{"id":78404,"date":"2019-01-10T13:12:10","date_gmt":"2019-01-10T13:12:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2019\/01\/10\/cia-cmi-la-femme-est-lavenir-de-lhomme\/"},"modified":"2019-01-10T13:12:10","modified_gmt":"2019-01-10T13:12:10","slug":"cia-cmi-la-femme-est-lavenir-de-lhomme","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2019\/01\/10\/cia-cmi-la-femme-est-lavenir-de-lhomme\/","title":{"rendered":"CIA, CMI\u00a0: \u00ab\u00a0La femme est l’avenir de l’homme<\/em>\u00a0\u00bb"},"content":{"rendered":"

CIA, CMI : « La femme est l’avenir de l’homme<\/em> »<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n

Dans ces temps \u00e9tranges, il n’est plus \u00e9trange d’entendre une Rachel Maddow, de MSNBC, qu’on entendait en 2003 pilonner Bush et les massacreurs de l’Irak, ceux de la CIA comme ceux qui utilisaient des bombes, des avions et des chars du complexe militaro-industriel (CMI) des USA, c\u00e9l\u00e9brer aujourd’hui cette CIA et ce CMI<\/strong>. On a certes eu le temps de dig\u00e9rer le tournant \u00e0 180° de Maddow et des lib\u00e9raux (les tr\u00e8s-progressistes aux USA) devenus \u00ab\u00a0interventionnistes-humanitaires\u00a0\u00bb c\u00e9l\u00e9brant les tueurs, – non, pas exactement, \u00ab\u00a0c\u00e9l\u00e9brant les tueurs\u00a0\u00bb parce que ce sont en fait des \u00ab\u00a0tueuses\u00a0\u00bb dont nous parlons<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\n

D\u00e9j\u00e0, le 3 janvier 2019, Ali Velshi c\u00e9l\u00e9brait dans son show du m\u00eame r\u00e9seau MSNBC le fait que quatre des cinq plus grands trusts du CMI ont comme dirigeant(e)s des femmes<\/a><\/strong> : « The CEOs of four of the five biggest defense contractors are women. <\/em>Watch Ali Velshi break down who is running Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin, General Dynamics, Boeing’s defense wing, and weapons<\/strong>…<\/em> »<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

D\u00e9sormais, c’est le tour de la CIA<\/strong>, qui a eu une femme pour la premi\u00e8re fois \u00e0 sa t\u00eate depuis le passage de Mike Pompeo de la direction de la CIA au d\u00e9partement d’État. Certes, Gina Haspel avait derri\u00e8re elle une belle notori\u00e9t\u00e9 de sp\u00e9cialiste des interrogatoires tr\u00e8s-tr\u00e8s-\u00ab\u00a0pouss\u00e9s\u00a0\u00bb, mais apr\u00e8s tout, cela aussi, et comment, – c’est sacr\u00e9ment la gloire du f\u00e9minisme ! <\/strong>Mais on va plus loin, beaucoup plus loin, puisque Haspel, d\u00e9cid\u00e9ment glorieuse militante f\u00e9ministe<\/strong>, a fait ce qu’il fallait pour que les principales directions \u00e9choient \u00e0 des femmes ; elles sont donc d\u00e9sormais quatre <\/strong>\u00e0 diriger la CIA, Haspel et ses trois directrices pour les principaux directorates <\/em>: Analyse, Op\u00e9rations, Science & Technologie.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Maddow et le f\u00e9minisme devraient donc jubiler<\/a>, donnant raison \u00e0 Aragon lorsqu’il aragonisait po\u00e9tiquement sous la surveillance d’Elsa, avant que Ferrat ne le chante : « La femme est l’avenir de l’homme <\/em>». Étrange \u00e9poque, indeed<\/em>, \u00e0 consommer d’assez loin sinon avec mod\u00e9ration<\/strong>, en attendant le XXII\u00e8me si\u00e8cle…<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

« Women now control all three directorates of the CIA – a historic milestone for gender equality in the clandestine regime change\/assassination sector. <\/em>Rachel Maddow seems to be celebrating, but why is Twitter full of party poopers?<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

» CIA Director Gina Haspel has appointed a fellow female comrade, Cynthia \u00ab\u00a0Didi\u00a0\u00bb Rapp, as deputy director for analysis, making her the highest-ranking analyst at the agency. Elizabeth Kimber was named the first female deputy director for operations in December, joining Dawn Meyerriecks, who has been the agency’s deputy director for science and technology for several years now. As a result, the main branches of the CIA – operations, analysis and science and technology – are now headed by women<\/em>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

» NBC News <\/em>toasted<\/a> <\/em>the agency’s all-female leadership with an article detailing the new\u00a0\u00bbsisterhood of spies\u00a0\u00bb. MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow – usually busy hallucinating about Vladimir Putin hiding under her bed – rushed to tweet the story, in an apparent endorsement of the new trifecta of unaccountable girl power<\/em>. »<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Mis en ligne le 10 janvier 2019 \u00e0 13H14<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

CIA, CMI : « La femme est l’avenir de l’homme » Dans ces temps \u00e9tranges, il n’est plus \u00e9trange d’entendre une Rachel Maddow, de MSNBC, qu’on entendait en 2003 pilonner Bush et les massacreurs de l’Irak, ceux de la CIA comme ceux qui utilisaient des bombes, des avions et des chars du complexe militaro-industriel (CMI)… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[18798,3012,3837,12883,18177,9105,3123],"class_list":["post-78404","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-breves-de-crise","tag-aragon","tag-complexe","tag-feminisme","tag-gina","tag-haspel","tag-maddow","tag-militaro-industriel"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78404","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=78404"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78404\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=78404"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=78404"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=78404"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}