{"id":78887,"date":"2019-10-08T12:26:21","date_gmt":"2019-10-08T12:26:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2019\/10\/08\/par-tres-gros-temps\/"},"modified":"2019-10-08T12:26:21","modified_gmt":"2019-10-08T12:26:21","slug":"par-tres-gros-temps","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2019\/10\/08\/par-tres-gros-temps\/","title":{"rendered":"Par tr\u00e8s-gros temps"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><h2 class=\"titleset_b.deepgreen\" style=\"color:#75714d; font-size:1.65em; font-variant:small-caps\">Par tr\u00e8s-gros temps <\/h2>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>On lira ce texte du <a href=\"https:\/\/kunstler.com\/clusterfuck-nation\/a-hard-rain\/\">7 octobre 2019<\/a>de James Howard Kunstler, \u00e9crit dans une belle langue ais\u00e9ment compr\u00e9hensible, pour cette fois empreinte de gravit\u00e9 et sans ses bons mots et ses jugements \u00e0 l&#8217;emporte-pi\u00e8ce qui font le charme de ses courtes chroniques. <strong>Non, cette fois la gravit\u00e9 est requise<\/strong>. Ce que Kunstler <strong>met en \u00e9vidence et en accusation<\/strong>, c&rsquo;est la f\u00e9lonie, l&rsquo;irresponsabilit\u00e9, la corruption intellectuelle, l&rsquo;infamie de cette gauche que nous d\u00e9signons comme \u00ab\u00a0progressiste-soci\u00e9tale\u00a0\u00bb et qui est essentiellement postmoderne, qui conduit \u00e0 Washington un projet monstrueux : &laquo; <em>La gauche semble opter pour la guerre civile<\/em>. [&#8230;] <em>Le parti d\u00e9mocrate fait tout son possible pour d\u00e9truire la l\u00e9gitimit\u00e9 de ces institutions, &ndash; en commen\u00e7ant par les \u00e9lections elles-m\u00eames<\/em>. &raquo;<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>Kunstler semble ainsi reprendre ses trois ann\u00e9es de critique acerbe et brillante pour en tracer le bilan <strong>et en pr\u00e9senter les perspectives presque fatales et catastrophiques<\/strong>, alors que nous atteignons le paroxysme de l&rsquo;hyst\u00e9rie de cette crise fabriqu\u00e9e dans un monstrueux simulacre. C&rsquo;est en homme de gauche, en lib\u00e9ral-progressiste ind\u00e9pendant selon la langue politique am\u00e9ricaine, en citoyen qui n&rsquo;a \u00e9videmment pas vot\u00e9 pour Trump (ni pour Hillary, au reste) et qui n&rsquo;a aucune estime particuli\u00e8re pour ce clown-devenu-pr\u00e9sident selon l&rsquo;image qu&rsquo;il emploie souvent, que Kunstler d\u00e9veloppe sa critique. Le premier paragraphe de son commentaire mais bien en \u00e9vidence ce paradoxe : c&rsquo;est bien en commentateur non-partisan qu&rsquo;il s&rsquo;attaque \u00e0 un des deux partis de l&rsquo;affrontement (\u00ab\u00a0La R\u00e9sistance\u00a0\u00bb, comme la gauche activiste s&rsquo;intitule elle-m\u00eame), parce que son comportement inf\u00e2me et totalement destructeur <strong>m\u00e9rite une critique objective, hors de tout parti-pris<\/strong> ; et les lecteurs n&rsquo;auront qu&rsquo;\u00e0 s&rsquo;en accommoder !<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>&laquo; <em>Beaucoup de lecteurs (dont certains sont d\u00e9sormais d&rsquo;anciens lecteurs) m&rsquo;ont violemment malmen\u00e9 par courriel pour avoir suivi avec attention l&rsquo;effort de ces trois derni\u00e8res ann\u00e9es de \u00ab\u00a0La R\u00e9sistance\u00a0\u00bb pour d\u00e9l\u00e9gitimer les \u00e9lections de 2016. Je n&rsquo;ai pas vot\u00e9 pour M. Trump (ou Mme Clinton), mais je n&rsquo;appr\u00e9cie pas le coup d&rsquo;&Eacute;tat tram\u00e9 pour le renverser. Je m&rsquo;oppose \u00e0 la mauvaise foi et \u00e0 la malhonn\u00eatet\u00e9 de \u00ab\u00a0La R\u00e9sistance\u00a0\u00bb. Je m&rsquo;oppose \u00e0 l&rsquo;inconduite criminelle au sein de la bureaucratie f\u00e9d\u00e9rale, \u00e0 la campagne mensong\u00e8re de ses complices des m\u00e9dias et \u00e0 l&rsquo;hyst\u00e9rie qu&rsquo;ils continuent de susciter, &ndash; au d\u00e9triment d&rsquo;autres questions qui concernent notre avenir<\/em>. &raquo;<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>En un sens, et parce qu&rsquo;il s&rsquo;agit d&rsquo;un ton inhabituel chez Kunstler qu&rsquo;il importe effectivement de restituer dans sa langue originale, ce texte constitue un signal d&rsquo;alarme particuli\u00e8rement inqui\u00e9tant, alors que nombre d&rsquo;autres chroniques de Kunstler pourraient avoir sembl\u00e9 \u00eatre plus imm\u00e9diatement alarmiste, d&rsquo;une fa\u00e7on sensationnaliste autant qu&rsquo;ironique. Si l&rsquo;on veut, le commentateur a certainement compris <strong>qu&rsquo;il s&rsquo;agit d&rsquo;une trag\u00e9die-bouffe<\/strong>, et il a souvent utilis\u00e9 le c\u00f4t\u00e9 bouffe pour donner du rythme et du sarcasme et son travail ; <strong>cette fois, c&rsquo;est de la trag\u00e9die qu&rsquo;il parle<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>Kunstler reprend la crise dans son ensemble, nous fait entendre ce qui devrait \u00eatre dans nos esprits <strong>comme l&rsquo;\u00e9vidence d&rsquo;un \u00e9v\u00e9nement formidable qui couve<\/strong>, comme un volcan sur le point d&rsquo;entrer en \u00e9ruption, ou plut\u00f4t comme d\u00e9j\u00e0 un \u00e9tat d&rsquo;une \u00e9ruption dont l&rsquo;issue s&rsquo;annonce de plus en plus <strong>comme une explosion promise \u00e0 secouer le monde<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><h4><em>dde.org<\/em><\/h4>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>___________________________<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><h2 class=\"titleset_a.deepgreen\" style=\"color:#75714d; font-size:2em\">A Hard Rain<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>A lot of readers (some of them former readers now) have been angrily twanging me by email for writing about the three-year Resistance effort to un-do the 2016 election. I did not vote for Mr. Trump (or Mrs. Clinton) but I resent the coup mounted to overthrow him. I object to the bad faith and dishonesty of the Resistance. I object to the criminal misconduct among the federal bureaucracy, and the mendacity of its partners in the news media, and the hysteria they continue to generate &mdash; at the expense of other matters that concern our future.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>The political disorder spooling out is the political expression of the long emergency that the nation faces as it finally encounters the limits to growth we were warned about decades ago. The techno-industrial phase of history is ending, and we are left only with inadequate fantasies for coming to terms with it and moving forward. The dynamic relationship between affordable energy supplies and the operations of money roils at the core of this predicament. They are undoing each other and the result will be a contraction of human activity. The big question we refuse to face is how to cope with contraction.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>Beyond the ongoing orchestrated coup stands a reality-optional political Left consumed by serial hysterias, uninterested in truth, steeped in social despotism, and apparently willing to do anything to gain power. We should be very concerned with what they intend to do with that power. As they attempt to redistribute wealth, they will make the unhappy discovery that the wealth itself is subject to the wholesale contraction underway. The overvalued \u00ab\u00a0assets\u00a0\u00bb representing \u00ab\u00a0money\u00a0\u00bb hoarded by the \u00ab\u00a0wealthy\u00a0\u00bb will turn out to be figments of a runaway debt crisis. We have already debased the operations of banking, and the tokens that banks issue &mdash; currencies and securities &mdash; levitate over an abyss.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>We already have plenty of evidence for what the Left will do to the principle of political liberty. Their shibboleths of \u00ab\u00a0diversity\u00a0\u00bb and \u00ab\u00a0inclusion\u00a0\u00bb really mean shutting down free speech and telling everybody how to think. They are less interested in \u00ab\u00a0social justice\u00a0\u00bb than in plain coercion, the pleasure they take in pushing people around. What&rsquo;s worse is that they want to use government as the instrument for enforcing their will. I object to that not just on principle but because government itself will be subject to the same contraction affecting everything else. It simply won&rsquo;t be able to compensate for all the other losses. Can we downscale its activities coherently, or will we make that journey violently, in some sort of civil war?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>The Left seems to be opting for civil war. It is surely underway among branches of government and the administrative bureaucracy I call the Deep State. Barack Obama, John Brennan and others set the intel and police apparatus against Mr. Trump and the war goes on in the latest reckless campaign of \u00ab\u00a0whistleblowers\u00a0\u00bb who are no such thing, but rather agents provocateurs of the Central Intelligence Agency.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>The Democrats in congress play a dangerous game with this as they attempt to engineer a non-impeachment impeachment &mdash; that is, without a vote by the whole House. To allow that vote would be a move to allow the opposition to participate in issuing subpoenas and seeing evidence, and the Democrats are bent on to preventing that. That ploy will provoke the White House to ignore their subpoenas and demands for documents on the principle that this mode of \u00ab\u00a0Impeachment\u00a0\u00bb is not legitimate.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>The machinations of Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Rep. Adam Schiff in this latest \u00ab\u00a0whistleblower\u00a0\u00bb affair pulsate with skullduggery. Are we to suppose that they will march out one \u00ab\u00a0whistleblower\u00a0\u00bb after another whose identity &mdash; or very reality &mdash; will remain secret through these proceedings? This is the sort of thing you get in Spanish inquisitions and soviet show trials. Until recently, all Americans had very firm objections to kangaroo courts and star chambers where the common-law safeguards of due process are thrown out the window. If the standoff goes to the Supreme Court, we&rsquo;ll surely get yet another crusade to disqualify Justice Kavanaugh.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>The Democratic Party is doing everything possible to destroy the legitimacy of these institutions &mdash; staring with elections themselves. The origins of the RussiaGate hoax will demonstrate that the party itself was behind \u00ab\u00a0interference\u00a0\u00bb in the 2016 election, and enlisted the help of several foreign governments in doing so. That is why they are so desperate to keep the level of hysteria amped to the max. The day may be not far off when a great and chilling silence falls over this mob as they look to the sky and see the indictments raining down.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><h4>James Howard Kunstler<\/h4><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Par tr\u00e8s-gros temps On lira ce texte du 7 octobre 2019de James Howard Kunstler, \u00e9crit dans une belle langue ais\u00e9ment compr\u00e9hensible, pour cette fois empreinte de gravit\u00e9 et sans ses bons mots et ses jugements \u00e0 l&#8217;emporte-pi\u00e8ce qui font le charme de ses courtes chroniques. Non, cette fois la gravit\u00e9 est requise. Ce que Kunstler&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[16509,2880,2625,13231,12598,3889,6125,3186,2645,2801,19404,19405,5623,6140],"class_list":["post-78887","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-activiste","tag-civile","tag-coup","tag-d-c-la-folle","tag-dalerte","tag-detat","tag-democrate","tag-gauche","tag-guerre","tag-kunstler","tag-la-resistance","tag-lanceurs","tag-parti","tag-pelosi"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78887","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=78887"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78887\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=78887"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=78887"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=78887"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}