{"id":78995,"date":"2019-12-09T16:24:42","date_gmt":"2019-12-09T16:24:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2019\/12\/09\/les-gi-sympathy-for-the-devil\/"},"modified":"2019-12-09T16:24:42","modified_gmt":"2019-12-09T16:24:42","slug":"les-gi-sympathy-for-the-devil","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2019\/12\/09\/les-gi-sympathy-for-the-devil\/","title":{"rendered":"Les G.I.\u00a0: \u201cSympathy for the Devil<\/em>\u201d\u00a0?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Les G.I. : \u00ab\u00a0Sympathy for the Devil<\/em>\u00a0\u00bb ?<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n

The Voice of America<\/a> <\/em>(VOA) panique, sous le titre complet de « Le Pentagone s’inqui\u00e8te de la sympathie pour la Russie qui progresse dans les forces US<\/em> ». L’on vient en effet de s’apercevoir, \u00e0 l’issue d’une enqu\u00eate statistique, que si 53% des soldats am\u00e9ricains consid\u00e8rent la Russie comme un ennemi (TB), tandis que 46% disent qu’ils consid\u00e8rent la Russie \u00ab\u00a0avec sympathie\u00a0\u00bb, comme un alli\u00e9 (damned<\/em>). Il s’agit d’un r\u00e9sultat, – d\u00e9mocratique par ailleurs, qui n’en conviendrait, – qui s’inscrit tr\u00e8s curieusement en contradiction de la feuille de route des \u00e9lites-Syst\u00e8me (127% estiment que la Russie est l’Ennemi), et m\u00eame du public en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral (71% du public juge la Russie comme un ennemi, 27% comme un alli\u00e9).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

ZeroHedge.com<\/a> <\/em>pr\u00e9sente l’article de VOA avec toutes les remarques qui s’imposent, y compris bien entendu de moquer l’argument de la m\u00eame VOA (organisme tr\u00e8s-DeepState<\/em>) selon lequel c’est bien entendu Trump, agent du Kremlin, qui a inocul\u00e9 ce sentiment de trahison totale \u00e0 un tel pourcentage de G.I.’s des forces am\u00e9ricanistes. Par contre, il s’attache aux causes de ce r\u00e9sultat finalement assez extraordinaire par rapport aux positions strat\u00e9giques du Pentagone et du reste dans le domaine. Peut-\u00eatre Tulsi Gabbard<\/a>, adversaires farouches des folles guerres de la politiqueSyst\u00e8me, commandant dans la Garde Nationale d’Hawaii avec deux d\u00e9ploiements en Irak, a-t-elle son id\u00e9e l\u00e0-dessus ; elle fait souvent des remarques sur l’aspect moral de la situation du soldat dans cette sorte de conflits postmodernes. Peut-\u00eatre le nombre effrayant (proche de deux millions) de v\u00e9t\u00e9rans souffrant de maux divers, notamment psychologiques (PTSD, ou TSPT<\/a> pour Troubles de Stress Post-Traumatique) , nous en donne \u00e9galement une indication.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Il s’agit des effets de guerres absurdes, conduites selon des motifs de corruption, d’id\u00e9ologisation, et aussi de d\u00e9rangement mentaux de type hyst\u00e9rique de la direction du Syst\u00e8me (direction am\u00e9ricaniste), dans le cadre desquels les Russes seraient intuitivement per\u00e7us par les hommes de troupe comme une voix de la raison, et m\u00eame d’une fa\u00e7on op\u00e9rationnelle par le r\u00f4le qu’ils jouent sur certains th\u00e9\u00e2tres d’op\u00e9ration (Ukraine, Syrie, etc.). Ce sentiment des soldats US n’est certainement pas celui des officiers haut-grad\u00e9s, notamment les officiers g\u00e9n\u00e9raux, qui sont quasiment tous acquis au Syst\u00e8me, corrompus, id\u00e9ologis\u00e9s et hyst\u00e9ris\u00e9s. Sans aucun doute, jamais un tel \u00e9cart de jugement et de comportement psychologique n’a exist\u00e9 au sein de l’arm\u00e9e US entre les troupes et les chefs, et cela se refl\u00e9tant sur les sentiments vis-\u00e0-vis de Trump : tr\u00e8s souvent d\u00e9test\u00e9<\/a> par les g\u00e9n\u00e9raux, Trump est appr\u00e9ci\u00e9<\/a> par les troupes parce qu’il a la r\u00e9putation d’\u00eatre contre ses guerres absurdes et qui rendent fous, plus que parce qu’il est, comme c’est bien connu, un agent r\u00e9tribu\u00e9 de la Tch\u00e9ka <\/em>depuis 1918.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Il faut voir dans quelle mesure cette disparit\u00e9 ne nous r\u00e9serverait pas des surprises en cas de troubles, de subversion, d’insubordination de chefs militaires, etc. On lit ci-dessous la pr\u00e9sentation du texte de VOA par Tyler Durden, nom de plume de ZeroHedge.com<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

dde.org<\/em><\/h4>\n<\/p>\n

_________________________<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Russia Is Gaining ‘Sympathy’ Among US Troops<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n

An alarmist headline out of US state-funded media arm Voice of America<\/em><\/a>: "Pentagon Concerned Russia Cultivating Sympathy Among US Troops". The story begins as follows:<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Russian efforts to weaken the West through a relentless campaign of information warfare may be starting to pay off, cracking a key bastion of the U.S. line of defense: the military. While most Americans still see Moscow as a key U.S. adversary, new polling suggests that view is changing, most notably among the households of military members<\/strong>. <\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Remember when Russia bombed Belgrade back to the middle ages, invaded and occupied Iraq, started an eighteen-year long quagmire in Afghanistan, created anarchy in Libya, funded and armed al-Qaeda in Syria, and expanded its bases right up to US borders? Neither do we. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Perhaps American soldiers are simply sick and tired of the US military and intelligence machine’s legacy of ashes<\/a> across the globe and recognize the inconvenient fact that Russia most often has been on the complete opposite side of Washington’s disastrous regime change wars<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Nothing to see here…<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

The second annual Reagan National Defense Survey, completed in late October, found nearly half of armed services households questioned, 46%, said they viewed Russia as ally<\/strong>.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Overall, the survey found 28% of Americans identified Russia as an ally, up from 19% the previous year<\/strong>.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

…While a majority, 71% of all Americans and 53% of military households, still views Russia as an enemy, the spike in pro-Russian sentiment has defense officials concerned<\/strong>. —VOA<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Perhaps US military households are also smart enough to know the Cold War is long over, and only bad things can come from a direct confrontation with Russia, not to mention that involvement in proxy war in Ukraine has nothing to do with America’s national defense or to "protect and defend the Constitution"<\/em>. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

To be expected, the VOA’s presentation of the new poll which finds more service members are ‘sympathetic’ to Russia is heavy on the supposed ‘Trump-Russia nexus’ narrative and emphasizes an uptick in Kremlin propaganda, while failing to acknowledge a failed legacy of ‘endless wars’ and destabilizing US influence across the globe. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

The poll itself claimed<\/a> the changing numbers were \u00ab\u00a0predominantly driven by Republicans who have responded to positive cues from [U.S.] President [Donald] Trump about Russia.\u00a0\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\u00ab\u00a0There is an effort, on the part of Russia, to flood the media with disinformation to sow doubt and confusion<\/strong>,\u00a0\u00bb DoD spokesperson Lieutenant Colonel Carla Gleason was cited in the VOA report as saying. Ah yes, a few Kremlin-sponsored Facebook posts and Trump’s expressed desire for better relations with Putin, and suddenly the military too is ‘pro-Putin’! <\/em>apparently.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Perhaps the "doubt and confusion" comes via trillion dollar endless wars of regime change and pointless occupations which cost American lives? In other words, this is not a ‘Russia problem’ at all, but lies too close to home for Washington pundits and pollsters to admit. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Finally, we should ask, would US military members see in today’s foreign policy adventurism anything remotely resembling John Quincy Adams’ famous 1821 admonition? <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

"But she goes not abroad, in search of monsters to destroy.<\/strong> She is the well-wisher to the freedom and independence of all. She is the champion and vindicator only of her own. She will commend the general cause by the countenance of her voice, and the benignant sympathy of her example. She well knows that by once enlisting under other banners than her own, were they even the banners of foreign independence, she would involve herself beyond the power of extrication, in all the wars of interest and intrigue, of individual avarice, envy, and ambition, which assume the colors and usurp the standard of freedom. The fundamental maxims of her policy would insensibly change from liberty to force…. She might become the dictatress of the world.<\/strong> She would be no longer the ruler of her own spirit…"<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Tyler Durden<\/h4><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Les G.I. : \u00ab\u00a0Sympathy for the Devil\u00a0\u00bb ? The Voice of America (VOA) panique, sous le titre complet de « Le Pentagone s’inqui\u00e8te de la sympathie pour la Russie qui progresse dans les forces US ». L’on vient en effet de s’apercevoir, \u00e0 l’issue d’une enqu\u00eate statistique, que si 53% des soldats am\u00e9ricains consid\u00e8rent la… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[14144,12696,5181,2622,18129,3286,19550,2730,9222,5929,14143,2671,12178],"class_list":["post-78995","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-durden","tag-folles","tag-guerres","tag-la","tag-postmodernes","tag-pour","tag-pstd","tag-russie","tag-sympathie","tag-troupes","tag-tyler","tag-us","tag-zerohedge"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78995","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=78995"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78995\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=78995"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=78995"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=78995"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}