has never been audited by the Internal Revenue Service. Let us not forget that Comey’s brother works for DLA Piper, the law firm that does the Clinton Foundation’s taxes.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n The person that is the common denominator to all the crimes above and still doing her evil escape legal maneuvers at the top of the 3 Letter USA Agencies? Yep, that would be Hillary R. Clinton.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Now, who is LISA BARSOOMIAN<\/strong>? Let’s learn a little about Mrs. Lisa H. Barsoomian’s background.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Lisa H. Barsoomian<\/strong>, an Attorney that graduated from Georgetown Law, is a prot\u00e9g\u00e9 of James Comey <\/strong>and Robert Mueller<\/strong>. Barsoomian<\/strong>, with her boss R. Craig Lawrence<\/strong>, represented Bill Clinton in 1998. Lawrence also represented:<\/p>\n<\/p>\n • Robert Mueller three times;<\/p>\n<\/p>\n • James Comey five times;<\/p>\n<\/p>\n • Barack Obama 45 times;<\/p>\n<\/p>\n • Kathleen Sebelius 56 times;<\/p>\n<\/p>\n • Bill Clinton 40 times; and<\/p>\n<\/p>\n • Hillary Clinton 17 times.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Between 1998 and 2017, Barsoomian<\/strong> herself represented the FBI at least five times.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n You may be saying to yourself, OK, who cares? Who cares about the work history of this Barsoomian woman?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Apparently, someone does, because someone out there cares so much that they’ve \u00ab\u00a0purged\u00a0\u00bb allBarsoomian<\/strong>court documents for her Clinton representation in Hamburg vs. Clinton in 1998 and its appeal in 1999 from the DC District and Appeals Court dockets (?). Someone out there cares so much that even the internet has been \u00ab\u00a0purged\u00a0\u00bb of all information pertaining to Barsoomian<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Historically, this indicates that the individual is a protected CIA operative. Additionally, Lisa Barsoomian<\/strong>, has specialized in opposing the Freedom of Information Act requests on behalf of the intelligence community. Although Barsoomian<\/strong> has been involved in hundreds of cases representing the DC Office of the US Attorney, her email address is Lisa Barsoomian <\/strong>at NIH which is a .gov.<\/u> The NIH stands for National Institutes of Health. This is a tactic routinely used by the CIA to protect an operative by using another government organization to shield their activities. Is Barsoomian <\/strong>a possible CIA operative?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n It’s a cover, no big deal right? What does one more attorney with ties to the US intelligence community really matter? It deals with Trump and his recent tariffs on Chinese steel and aluminum imports, the border wall, DACA, everything coming out of California, the Uni-party unrelenting opposition to President Trump, the Clapper <\/strong>leaks, the Comey<\/strong> leaks, Attorney General Jeff Sessions<\/strong> recusal and subsequent 14 month nap with occasional forays into the marijuana legalization mix …. and last but not least Mueller’s <\/strong>never-ending investigation into collusion between the Trump team and-the Russians. Clapper and Comey<\/a> <\/strong>admitted that they were even spying on Trump during the election.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Why does Barsoomian<\/strong>, possible CIA operative, merit any mention?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n BECAUSE….<\/p>\n<\/p>\n She is Assistant Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s WIFE!<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n Complexit\u00e9 et puanteur des \u00e9gouts \u00e0 \u00ab\u00a0D.C.-la-folle\u00a0\u00bb Ce texte ci-dessous est aussi \u00e0 observer du point de vue de l’exemplarit\u00e9 de la circonstance qu’il nous offre : il ne pr\u00e9sente, dans notre chef, aucune garantie de v\u00e9racit\u00e9 ou autre chose dans ce genre mais il n’est apr\u00e8s tout et en rien du tout moins cr\u00e9dible… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[934,2839,6597,6640,18217,2838,3278,394,18496,18438,12511],"class_list":["post-78132","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-clinton","tag-comey","tag-commentaire","tag-doj","tag-fakenewsisme","tag-fbi","tag-hillary","tag-lockheed-martin","tag-redmile","tag-rosenstein","tag-verite-de-situation"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78132","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=78132"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78132\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=78132"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=78132"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=78132"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}\n
dedefensa.org<\/em><\/h4>\n<\/p>\n
Connecting some dots<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n
RedMile<\/em><\/h4><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"